MCD vs SBUX

For growth investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger pick with 3.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 23.

3x versus Starbucks Corporation at 61. 7x. On forward P/E, McDonald's Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 1. 57x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) delivered a total return of +35.

4%, compared to +1. 9% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +169. 8% versus SBUX's +114. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

06β versus Starbucks Corporation's 0. 71β — meaning SBUX is approximately 1043% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is pulling ahead at 3.

7% versus 2. 8% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McDonald's Corporation grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Starbucks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCD leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus 5. 0% for Starbucks Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus 9. 6% for SBUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 57x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 70x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) trades at 21. 5x forward P/E versus 42. 1x for Starbucks Corporation — 20. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MCD: 24. 7% to $347. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 4% for Starbucks Corporation (SBUX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 2. 6% yield, +169. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +169. 8%, SBUX: +114. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.