Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GOOGL | 15.1% revenue growth vs MOMO's -12.0% |
| Value | MOMO | Lower P/E (1.1x vs 27.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | GOOGL | 32.8% net margin vs MOMO's 8.2% |
| Stability / Safety | MOMO | Beta 0.47 vs GOOGL's 0.99 |
| Dividends | MOMO | 8.6% yield, vs GOOGL's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GOOGL | +83.6% vs MOMO's -8.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GOOGL | 22.2% ROA vs MOMO's 5.2%, ROIC 24.7% vs 11.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.
Alphabet is a technology conglomerate best known as the parent company of Google, which dominates the digital advertising market through search, YouTube, and display ads. It generates over 80% of its revenue from advertising, with the remainder coming from Google Cloud services, hardware sales, and subscription products like YouTube Premium. Its primary moat is the massive network effect of its search ecosystem — billions of users, advertisers, and content creators locked into its platforms through data, scale, and habit.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MOMO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $402.9B annually — 38.5x MOMO's $10.5B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 32.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOMO's 8.2%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.5B | $402.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $150.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $854M | $132.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +59.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +32.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +32.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -139.6% | +31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, MOMO trades at a 72% valuation discount to GOOGL's 28.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 11.5x.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $1.69T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $1.73T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.95x | 28.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.11x | 27.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.80x | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 9.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.17x | 23.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $8 for MOMO. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MOMO's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs MOMO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +31.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +22.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $459M | $41.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.1B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $72.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.22x | 903.26x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $30,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,497 for MOMO. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +83.6% total return vs MOMO's -8.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 51.5% vs MOMO's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.4% | +83.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.1% | +247.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | +202.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +773.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.1% | +51.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs MOMO's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.22 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.12 | $140.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +89.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.4 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 769K | 28.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MOMO as "Buy" and GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.2% upside for MOMO (target: $8) vs 14.6% for GOOGL (target: $357). For income investors, MOMO offers the higher dividend yield at 8.64% vs GOOGL's 0.26%.
| Metric | MOMOHello Group Inc. | GOOGLAlphabet Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.10 | $357.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.6% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.83 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.9% | +2.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 23.43 | -76.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 495.8 | +395.8% |
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) returned +203% over 5 years vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)'s -45%. A $10,000 investment in GOOGL 5 years ago would be worth $30,266 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | $3.8B | $10.6B | +175.0% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | $90.3B | $403.0B | +346.4% |
Alphabet Inc.'s revenue grew from $90.3B (2016) to $403.0B (2025) — a 18.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 26.3% | 9.8% | -62.5% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 21.6% | 32.8% | +52.0% |
Alphabet Inc.'s net margin went from 22% (2016) to 33% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 2.4 | 1.4 | -41.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 58.5 | 29 | -50.4% |
Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x. Alphabet Inc. has traded in a 19x–59x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 5 | 5.58 | +11.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 1.39 | 10.81 | +677.7% |
Alphabet Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.39 (2016) to $10.81 (2025) — a 26% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021). Alphabet Inc. generated $73B FCF in 2025 (+9% vs 2021).
MOMO vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOMO or GOOGL a better buy right now?
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.0x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOMO or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the cheapest at 8.0x versus Alphabet Inc. at 28.8x. On forward P/E, Hello Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 1.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOMO or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) delivered a total return of +202.7%, compared to -45.0% for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO). A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +773.4% versus MOMO's -9.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOMO or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.47β versus Alphabet Inc.'s 0.99β — meaning GOOGL is approximately 112% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 40% for Hello Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MOMO or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32.8% net margin versus 9.8% for Hello Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 32.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32.1% versus 14.5% for MOMO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MOMO or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) trades at 1.1x forward P/E versus 27.3x for Alphabet Inc. — 26.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOMO: 25.2% to $8.10.
07Which pays a better dividend — MOMO or GOOGL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the highest yield at 8.6%, versus 0.3% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL).
08Is MOMO or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.47), 8.6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9.4%, GOOGL: +773.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MOMO and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOMO (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MOMO pays a dividend while GOOGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 3.4%