Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTSI | 32.6% revenue growth vs QCOM's 13.7% |
| Value | QCOM | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 55.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | MTSI | 15.9% net margin vs QCOM's 12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | QCOM | Beta 1.48 vs MTSI's 1.69 |
| Dividends | QCOM | 2.4% yield; 23-year raise streak; MTSI pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MTSI | +114.5% vs QCOM's -7.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | QCOM | 10.1% ROA vs MTSI's 7.7%, ROIC 29.1% vs 6.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
MACOM Technology Solutions designs and manufactures analog semiconductor components for wireless and wireline communications infrastructure. It generates revenue primarily from sales of RF, microwave, and optical semiconductors—roughly 60% from telecommunications infrastructure and 40% from industrial and defense applications. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep expertise in high-performance analog semiconductors for demanding applications like 5G base stations, military radar, and data center interconnects.
Qualcomm is a semiconductor and wireless technology company that designs and licenses foundational technologies for mobile communications. It generates revenue primarily through selling smartphone chipsets (~75% of revenue) and licensing its extensive patent portfolio for wireless standards like 5G (~25% of revenue). The company's key advantage is its massive portfolio of essential wireless patents—particularly in CDMA and 5G—which creates a licensing moat that generates high-margin recurring revenue.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MTSI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.9B annually — 44.0x MTSI's $1.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.9% (MTSI) to 12.0% (QCOM). On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $44.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $221M | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $162M | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.5% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +28.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.2% | -1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 98.7x.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.6B | $152.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.0B | $161.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -339.89x | 28.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.51x | 12.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 98.67x | 11.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.24x | 3.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.83x | 7.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 96.53x | 11.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $12 for MTSI. MTSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QCOM scores 6/9 vs MTSI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $426M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $538M | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 33.58x | 18.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $36,027 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,332 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +114.5% total return vs QCOM's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 53.5% vs QCOM's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.8% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +114.5% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +262.0% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +260.3% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +554.7% | +234.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +53.5% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTSI's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs QCOM's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $256.11 | $205.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.00 | $120.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MTSI as "Buy" and QCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for QCOM (target: $162) vs -2.2% for MTSI (target: $243). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.42% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MTSIMACOM Technology … | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $242.63 | $161.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +5.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 904.47 | +804.5% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 194.92 | +94.9% |
MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) returned +260% over 5 years vs QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)'s +13%. A $10,000 investment in MTSI 5 years ago would be worth $36,027 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | $544M | $967M | +77.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | $23.6B | $44.3B | +88.0% |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $544M (2016) to $967M (2025) — a 6.6% CAGR. QUALCOMM Incorporated's revenue grew from $23.6B (2016) to $44.3B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 0.3% | -5.6% | -2227.8% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 24.2% | 12.5% | -48.3% |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 0% (2016) to -6% (2025). QUALCOMM Incorporated's net margin went from 24% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 145 | 124.9 | -13.9% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 39 | 34.1 | -12.6% |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 10x–145x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~-340x. QUALCOMM Incorporated has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~28x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 0.03 | -0.73 | -2533.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 3.81 | 5.01 | +31.5% |
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.03 (2016) to $-0.73 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR. QUALCOMM Incorporated's EPS grew from $3.81 (2016) to $5.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. generated $193M FCF in 2025 (+48% vs 2021). QUALCOMM Incorporated generated $13B FCF in 2025 (+48% vs 2021).
MTSI vs QCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTSI or QCOM a better buy right now?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 28.4x trailing P/E (12.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTSI or QCOM?
On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTSI or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) delivered a total return of +260.3%, compared to +13.3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth approximately $36K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +554.7% versus QCOM's +234.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTSI or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.48β versus MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s 1.69β — meaning MTSI is approximately 15% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MTSI or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.5% net margin versus -5.6% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27.9% versus 13.4% for MTSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MTSI or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 12.7x forward P/E versus 55.5x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 42.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QCOM: 13.4% to $161.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — MTSI or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (2.4% yield) pays a dividend. MTSI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MTSI or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.4% yield, +234.4% 10Y return). MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) carries a higher beta of 1.69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +234.4%, MTSI: +554.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MTSI and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. QCOM pays a dividend while MTSI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.