Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MU | 48.9% revenue growth vs GSIT's -5.7% |
| Quality / Margins | MU | 28.1% net margin vs GSIT's -48.5% |
| Stability / Safety | GSIT | Beta 1.40 vs MU's 2.16 |
| Dividends | MU | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; GSIT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MU | +340.9% vs GSIT's +185.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MU | 13.9% ROA vs GSIT's -22.4%, ROIC 13.2% vs -34.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Micron Technology is a leading semiconductor company that designs and manufactures memory and storage chips used in computers, smartphones, data centers, and automotive systems. It generates revenue primarily from DRAM products (~70% of sales) and NAND flash memory (~25%), with the remainder from NOR flash and other storage solutions. The company's competitive advantage lies in its advanced manufacturing scale and R&D capabilities in memory technology—one of only three major DRAM producers globally—which creates significant barriers to entry.
GSI Technology is a fabless semiconductor company that designs and markets specialized memory solutions for demanding applications in networking, aerospace, military, and industrial markets. It generates revenue primarily from static random access memory (SRAM) products — including radiation-hardened versions for aerospace — and its newer associative processing units for similarity search applications. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep expertise in high-performance, specialized memory architectures for mission-critical applications where reliability and performance are paramount.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MU is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.3B annually — 1761.2x GSIT's $24M. MU is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIT's -48.5%. On growth, MU holds the edge at +56.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42.3B | $24M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22.4B | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.9B | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.9B | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +55.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | -48.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.1% | -48.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.2% | -32.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.7% | +41.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.4% | +47.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $462.7B | $247M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $468.3B | $243M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.33x | -19.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.07x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.70x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.38x | 12.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.56x | 7.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 277.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MU delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-30 for GSIT. MU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSIT's 0.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MU scores 7/9 vs GSIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.3% | -30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.9% | -22.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | -34.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | -29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.6B | -$4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9.6B | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.3B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.11x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MU five years ago would be worth $43,731 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,639 for GSIT. Over the past 12 months, MU leads with a +340.9% total return vs GSIT's +185.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MU at 92.7% vs GSIT's 71.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.7% | +21.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +340.9% | +185.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +615.6% | +400.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +337.3% | +6.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3798.4% | +108.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +92.7% | +71.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GSIT is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MU's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MU currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs GSIT's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $455.50 | $18.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.54 | $1.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +45.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.9 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MU as "Buy" and GSIT as "Buy". MU is the only dividend payer here at 0.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MUMicron Technology… | GSITGSI Technology, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $363.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 68 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.46 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | 100 | 801.98 | +702.0% |
| GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) | 100 | 108.23 | +8.2% |
Micron Technology, … (MU) returned +337% over 5 years vs GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT)'s +6%. A $10,000 investment in MU 5 years ago would be worth $43,731 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | $12.4B | $37.4B | +201.5% |
| GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) | $53M | $21M | -61.1% |
Micron Technology, Inc.'s revenue grew from $12.4B (2016) to $37.4B (2025) — a 13.0% CAGR. GSI Technology, Inc.'s revenue grew from $53M (2016) to $21M (2025) — a -10.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | -2.2% | 22.8% | +1126.3% |
| GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) | -4.1% | -51.9% | -1160.1% |
Micron Technology, Inc.'s net margin went from -2% (2016) to 23% (2025). GSI Technology, Inc.'s net margin went from -4% (2016) to -52% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | 9.3 | 37.6 | +304.3% |
Micron Technology, Inc. has traded in a 3x–120x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~54x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | -0.27 | 7.59 | +2911.1% |
| GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) | -0.1 | -0.42 | -337.5% |
Micron Technology, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.27 (2016) to $7.59 (2025). GSI Technology, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.10 (2016) to $-0.42 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Micron Technology, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (-32% vs 2021). GSI Technology, Inc. generated $-13M FCF in 2025 (+16% vs 2021).
MU vs GSIT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MU or GSIT a better buy right now?
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) offers the better valuation at 54.3x trailing P/E (12.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) a "Buy" — based on 68 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MU or GSIT?
Over the past 5 years, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) delivered a total return of +337.3%, compared to +6.4% for GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT). A $10,000 investment in MU five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MU returned +38.0% versus GSIT's +108.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MU or GSIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.40β versus Micron Technology, Inc.'s 2.16β — meaning MU is approximately 54% more volatile than GSIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 34% for GSI Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — MU or GSIT?
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is the more profitable company, earning 22.8% net margin versus -51.9% for GSI Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MU leads at 26.4% versus -52.8% for GSIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSIT leads at 49.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — MU or GSIT?
In this comparison, MU (0.1% yield) pays a dividend. GSIT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is MU or GSIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+108.7% 10Y return). Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) carries a higher beta of 2.16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSIT: +108.7%, MU: +38.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between MU and GSIT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.