Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) vs SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MXC | 11.4% revenue growth vs SD's -15.7% |
| Value | SD | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 13.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | SD | 42.4% net margin vs MXC's 18.1% |
| Dividends | SD | 11.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MXC's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SD | +53.8% vs MXC's -0.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SD | 10.7% ROA vs MXC's 6.1%, ROIC 8.6% vs 9.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Mexco Energy is an independent oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, crude oil, and related liquids across multiple U.S. basins. It generates revenue primarily from oil and gas production sales — with income also coming from royalty interests and leasehold mineral rights — though specific segment percentages aren't publicly broken out. The company's competitive advantage lies in its diversified portfolio of partial interests in thousands of producing wells across 14 states, which spreads operational risk and provides stable cash flow from mature assets.
SandRidge Energy is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It generates revenue primarily from the sale of oil and natural gas production — with oil contributing roughly 60% and natural gas around 40% of total revenue — derived from its operated wells in Oklahoma and Kansas. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost operating structure and concentrated acreage position in mature, predictable basins that enable efficient development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). MXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SD is the larger business by revenue, generating $156M annually — 22.5x MXC's $7M. SD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MXC's 18.1%. On growth, SD holds the edge at +32.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $156M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $98M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +49.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +42.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +56.6% | +24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.8% | +32.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.9% | -37.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, SD trades at a 25% valuation discount to MXC's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MXC's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SD's 8.3x.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $645M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $547M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.83x | 10.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.83x | 8.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.86x | 13.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SD delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for MXC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MXC scores 6/9 vs SD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $126,525 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 666.44x | 69.60x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth $43,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,286 for MXC. Over the past 12 months, SD leads with a +53.8% total return vs MXC's -0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SD at 14.9% vs MXC's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.5% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.1% | +53.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.1% | +51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | +336.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +385.2% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MXC is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SD's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs MXC's 70.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.26x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.00 | $17.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.89 | $8.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.0% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.10% vs MXC's 0.89%.
| Metric | MXCMexco Energy Corp… | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +11.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.10 | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC) | 100 | 305.52 | +205.5% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 100 | 729.17 | +629.2% |
SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) returned +336% over 5 years vs Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC)'s +43%. A $10,000 investment in SD 5 years ago would be worth $43,649 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC) | $2M | $7M | +203.8% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | $769M | $125M | -83.7% |
Mexco Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $2M (2015) to $7M (2024) — a 13.1% CAGR. SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $769M (2015) to $125M (2024) — a -18.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC) | -164.3% | 23.3% | +114.2% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -4.8% | 50.3% | +1145.1% |
Mexco Energy Corporation's net margin went from -164% (2015) to 23% (2024). SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from -5% (2015) to 50% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC) | 79.8 | 13.9 | -82.6% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 14.6 | 6.9 | -52.7% |
Mexco Energy Corporation has traded in a 6x–80x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. SandRidge Energy, Inc. has traded in a 3x–15x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~10x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mexco Energy Corpor… (MXC) | -1.95 | 0.81 | +141.5% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -7.08 | 1.69 | +123.9% |
Mexco Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $-1.95 (2015) to $0.81 (2024). SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-7.08 (2015) to $1.69 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Mexco Energy Corporation generated $1M FCF in 2024 (-54% vs 2021). SandRidge Energy, Inc. generated $48M FCF in 2024 (-52% vs 2021).
MXC vs SD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MXC or SD a better buy right now?
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the better valuation at 10.4x trailing P/E (10.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) a "Hold" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MXC or SD?
On trailing P/E, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the cheapest at 10.4x versus Mexco Energy Corporation at 13.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MXC or SD?
Over the past 5 years, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) delivered a total return of +336.5%, compared to +42.9% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC). A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MXC returned +385.2% versus SD's +13.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MXC or SD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the lower-risk stock at -0.26β versus SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s 0.86β — meaning SD is approximately -426% more volatile than MXC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — MXC or SD?
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the more profitable company, earning 50.3% net margin versus 23.3% for Mexco Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 50.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SD leads at 26.5% versus 26.5% for MXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MXC leads at 44.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MXC or SD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the highest yield at 11.1%, versus 0.9% for Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC).
07Is MXC or SD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.26), 0.9% yield, +385.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MXC: +385.2%, SD: +13.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MXC and SD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.