SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD)
Valuation Overview•Is SandRidge Energy, Inc. Overvalued or Undervalued?
Commands a premium valuation multiple over its peers, likely pricing in superior execution.
High-quality fundamentals with a strong composite quality score of 79/100, backed by robust profitability and solvency.
Wall Street forecasts a balanced outlook with consensus price targets near the current price.
Verdict: Solid fundamental quality, though profitability presents a headwind.
Wall Street sentiment is generally neutral alongside robust expected earnings growth. This is paired with healthy capital returns, anchored by a strong, well-covered dividend yield.
SD demonstrates strong business quality with robust profitability and healthy margins. This is backed by a fortress balance sheet, holding significant net cash ($111M) and minimal debt risk.
The company is facing top-line contraction (-15.0% 3Y CAGR) however, earnings have severely contracted over the same period. This growth is supported by elite operational efficiency, sustaining an impressive 42.1% operating margin.
| Financial Metric | Trend (12Q) | Latest Qtr | 1Y Growth | 3Y CAGR | 5Y CAGR | 10Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $49.8M | +24.8% | -15.0% | +6.3% | -14.7% | |
| EBITDA | $33.0M | — | -20.5% | — | — | |
| Net Income | $18.7M | +11.5% | -33.8% | — | — | |
| EPS (Diluted) | $0.50 | +12.4% | -33.7% | — | — | |
| Free Cash Flow | -$3.8M | -31.7% | -35.2% | +6.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | 3Y Avg | 5Y Avg | 10Y Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 43.2% | 52.7% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 42.1% | 34.8% | 48.2% | -76.0% |
| Net Margin | 46.4% | 45.4% | 60.1% | -58.0% |
| FCF Margin | 12.9% | 37.0% | 43.3% | 6.8% |
| Quarter | EPS Est. | EPS Act. | Surprise | EPS | Rev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2'26Latest | $0.41 | $0.59 | +43.9% | ||
| Q1'26 | $0.37 | $0.34 | -8.1% | ||
| Q4'25 | $0.37 | $0.42 | +13.5% | ||
| Q3'25 | $0.29 | $0.33 | +13.8% | ||
| Q2'25 | $0.43 | $0.39 | -9.3% | ||
| Q1'25 | $0.48 | $0.34 | -29.2% | ||
| Q4'24 | $0.27 | $0.19 | -29.6% | ||
| Q3'24 | $0.28 | $0.17 | -39.3% |
Total return is +21.8% (1Y), lagging the benchmark by -3.2%
| Period | Total Return | vs S&P 500 (Alpha) | Dividend Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | -2.1% | -11.4% | — |
| 1Y | +21.8% | -3.2% | +5.7% |
| 3YCAGR | +7.2% | -12.1% | +22.0% |
| 5YCAGR | +25.8% | +13.8% | +83.5% |
| 10YCAGR | -0.2% | -13.8% | — |
The S&P 500 is at 31.3x trailing P/E — Expensive relative to historical averages.
Quick answers to common questions about SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) valuation, health, and returns.
Based on peer relative multiples, SandRidge Energy, Inc. appears Expensive versus peers compared to industry peers.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. has multiple valuation anchors: Peer Relative Fair Value: $11.16. A convergence of these signals offers higher conviction.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. displays good financial health with a composite quality score of 79/100, supported by a Altman Z-Score of 1.9 (grey zone), Piotroski F-Score of 8/9, Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of 10.7%.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. pays a 3.1% dividend yield, covered by a 23% payout ratio with 3 years of growth, supplemented by a 1.2% buyback yield.
SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s current growth trajectory is Accelerating. The company achieved +24.8% 1Y revenue growth and +12.4% 1Y EPS growth, compared to its 3Y revenue CAGR of -15.0%.
Wall Street consensus is Hold based on 24 analysts, beating EPS expectations in 58% of recent quarters with a 1-quarter streak. The consensus price target represents a N/A change from current levels.
Investment risks for SandRidge Energy, Inc. include: -22.5% 1-year max drawdown. Volatility risk is characterized by a beta of -0.22x.
No. These computations are purely quantitative model outputs for informational purposes. They do not account for qualitative management shifts or macro events. Always consult a licensed RIA before buying or selling shares.
Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. All valuation models, scores, and target estimates are automated computations under stated assumptions and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for any investment decision.