Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NRGV vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
NRGV vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $728M | $198.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-115M | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | -35.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.6x |
| Total Debt | $95M | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $2.81B |
NRGV vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 43.4 | -56.6% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 126.2 | +26.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRGV vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRGV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.08, current ratio 0.73x
- 340.9% revenue growth vs NEE's 11.0%
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.3%
- 274.2% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -56.4%
- Beta 0.21, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs NEE's 11.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs NRGV's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 30-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs NEE's +46.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs NRGV's -40.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs -49.5% |
NRGV vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NRGV vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 128.7x NRGV's $217M. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$72M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$115M | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$98M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.0% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.2% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +156.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -42.9% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NRGV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $728M | $198.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $765M | $291.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.48x | 28.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.58x | 7.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.63x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEE's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEE scores 5/9 vs NRGV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -146.8% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.3% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.7% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36M | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $95M | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.33x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NRGV and NEE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $14,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for NRGV. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +510.5% total return vs NEE's +46.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.8% vs NEE's 10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +510.5% | +46.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.8% | +33.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +42.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.4% | +274.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.8% | +10.2% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs NRGV's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.08x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.35 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.3% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NRGV as "Buy" and NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for NEE (target: $98) vs -34.7% for NRGV (target: $3). NEE is the only dividend payer here at 2.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.75 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NEE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NRGV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NRGV vs NEE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRGV or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the better valuation at 29. 0x trailing P/E (23. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NRGV or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +42. 0%, compared to -57. 0% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +274. 2% versus NRGV's -56. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NRGV or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 1387% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NRGV or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 28. 6% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NRGV leads at 11. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NRGV or NEE?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NRGV or NEE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEE: 2.
9% to $98. 13.
07Which pays a better dividend — NRGV or NEE?
In this comparison, NEE (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NRGV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NRGV or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 3% yield, +274. 2% 10Y return). Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +274. 2%, NRGV: -56. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NRGV and NEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NEE pays a dividend while NRGV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.