Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs AMBQ's 16.1% |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% net margin vs AMBQ's -52.1% |
| Stability / Safety | NVDA | Beta 1.73 vs AMBQ's 2.81 |
| Dividends | NVDA | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; AMBQ pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NVDA | +41.9% vs AMBQ's -20.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs AMBQ's -44.9%, ROIC 81.8% vs -104.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Ambiq Micro designs ultra-low-power semiconductor chips for battery-powered IoT and wearable devices. It generates revenue primarily from selling its Apollo system-on-chip and Atomiq AI accelerator products — with technical support services as a secondary stream — through a global sales representative network. The company's key advantage is its proprietary subthreshold power-optimized technology that enables significantly longer battery life than conventional chips, creating a strong moat in power-sensitive edge AI applications.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). AMBQ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 2838.8x AMBQ's $76M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBQ's -52.1%.
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $215.9B | $76M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133.2B | — |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $96.7B | — |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.1% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.4% | -53.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | -52.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | -33.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.8% | — |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.31T | $560M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.31T | $500M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.16x | -9.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.88x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.33x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.94x | 7.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.52x | 4.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.54x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-55 for AMBQ. AMBQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVDA's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMBQ scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +76.3% | -54.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +58.1% | -44.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +81.8% | -104.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +97.2% | -53.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $807M | -$60M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.6B | $61M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.4B | $966,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 545.03x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,968 for AMBQ. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +41.9% total return vs AMBQ's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs AMBQ's -7.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.2% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.9% | -20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +663.5% | -20.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1181.2% | -20.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22525.7% | -20.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +96.9% | -7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBQ's 2.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs AMBQ's 59.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 2.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $212.19 | $51.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $86.62 | $22.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +59.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 59.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136.2M | 237K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NVDA as "Buy" and AMBQ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for NVDA (target: $271) vs 4.2% for AMBQ (target: $32).
| Metric | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $271.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 79 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | $51M | $76M | +49.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 24.1% | 55.6% | +130.6% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | -49.5% | -52.1% | -5.4% |
NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) | -1.85 | -3.13 | -69.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021). Ambiq Micro, Inc. generated $-25M FCF in 2024 (+56% vs 2021).
NVDA vs AMBQ: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVDA or AMBQ a better buy right now?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 36.2x trailing P/E (21.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NVDA or AMBQ?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to -20.3% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus AMBQ's -20.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NVDA or AMBQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.73β versus Ambiq Micro, Inc.'s 2.81β — meaning AMBQ is approximately 63% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for NVIDIA Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NVDA or AMBQ?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus -52.1% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus -53.4% for AMBQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is NVDA or AMBQ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 52.9% to $271.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — NVDA or AMBQ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NVDA or AMBQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+225.3% 10Y return). Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a higher beta of 2.81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +225.3%, AMBQ: -20.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NVDA and AMBQ?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.