Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) vs Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | ONCO | Beta 1.22 vs SMMT's 1.40 |
| Dividends | ONCO | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; SMMT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SMMT | -19.8% vs ONCO's -96.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SMMT | -143.7% ROA vs ONCO's -249.7%, ROIC -163.4% vs -336.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Onconetix is a biotechnology company developing and commercializing therapies for various health conditions. It generates revenue primarily from its FDA-approved prostate treatment Entadfi, while also advancing a pipeline of vaccine candidates — including for pneumonia, universal flu, and norovirus — through licensing and development partnerships. The company's competitive advantage lies in its versatile nanoparticle vaccine platform licensed from Cincinnati Children's, which enables rapid development of vaccines for multiple infectious diseases.
Summit Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel antibiotics to treat serious infectious diseases. It generates revenue primarily through research collaborations and licensing agreements — with its lead candidate ridinilazole in Phase III trials for C. difficile infection — while pursuing future commercialization of its pipeline. The company's competitive advantage lies in its targeted approach to antibiotic-resistant infections and its clinical-stage assets addressing significant unmet medical needs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SMMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ONCO leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ONCO and SMMT operate at a comparable scale, with $1M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | -$812M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$324M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -113.3% | -2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $12.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -11.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.12x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 18.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMMT delivers a -163.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-164 in annual profit, vs $-15 for ONCO. SMMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONCO's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ONCO scores 3/9 vs SMMT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.6% | -163.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -143.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.4% | -163.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -140.8% | -151.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | -$204M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $646,500 | $225M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -49.30x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SMMT five years ago would be worth $25,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for ONCO. Over the past 12 months, SMMT leads with a -19.8% total return vs ONCO's -96.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMMT at 109.7% vs ONCO's -94.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.4% | -5.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.8% | -19.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +821.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +150.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +145.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.5% | +109.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ONCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMMT's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMMT currently trades 44.9% from its 52-week high vs ONCO's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.50 | $36.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.62 | $13.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.5 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
ONCO is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ONCOOnconetix, Inc. | SMMTSummit Therapeuti… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.39 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | 100 | 0 | -100.0% |
| Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) | 100 | 439.38 | +339.4% |
Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) returned +151% over 5 years vs Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in SMMT 5 years ago would be worth $25,060 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | $0.00 | $3M | — |
| Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) | $3M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
Summit Therapeutics Inc.'s revenue grew from $3M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | -639.9% | -23.3% | +96.4% |
| Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) | -19.0% | -111.9% | -488.8% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) | -0.07 | -1,823.25 | -2450504.8% |
| Summit Therapeutics… (SMMT) | -0.43 | -1.44 | -234.9% |
Summit Therapeutics Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.43 (2016) to $-1.44 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Onconetix, Inc. generated $-11M FCF in 2024 (-414% vs 2021). Summit Therapeutics Inc. generated $-324M FCF in 2025 (-344% vs 2021).
ONCO vs SMMT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONCO or SMMT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ONCO or SMMT?
Over the past 5 years, Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) delivered a total return of +150.6%, compared to -100.0% for Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO). A $10,000 investment in SMMT five years ago would be worth approximately $25K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMMT returned +145.8% versus ONCO's -100.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ONCO or SMMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.22β versus Summit Therapeutics Inc.'s 1.40β — meaning SMMT is approximately 15% more volatile than ONCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 98% for Onconetix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — ONCO or SMMT?
Summit Therapeutics Inc. (SMMT) is the more profitable company, earning 0.0% net margin versus -23.3% for Onconetix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMMT leads at 0.0% versus -22.4% for ONCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONCO leads at 41.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ONCO or SMMT?
In this comparison, ONCO (100.0% yield) pays a dividend. SMMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is ONCO or SMMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onconetix, Inc. (ONCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.22), 100.0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONCO: -100.0%, SMMT: +145.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ONCO and SMMT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ONCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SMMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ONCO pays a dividend while SMMT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.