Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Opera Limited (OPRA) vs trivago N.V. (TRVG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OPRA | 21.1% revenue growth vs TRVG's 19.1% |
| Value | OPRA | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 16.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | OPRA | 13.9% net margin vs TRVG's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | TRVG | Beta 1.21 vs OPRA's 1.54 |
| Dividends | OPRA | 3.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; TRVG pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OPRA | -25.5% vs TRVG's -29.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OPRA | 7.7% ROA vs TRVG's 3.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs 1.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Opera Limited is a web browser company offering mobile and desktop browsers with integrated services like news aggregation and gaming features. It generates revenue primarily through advertising—including its Opera Ads platform—and to a lesser extent from gaming services and browser-based cashback rewards. The company's advantage lies in its specialized browser offerings—particularly Opera GX for gamers—and its AI-powered news discovery service that creates a differentiated ecosystem beyond basic browsing.
Trivago operates a hotel and accommodation meta-search platform that compares prices across booking sites. It makes money primarily through cost-per-click advertising — when users click on hotel listings, trivago gets paid by online travel agencies and hotel partners. Its key advantage is brand recognition in hotel search and a massive database of accommodation options across 53 localized websites in 31 languages.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
OPRA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TRVG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
OPRA and TRVG operate at a comparable scale, with $583M and $549M in trailing revenue. OPRA is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRVG's 2.0%. On growth, TRVG holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $583M | $549M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $107M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $81M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $88M | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.4% | +97.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | +26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +191.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, OPRA trades at a 16% valuation discount to TRVG's 16.6x P/E.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | -$44M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.88x | 16.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.33x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.30x | -6.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.06x | 17.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRA delivers a 8.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for TRVG. OPRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRVG's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRA scores 6/9 vs TRVG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$117M | -$95M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $127M | $131M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $36M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 172.17x | 90.00x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth $13,275 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,657 for TRVG. Over the past 12 months, OPRA leads with a -25.5% total return vs TRVG's -29.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPRA at 19.5% vs TRVG's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.7% | +4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.5% | -29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.5% | -34.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | -73.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.1% | -90.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TRVG is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRA's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPRA currently trades 59.3% from its 52-week high vs TRVG's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.06 | $5.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.71 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.3% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 604K | 52K |
Analyst Outlook
OPRA is the only dividend payer here at 3.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | OPRAOpera Limited | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 100 | 173.86 | +73.9% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 29.9 | -70.1% |
Opera Limited (OPRA) returned +33% over 5 years vs trivago N.V. (TRVG)'s -73%. A $10,000 investment in OPRA 5 years ago would be worth $13,275 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | $107M | $481M | +348.0% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | $754M | $549M | -27.2% |
trivago N.V.'s revenue grew from $754M (2016) to $549M (2025) — a -3.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | -14.7% | 16.8% | +214.0% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -6.7% | 2.0% | +130.4% |
trivago N.V.'s net margin went from -7% (2016) to 2% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | 16.4 | 21 | +28.0% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 52.4 | 19.3 | -63.2% |
Opera Limited has traded in a 6x–45x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. trivago N.V. has traded in a 19x–73x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opera Limited (OPRA) | -0.14 | 0.9 | +742.9% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -1.05 | 0.15 | +114.3% |
trivago N.V.'s EPS grew from $-1.05 (2016) to $0.15 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Opera Limited generated $74M FCF in 2024 (+260% vs 2021). trivago N.V. generated $3M FCF in 2025 (-89% vs 2021).
OPRA vs TRVG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPRA or TRVG a better buy right now?
Opera Limited (OPRA) offers the better valuation at 13.9x trailing P/E (11.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Opera Limited (OPRA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPRA or TRVG?
On trailing P/E, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the cheapest at 13.9x versus trivago N.V. at 16.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPRA or TRVG?
Over the past 5 years, Opera Limited (OPRA) delivered a total return of +32.8%, compared to -73.4% for trivago N.V. (TRVG). A $10,000 investment in OPRA five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPRA returned +22.1% versus TRVG's -90.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPRA or TRVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.21β versus Opera Limited's 1.54β — meaning OPRA is approximately 27% more volatile than TRVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opera Limited (OPRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 17% for trivago N.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — OPRA or TRVG?
Opera Limited (OPRA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.8% net margin versus 2.0% for trivago N.V. — meaning it keeps 16.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRA leads at 19.2% versus 0.3% for TRVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRVG leads at 97.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — OPRA or TRVG?
In this comparison, OPRA (3.3% yield) pays a dividend. TRVG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is OPRA or TRVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Opera Limited (OPRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OPRA: +22.1%, TRVG: -90.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between OPRA and TRVG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. OPRA pays a dividend while TRVG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 13%
- Gross Margin > 58%