Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) vs PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PMTS | 8.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.8% |
| Value | PMTS | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 8.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | PYPL | 15.7% net margin vs PMTS's 4.1% |
| Stability / Safety | PMTS | Beta 1.28 vs PYPL's 1.30 |
| Dividends | PYPL | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; PMTS pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PYPL | -34.8% vs PMTS's -63.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PYPL | 6.5% ROA vs PMTS's 3.5%, ROIC 16.3% vs 19.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
CPI Card Group is a manufacturer and service provider of financial payment cards — primarily debit, credit, and prepaid cards — for banks and card issuers. It generates revenue from card production (physical cards) and integrated services like personalization, fulfillment, and instant issuance, with its Debit and Credit segment being the dominant contributor. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated service model — combining manufacturing with data personalization and fulfillment — which creates stickier customer relationships than pure card production alone.
PayPal operates a global digital payments platform that enables online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees — taking a percentage of each payment processed — with additional income from value-added services like PayPal Credit and merchant solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its massive two-sided network of over 400 million active accounts and merchants, creating powerful network effects that make it difficult for competitors to displace.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PYPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). PMTS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.3B annually — 69.4x PMTS's $481M. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PMTS's 4.1%.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $481M | $33.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $73M | $7.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $5.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +47.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.7% | +37.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, PMTS trades at a 12% valuation discount to PYPL's 8.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PMTS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PYPL's 5.9x.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $140M | $42.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $396M | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.48x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.82x | 8.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.99x | 5.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.10x | 7.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs PMTS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +25.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.9% | +16.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.2% | +19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $256M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $289M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.61x | 12.25x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PMTS five years ago would be worth $11,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,694 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, PYPL leads with a -34.8% total return vs PMTS's -63.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PYPL at -14.3% vs PMTS's -27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | -20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.3% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.0% | -37.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.6% | -83.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | +21.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.6% | -14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PMTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYPL's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PYPL currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs PMTS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.25 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.81 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.8% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PMTS as "Buy" and PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.0% upside for PMTS (target: $28) vs 14.8% for PYPL (target: $53). PYPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PMTSCPI Card Group In… | PYPLPayPal Holdings, … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.33 | $53.05 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | +14.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | 100 | 1,858.33 | +1758.3% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 48.46 | -51.5% |
CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) returned +13% over 5 years vs PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL)'s -83%. A $10,000 investment in PMTS 5 years ago would be worth $11,263 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | $309M | $481M | +55.7% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | $10.8B | $33.3B | +207.5% |
PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $10.8B (2016) to $33.3B (2025) — a 13.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | 1.7% | 4.1% | +132.2% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 12.9% | 15.7% | +21.5% |
PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 13% (2016) to 16% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | 3 | 18.2 | +506.7% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 50.1 | 10.8 | -78.4% |
CPI Card Group Inc. has traded in a 3x–18x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~7x. PayPal Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 11x–66x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~9x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) | 0.5 | 1.64 | +228.0% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 1.15 | 5.41 | +370.4% |
PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.15 (2016) to $5.41 (2025) — a 19% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
CPI Card Group Inc. generated $34M FCF in 2024 (+235% vs 2021). PayPal Holdings, Inc. generated $6B FCF in 2025 (+14% vs 2021).
PMTS vs PYPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMTS or PYPL a better buy right now?
CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) offers the better valuation at 7.5x trailing P/E (4.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMTS or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) is the cheapest at 7.5x versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. at 8.5x. On forward P/E, CPI Card Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 4.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMTS or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) delivered a total return of +12.6%, compared to -83.1% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). A $10,000 investment in PMTS five years ago would be worth approximately $11K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PYPL returned +21.5% versus PMTS's -65.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMTS or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning PYPL is approximately 2% more volatile than PMTS relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — PMTS or PYPL?
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.7% net margin versus 4.1% for CPI Card Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 15.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PYPL leads at 19.7% versus 13.1% for PMTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PYPL leads at 47.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PMTS or PYPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CPI Card Group Inc. (PMTS) trades at 4.8x forward P/E versus 8.7x for PayPal Holdings, Inc. — 3.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PMTS: 131.0% to $28.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — PMTS or PYPL?
In this comparison, PYPL (0.3% yield) pays a dividend. PMTS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is PMTS or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PYPL: +21.5%, PMTS: -65.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PMTS and PYPL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.