Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. (PTHS) vs ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | ADMA | 42.9% net margin vs PTHS's -318.4% |
| Stability / Safety | PTHS | Beta 0.76 vs ADMA's 1.10 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PTHS | +123.4% vs ADMA's -5.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ADMA | 36.8% ROA vs PTHS's -18.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Pelthos Therapeutics is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes therapeutic products for patients with unmet medical needs. It generates revenue primarily from sales of its FDA-approved treatment ZELSUVMI for molluscum contagiosum — a viral skin infection — with additional potential from its proprietary NITRICIL nitric oxide technology platform. The company's competitive advantage lies in its first-mover position with the only FDA-approved prescription treatment for molluscum contagiosum, addressing a significant market gap.
ADMA Biologics is a biopharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures, and markets specialty plasma-derived biologics for treating immune deficiencies and infectious diseases. It generates revenue primarily from sales of its intravenous immune globulin products — BIVIGAM and ASCENIV — along with its Hepatitis B treatment Nabi-HB, while also operating plasma collection facilities. The company's key advantage is its integrated business model that combines plasma collection, manufacturing, and commercialization, creating a vertically controlled supply chain for plasma-derived therapies.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PTHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ADMA is the larger business by revenue, generating $489M annually — 66.0x PTHS's $7M. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 42.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTHS's -3.2%.
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $489M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +42.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.95x | 19.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA delivers a 48.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $49 in annual profit, vs $-40 for PTHS. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADMA scores 7/9 vs PTHS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +48.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.7% | +36.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +37.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +39.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $513,443 | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.31x | 19.63x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $64,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,339 for PTHS. Over the past 12 months, PTHS leads with a +123.4% total return vs ADMA's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 63.7% vs PTHS's 30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.5% | -12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.4% | -5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +338.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +543.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +227.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +63.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PTHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ADMA's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADMA currently trades 60.7% from its 52-week high vs PTHS's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.29 | $25.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.20 | $13.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.6% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 35.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | PTHSPelthos Therapeut… | ADMAADMA Biologics, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelthos Therapeutic… (PTHS) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | $7M | $426M | +5841.4% |
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7M (2015) to $426M (2024) — a 57.4% CAGR.
Chart 2EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelthos Therapeutic… (PTHS) | -4.26 | -13.54 | -217.8% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | -1.73 | 0.81 | +146.8% |
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.73 (2015) to $0.81 (2024).
Chart 3Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. generated $-6M FCF in 2024 (-270% vs 2022). ADMA Biologics, Inc. generated $110M FCF in 2024 (+187% vs 2021).
PTHS vs ADMA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTHS or ADMA a better buy right now?
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) offers the better valuation at 19.2x trailing P/E (16.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PTHS or ADMA?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) delivered a total return of +543.4%, compared to +123.4% for Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. (PTHS). A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth approximately $64K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADMA returned +227.8% versus PTHS's +123.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PTHS or ADMA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. (PTHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.76β versus ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s 1.10β — meaning ADMA is approximately 46% more volatile than PTHS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — PTHS or ADMA?
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 46.4% net margin versus -318.4% for Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps 46.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADMA leads at 32.6% versus -300.5% for PTHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTHS leads at 54.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — PTHS or ADMA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is PTHS or ADMA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pelthos Therapeutics Inc. (PTHS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.76), +123.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTHS: +123.4%, ADMA: +227.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between PTHS and ADMA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.