Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PTRN | 31.5% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7% |
| Value | PTRN | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 26.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | MANH | 20.3% net margin vs PTRN's 3.8% |
| Stability / Safety | MANH | Beta 1.37 vs PTRN's 2.14 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MANH | -23.4% vs PTRN's -32.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MANH | 26.2% ROA vs PTRN's 11.7%, ROIC 236.8% vs 29.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Pattern Group is a tech-enabled ecommerce accelerator that helps brands grow sales across global online marketplaces like Amazon, Walmart, and TikTok Shop. It makes money through a combination of service fees — including technology, analytics, logistics, and advertising services — and product distribution margins from purchasing and selling products on behalf of brands. The company's moat lies in its integrated technology platform and global marketplace expertise, which creates a full-service ecosystem that's difficult for brands to replicate internally.
Manhattan Associates is a supply chain and omnichannel commerce software provider that helps companies manage inventory, logistics, and retail operations. It generates revenue primarily through software license sales (~40%), maintenance and support services (~35%), and professional implementation services (~25%). The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep domain expertise and integrated platform approach—spanning warehouse management, transportation, and omnichannel solutions—which creates switching costs for enterprise clients.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MANH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PTRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PTRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 1.7x MANH's $1.1B. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTRN's 3.8%.
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $286M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $374M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +55.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +34.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PTRN's 14.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MANH's 27.3x.
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.56x | 37.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.25x | 25.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.53x | 27.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 7.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.75x | 26.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.61x | 21.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 69.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $70 in annual profit, vs $20 for PTRN. PTRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANH's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs PTRN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.6% | +69.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +29.8% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.5% | +76.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$145M | -$216M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $329M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $112M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 889.61x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth $10,428 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,737 for PTRN. Over the past 12 months, MANH leads with a -23.4% total return vs PTRN's -32.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MANH at -2.0% vs PTRN's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.4% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.6% | -23.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.6% | -5.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.6% | +4.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.6% | +145.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.3% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
MANH is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTRN's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.14x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.10 | $247.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.92 | $127.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +54.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 830K | 696K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PTRN as "Buy" and MANH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.8% upside for PTRN (target: $20) vs 71.1% for MANH (target: $232).
| Metric | PTRNPattern Group Inc… | MANHManhattan Associa… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.88 | $231.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +3.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Group Inc. … (PTRN) | $1.4B | $1.8B | +31.5% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | $605M | $1.1B | +78.9% |
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s revenue grew from $605M (2016) to $1.1B (2025) — a 6.7% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Group Inc. … (PTRN) | 3.0% | 3.8% | +25.1% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 20.5% | 20.3% | -1.0% |
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 20% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 29.5 | 48.1 | +63.1% |
Manhattan Associates, Inc. has traded in a 27x–90x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~38x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern Group Inc. … (PTRN) | 0.12 | -1.23 | -1125.0% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 1.72 | 3.6 | +109.3% |
Manhattan Associates, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.72 (2016) to $3.60 (2025) — a 9% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock generated $50M FCF in 2024 (+85% vs 2023). Manhattan Associates, Inc. generated $374M FCF in 2025 (+106% vs 2021).
PTRN vs MANH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTRN or MANH a better buy right now?
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) offers the better valuation at 37.6x trailing P/E (26.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTRN or MANH?
On forward P/E, Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock is actually cheaper at 20.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTRN or MANH?
Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) delivered a total return of +4.3%, compared to -32.6% for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN). A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth approximately $10K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MANH returned +145.1% versus PTRN's -32.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTRN or MANH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.37β versus Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock's 2.14β — meaning PTRN is approximately 56% more volatile than MANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 36% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — PTRN or MANH?
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20.3% net margin versus 3.8% for Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock — meaning it keeps 20.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26.1% versus 4.9% for PTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANH leads at 55.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PTRN or MANH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) trades at 20.3x forward P/E versus 26.0x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 5.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PTRN: 88.8% to $19.88.
07Which pays a better dividend — PTRN or MANH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PTRN or MANH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+145.1% 10Y return). Pattern Group Inc. Series A Common Stock (PTRN) carries a higher beta of 2.14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MANH: +145.1%, PTRN: -32.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PTRN and MANH?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.