Compare Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Stock

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) offers the better valuation at 21.2x trailing P/E (14.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Perella Weinberg Partners is actually cheaper at 14.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) delivered a total return of +176.1%, compared to +86.8% for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth approximately $28K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +521.2% versus PWP's +100.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.36β versus Perella Weinberg Partners's 1.62β — meaning PWP is approximately 19% more volatile than GS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11.3% net margin versus -7.4% for Perella Weinberg Partners — meaning it keeps 11.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14.5% versus -8.9% for PWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) trades at 14.3x forward P/E versus 14.7x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — 0.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PWP: 14.8% to $21.25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) offers the highest yield at 2.1%, versus 1.6% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.6% yield, +521.2% 10Y return). Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) carries a higher beta of 1.62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GS: +521.2%, PWP: +100.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.