Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare QXO, Inc. (QXO) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | QXO | 119.3% revenue growth vs UBER's 18.3% |
| Value | UBER | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 61.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | UBER | 19.3% net margin vs QXO's -4.1% |
| Stability / Safety | UBER | Beta 1.12 vs QXO's 1.25 |
| Dividends | QXO | 71.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; UBER pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | QXO | +88.0% vs UBER's -0.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UBER | 16.3% ROA vs QXO's -1.8%, ROIC 13.6% vs -3.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
QXO is a business software and consulting firm that provides enterprise resource planning, accounting, and IT managed services to small and medium-sized businesses. It generates revenue through software licensing and subscriptions — primarily from its ERP and business management platforms — supplemented by consulting, training, and technical support services. The company's moat comes from its deep industry specialization in manufacturing and distribution sectors, where it offers integrated solutions that combine software with specialized consulting expertise.
Uber operates a global platform connecting riders with drivers for transportation and connecting consumers with restaurants and stores for delivery services. It generates revenue primarily from its Mobility segment — taking a commission from ride fares — and its Delivery segment — taking fees from restaurant and grocery orders, with both segments contributing roughly equal shares. Its key advantage is its massive two-sided network effect — the more drivers and restaurants on the platform, the better the service for consumers, creating a powerful moat that's difficult for competitors to replicate at scale.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
UBER leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.0B annually — 7.6x QXO's $6.8B. UBER is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QXO's -4.1%. On growth, QXO holds the edge at +147.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $52.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$279M | $10.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $183M | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +147.8% | +20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -95.6% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, UBER's 25.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QXO's 107.3x.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.0B | $156.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.1B | $162.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.02x | 16.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 61.60x | 22.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 107.27x | 25.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 5.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 92.62x | 16.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER delivers a 35.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-3 for QXO. QXO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs QXO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | +35.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$6.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $13.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.79x | 17.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $13,864 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,422 for QXO. Over the past 12 months, QXO leads with a +88.0% total return vs UBER's -0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 31.4% vs QXO's -38.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +88.0% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.8% | +38.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.0% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QXO's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QXO currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs UBER's 73.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.61 | $101.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.97 | $60.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.4M | 17.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QXO as "Buy" and UBER as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for UBER (target: $105) vs 25.3% for QXO (target: $30). QXO is the only dividend payer here at 71.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | QXOQXO, Inc. | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | $105.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +71.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $17.10 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QXO, Inc. (QXO) | 100 | 11.62 | -88.4% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 246.09 | +146.1% |
Uber Technologies, … (UBER) returned +39% over 5 years vs QXO, Inc. (QXO)'s -86%. A $10,000 investment in UBER 5 years ago would be worth $13,864 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QXO, Inc. (QXO) | $34M | $6.8B | +19952.2% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | $3.8B | $52.0B | +1252.8% |
QXO, Inc.'s revenue grew from $34M (2016) to $6.8B (2025) — a 80.2% CAGR. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s revenue grew from $3.8B (2016) to $52.0B (2025) — a 33.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QXO, Inc. (QXO) | 10.1% | -4.1% | -140.5% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | -9.6% | 19.3% | +300.8% |
QXO, Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2016) to -4% (2025). Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin went from -10% (2016) to 19% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2023 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 70.8 | 17.3 | -75.6% |
Uber Technologies, Inc. has traded in a 13x–71x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| QXO, Inc. (QXO) | 6.15 | -0.63 | -110.2% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | -0.24 | 4.71 | +2062.5% |
QXO, Inc.'s EPS grew from $6.15 (2016) to $-0.63 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.24 (2016) to $4.71 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
QXO, Inc. generated $183M FCF in 2025 (+164540% vs 2021). Uber Technologies, Inc. generated $10B FCF in 2025 (+1414% vs 2021).
QXO vs UBER: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QXO or UBER a better buy right now?
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) offers the better valuation at 16.0x trailing P/E (22.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QXO, Inc. (QXO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QXO or UBER?
On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QXO or UBER?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) delivered a total return of +38.6%, compared to -85.8% for QXO, Inc. (QXO). A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +81.4% versus QXO's -47.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QXO or UBER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1.12β versus QXO, Inc.'s 1.25β — meaning QXO is approximately 12% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QXO, Inc. (QXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — QXO or UBER?
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is the more profitable company, earning 19.3% net margin versus -4.1% for QXO, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10.7% versus -3.6% for QXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UBER leads at 39.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is QXO or UBER more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) trades at 22.4x forward P/E versus 61.6x for QXO, Inc. — 39.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBER: 39.3% to $105.04.
07Which pays a better dividend — QXO or UBER?
In this comparison, QXO (71.4% yield) pays a dividend. UBER does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is QXO or UBER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QXO, Inc. (QXO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.25), 71.4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QXO: -47.8%, UBER: +81.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between QXO and UBER?
These companies operate in different sectors (QXO (Industrials) and UBER (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: QXO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; UBER is a mid-cap deep-value stock. QXO pays a dividend while UBER does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.