Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) vs SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | REI | 1.5% revenue growth vs SD's -15.7% |
| Value | REI | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 10.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | SD | 42.4% net margin vs REI's -5.0% |
| Stability / Safety | SD | Beta 0.86 vs REI's 1.30 |
| Dividends | SD | 11.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; REI pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SD | +53.8% vs REI's +10.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SD | 10.7% ROA vs REI's -1.1%, ROIC 8.6% vs 8.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ring Energy is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on acquiring and developing properties in the Permian Basin of Texas and New Mexico. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil (roughly 80% of revenue) and natural gas production to end users, marketers, and other purchasers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated acreage position in low-decline, conventional Permian Basin assets that offer predictable production and development opportunities.
SandRidge Energy is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It generates revenue primarily from the sale of oil and natural gas production — with oil contributing roughly 60% and natural gas around 40% of total revenue — derived from its operated wells in Oklahoma and Kansas. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost operating structure and concentrated acreage position in mature, predictable basins that enable efficient development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). REI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
REI is the larger business by revenue, generating $324M annually — 2.1x SD's $156M. SD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REI's -5.0%. On growth, SD holds the edge at +32.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $324M | $156M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113M | $98M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$50M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +49.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +42.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | +24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.9% | +32.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -37.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 4.1x trailing earnings, REI trades at a 60% valuation discount to SD's 10.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, REI's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SD's 8.3x.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $292M | $645M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $679M | $547M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.15x | 10.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.81x | 10.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.93x | 8.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.67x | 13.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SD delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-2 for REI.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.9% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $387M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $389M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.25x | 69.60x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth $43,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,295 for REI. Over the past 12 months, SD leads with a +53.8% total return vs REI's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SD at 14.9% vs REI's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +54.9% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +53.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.9% | +51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | +336.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.4% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REI's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.42 | $17.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.72 | $8.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates REI as "Buy" and SD as "Hold". SD is the only dividend payer here at 11.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | REIRing Energy, Inc. | SDSandRidge Energy,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) | 100 | 82.61 | -17.4% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 100 | 729.17 | +629.2% |
SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) returned +336% over 5 years vs Ring Energy, Inc. (REI)'s -37%. A $10,000 investment in SD 5 years ago would be worth $43,649 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) | $31M | $366M | +1081.2% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | $769M | $125M | -83.7% |
Ring Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $31M (2015) to $366M (2024) — a 31.6% CAGR. SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s revenue grew from $769M (2015) to $125M (2024) — a -18.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) | -29.2% | 18.4% | +163.1% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -4.8% | 50.3% | +1145.1% |
Ring Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from -29% (2015) to 18% (2024). SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s net margin went from -5% (2015) to 50% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) | 463.3 | 4 | -99.1% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 14.6 | 6.9 | -52.7% |
Ring Energy, Inc. has traded in a 3x–463x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~4x. SandRidge Energy, Inc. has traded in a 3x–15x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~10x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) | -0.32 | 0.34 | +206.3% |
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -7.08 | 1.69 | +123.9% |
Ring Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.32 (2015) to $0.34 (2024). SandRidge Energy, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-7.08 (2015) to $1.69 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ring Energy, Inc. generated $38M FCF in 2024 (+95% vs 2021). SandRidge Energy, Inc. generated $48M FCF in 2024 (-52% vs 2021).
REI vs SD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REI or SD a better buy right now?
Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) offers the better valuation at 4.1x trailing P/E (8.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REI or SD?
On trailing P/E, Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) is the cheapest at 4.1x versus SandRidge Energy, Inc. at 10.4x. On forward P/E, Ring Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REI or SD?
Over the past 5 years, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) delivered a total return of +336.5%, compared to -37.1% for Ring Energy, Inc. (REI). A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SD returned +13.5% versus REI's -66.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REI or SD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.86β versus Ring Energy, Inc.'s 1.30β — meaning REI is approximately 52% more volatile than SD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — REI or SD?
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the more profitable company, earning 50.3% net margin versus 18.4% for Ring Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REI leads at 36.3% versus 26.5% for SD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REI leads at 44.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is REI or SD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ring Energy, Inc. (REI) trades at 8.8x forward P/E versus 10.4x for SandRidge Energy, Inc. — 1.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — REI or SD?
In this comparison, SD (11.1% yield) pays a dividend. REI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is REI or SD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.86), 11.1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SD: +13.5%, REI: -66.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between REI and SD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. SD pays a dividend while REI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.