Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare SAP SE (SAP) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | UBER | 18.3% revenue growth vs SAP's 3.4% |
| Value | UBER | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 27.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | SAP | 19.9% net margin vs UBER's 19.3% |
| Stability / Safety | SAP | Beta 0.86 vs UBER's 1.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SAP | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; UBER pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UBER | -0.8% vs SAP's -25.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UBER | 16.3% ROA vs SAP's 10.4%, ROIC 13.6% vs 16.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
SAP is a global enterprise software company that provides business applications, technology platforms, and cloud services for organizations worldwide. It generates revenue primarily through software licenses and cloud subscriptions — with cloud services now representing over 40% of total revenue — along with consulting and support services. The company's key advantage is its deep integration across business functions — from finance to supply chain to HR — creating switching costs and network effects within its large enterprise customer base.
Uber operates a global platform connecting riders with drivers for transportation and connecting consumers with restaurants and stores for delivery services. It generates revenue primarily from its Mobility segment — taking a commission from ride fares — and its Delivery segment — taking fees from restaurant and grocery orders, with both segments contributing roughly equal shares. Its key advantage is its massive two-sided network effect — the more drivers and restaurants on the platform, the better the service for consumers, creating a powerful moat that's difficult for competitors to replicate at scale.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). UBER leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
UBER and SAP operate at a comparable scale, with $52.0B and $36.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.9% (SAP) to 19.3% (UBER). On growth, UBER holds the edge at +20.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36.7B | $52.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.5B | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.3B | $10.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.4B | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.7% | -95.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, UBER trades at a 44% valuation discount to SAP's 28.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SAP's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UBER's 25.8x.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $234.7B | $156.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234.5B | $162.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.52x | 16.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.77x | 22.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.84x | 25.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.63x | 3.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.44x | 5.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.07x | 16.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER delivers a 35.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $16 for SAP. SAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBER's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs UBER's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +35.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.4% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.1% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.3% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$149M | -$6.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8.2B | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $13.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.94x | 17.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth $17,166 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,864 for UBER. Over the past 12 months, UBER leads with a -0.8% total return vs SAP's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 31.4% vs SAP's 22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.9% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.8% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.4% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.7% | +38.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.8% | +81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.4% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UBER's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 73.9% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.28 | $101.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $189.22 | $60.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.3% | +73.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.3 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 17.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SAP as "Buy" and UBER as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 106.1% upside for SAP (target: $415) vs 39.3% for UBER (target: $105). SAP is the only dividend payer here at 1.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SAPSAP SE | UBERUber Technologies… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $415.33 | $105.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +4.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 163.78 | +63.8% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 246.09 | +146.1% |
SAP SE (SAP) returned +72% over 5 years vs Uber Technologies, … (UBER)'s +39%. A $10,000 investment in SAP 5 years ago would be worth $17,166 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE (SAP) | $22.1B | $35.3B | +60.2% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | $3.8B | $52.0B | +1252.8% |
SAP SE's revenue grew from $22.1B (2016) to $35.3B (2025) — a 5.4% CAGR. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s revenue grew from $3.8B (2016) to $52.0B (2025) — a 33.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE (SAP) | 16.5% | 19.9% | +20.6% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | -9.6% | 19.3% | +300.8% |
SAP SE's net margin went from 17% (2016) to 20% (2025). Uber Technologies, Inc.'s net margin went from -10% (2016) to 19% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE (SAP) | 33.5 | 40.6 | +21.2% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 70.8 | 17.3 | -75.6% |
SAP SE has traded in a 29x–93x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x. Uber Technologies, Inc. has traded in a 13x–71x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE (SAP) | 3.03 | 5.99 | +97.7% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | -0.24 | 4.71 | +2062.5% |
SAP SE's EPS grew from $3.03 (2016) to $5.99 (2025) — a 8% CAGR. Uber Technologies, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.24 (2016) to $4.71 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
SAP SE generated $8B FCF in 2025 (+44% vs 2021). Uber Technologies, Inc. generated $10B FCF in 2025 (+1414% vs 2021).
SAP vs UBER: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAP or UBER a better buy right now?
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) offers the better valuation at 16.0x trailing P/E (22.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SAP SE (SAP) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAP or UBER?
On trailing P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is the cheapest at 16.0x versus SAP SE at 28.5x. On forward P/E, Uber Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAP or UBER?
Over the past 5 years, SAP SE (SAP) delivered a total return of +71.7%, compared to +38.6% for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAP returned +193.8% versus UBER's +81.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAP or UBER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAP SE (SAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.86β versus Uber Technologies, Inc.'s 1.12β — meaning UBER is approximately 30% more volatile than SAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SAP SE (SAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 48% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SAP or UBER?
SAP SE (SAP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.9% net margin versus 19.3% for Uber Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAP leads at 28.0% versus 10.7% for UBER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAP leads at 73.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SAP or UBER more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) trades at 22.4x forward P/E versus 27.8x for SAP SE — 5.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 106.1% to $415.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — SAP or UBER?
In this comparison, SAP (1.3% yield) pays a dividend. UBER does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SAP or UBER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SAP SE (SAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.86), 1.3% yield, +193.8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAP: +193.8%, UBER: +81.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SAP and UBER?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock; UBER is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SAP pays a dividend while UBER does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.