Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) vs Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CRGY | 22.1% revenue growth vs SD's -15.7% |
| Value | CRGY | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 10.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | SD | 42.4% net margin vs CRGY's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | SD | Beta 0.86 vs CRGY's 1.74 |
| Dividends | SD | 11.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CRGY's 4.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SD | +53.8% vs CRGY's -3.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SD | 10.7% ROA vs CRGY's 2.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs 1.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
SandRidge Energy is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It generates revenue primarily from the sale of oil and natural gas production — with oil contributing roughly 60% and natural gas around 40% of total revenue — derived from its operated wells in Oklahoma and Kansas. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost operating structure and concentrated acreage position in mature, predictable basins that enable efficient development.
Crescent Energy is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company operating across multiple U.S. basins. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids produced from its portfolio of assets in proven regions like the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Rockies. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large inventory of undrilled locations—over 1,500 gross locations—providing years of low-risk development opportunities.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CRGY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CRGY is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 23.0x SD's $156M. SD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRGY's 3.7%. On growth, SD holds the edge at +32.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $156M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $98M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $66M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.3% | +88.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.5% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.7% | +98.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, SD trades at a 52% valuation discount to CRGY's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRGY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SD's 8.3x.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $645M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $547M | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.37x | 21.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.37x | 9.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.32x | 6.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.15x | 1.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.57x | 2.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SD delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for CRGY. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRGY scores 6/9 vs SD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.7% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$98M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $290,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 69.60x | 2.92x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth $43,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,193 for CRGY. Over the past 12 months, SD leads with a +53.8% total return vs CRGY's -3.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SD at 14.9% vs CRGY's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | +37.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.8% | -3.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.7% | +14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.5% | -18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | -18.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SD is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRGY's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs CRGY's 90.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.87 | $12.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 252K | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SD as "Hold" and CRGY as "Buy". For income investors, SD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.10% vs CRGY's 4.03%.
| Metric | SDSandRidge Energy,… | CRGYCrescent Energy C… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.95 | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jan 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 100 | 141.38 | +41.4% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 79.96 | 56.06 | -29.9% |
SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) returned +336% over 5 years vs Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY)'s -18%. A $10,000 investment in SD 5 years ago would be worth $43,649 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | $769M | $125M | -83.7% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | $1.1B | $3.6B | +229.3% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -4.8% | 50.3% | +1145.1% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | -1.3% | 3.7% | +383.0% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | 14.6 | 6.9 | -52.7% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 5.4 | 15.5 | +187.0% |
SandRidge Energy, Inc. has traded in a 3x–15x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~10x. Crescent Energy Company has traded in a 5x–29x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SandRidge Energy, I… (SD) | -7.08 | 1.69 | +123.9% |
| Crescent Energy Com… (CRGY) | 0 | 0.54 | — |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
SandRidge Energy, Inc. generated $48M FCF in 2024 (-52% vs 2021). Crescent Energy Company generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+4576% vs 2021).
SD vs CRGY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SD or CRGY a better buy right now?
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the better valuation at 10.4x trailing P/E (10.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SD or CRGY?
On trailing P/E, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the cheapest at 10.4x versus Crescent Energy Company at 21.6x. On forward P/E, Crescent Energy Company is actually cheaper at 9.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SD or CRGY?
Over the past 5 years, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) delivered a total return of +336.5%, compared to -18.1% for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY). A $10,000 investment in SD five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SD returned +13.5% versus CRGY's -18.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SD or CRGY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.86β versus Crescent Energy Company's 1.74β — meaning CRGY is approximately 103% more volatile than SD relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — SD or CRGY?
SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the more profitable company, earning 50.3% net margin versus 3.7% for Crescent Energy Company — meaning it keeps 50.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SD leads at 26.5% versus 6.4% for CRGY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRGY leads at 88.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SD or CRGY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) trades at 9.2x forward P/E versus 10.4x for SandRidge Energy, Inc. — 1.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — SD or CRGY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) offers the highest yield at 11.1%, versus 4.0% for Crescent Energy Company (CRGY).
08Is SD or CRGY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.86), 11.1% yield). Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) carries a higher beta of 1.74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SD: +13.5%, CRGY: -18.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SD and CRGY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRGY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.