Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Solventum Corporation (SOLV) vs Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FMS | 1.5% revenue growth vs SOLV's 0.9% |
| Value | FMS | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 11.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | SOLV | 18.7% net margin vs FMS's 5.0% |
| Stability / Safety | FMS | Beta 0.40 vs SOLV's 0.97, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FMS | +0.2% vs SOLV's -7.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOLV | 10.9% ROA vs FMS's 3.2%, ROIC 16.9% vs 5.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Solventum is a healthcare company that develops, manufactures, and commercializes medical solutions across four main segments. It generates revenue primarily from medical surgical supplies (~40% of sales), dental products (~25%), health information systems software (~20%), and purification/filtration technologies (~15%). The company benefits from its established brand recognition and comprehensive product portfolio—spanning from wound care to dental orthodontics—which creates switching costs for healthcare providers.
Fresenius Medical Care is a global leader in dialysis care and products for patients with chronic kidney failure. It generates revenue through two main segments: dialysis services (about 75% of revenue) from its network of outpatient clinics and hospital contracts, and dialysis products (about 25%) including machines, dialyzers, and related supplies. The company's key advantage is its vertically integrated model—combining clinics, products, and services—which creates patient stickiness and economies of scale in the capital-intensive dialysis industry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
FMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). SOLV leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
FMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.6B annually — 2.4x SOLV's $8.3B. SOLV is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMS's 5.0%. On growth, FMS holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $19.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $978M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +105.6% | +8.5% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, SOLV trades at a 29% valuation discount to FMS's 11.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FMS's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOLV's 7.8x.
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.9B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.0B | $24.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.36x | 11.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.54x | 9.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.81x | 6.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOLV delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $7 for FMS. FMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.76x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOLV's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SOLV scores 6/9 vs FMS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.8% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.9% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.2B | $9.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $878M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $10.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.62x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SOLV five years ago would be worth $9,275 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,718 for FMS. Over the past 12 months, FMS leads with a +0.2% total return vs SOLV's -7.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMS at 9.1% vs SOLV's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.0% | +0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.2% | +29.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.2% | -28.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FMS is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOLV's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOLV currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs FMS's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.20 | $30.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.70 | $20.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +77.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 788K | 518K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SOLV as "Buy" and FMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 29.1% upside for SOLV (target: $96) vs 19.4% for FMS (target: $28).
| Metric | SOLVSolventum Corpora… | FMSFresenius Medical… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $95.80 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 100 | 96.14 | -3.9% |
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 100 | 118.39 | +18.4% |
Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) returned -7% over 5 years vs Fresenius Medical C… (FMS)'s -23%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | $8.2B | $8.3B | +1.9% |
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | $17.0B | $19.6B | +15.3% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's revenue grew from $17.0B (2016) to $19.6B (2025) — a 1.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 17.9% | 18.7% | +4.6% |
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 6.9% | 5.0% | -28.2% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's net margin went from 7% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 25.3 | 14.2 | -43.9% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA has traded in a 10x–39x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~12x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 8.47 | 8.88 | +4.8% |
| Fresenius Medical C… (FMS) | 1.87 | 1.68 | -10.2% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA's EPS grew from $1.87 (2016) to $1.68 (2025) — a -1% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Solventum Corporation generated $-10M FCF in 2025 (-101% vs 2021). Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021).
SOLV vs FMS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOLV or FMS a better buy right now?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) offers the better valuation at 8.4x trailing P/E (11.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solventum Corporation (SOLV) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOLV or FMS?
On trailing P/E, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the cheapest at 8.4x versus Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA at 11.8x. On forward P/E, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is actually cheaper at 9.9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOLV or FMS?
Over the past 5 years, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) delivered a total return of -7.3%, compared to -22.8% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS). A $10,000 investment in SOLV five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOLV returned -7.2% versus FMS's -28.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOLV or FMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.40β versus Solventum Corporation's 0.97β — meaning SOLV is approximately 141% more volatile than FMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 76% versus 100% for Solventum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SOLV or FMS?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the more profitable company, earning 18.7% net margin versus 5.0% for Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA — meaning it keeps 18.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOLV leads at 26.2% versus 9.3% for FMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOLV leads at 53.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SOLV or FMS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) trades at 9.9x forward P/E versus 11.5x for Solventum Corporation — 1.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOLV: 29.1% to $95.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — SOLV or FMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SOLV or FMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.40)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FMS: -28.5%, SOLV: -7.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SOLV and FMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.