Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) vs Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CEG | 8.3% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9% |
| Quality / Margins | CEG | 9.1% net margin vs SUUN's -7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SUUN | Beta 0.56 vs CEG's 1.70 |
| Dividends | CEG | 0.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; SUUN pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CEG | +32.3% vs SUUN's -78.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CEG | 4.1% ROA vs SUUN's -2.6%, ROIC 11.9% vs -11.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
PowerBank Corporation develops and operates solar power generation projects in Ontario and New York. It makes money primarily from selling electricity generated by its behind-the-meter solar installations, community solar gardens, and utility-scale solar farms — with long-term power purchase agreements providing stable revenue. The company's competitive advantage lies in its expertise in navigating complex permitting and grid interconnection processes for solar projects in regulated markets.
Constellation Energy is a major clean energy company that generates and sells electricity—primarily from nuclear, wind, and solar assets—across multiple U.S. power regions. It makes money by selling electricity and natural gas to utilities, municipalities, and commercial/industrial customers, with its nuclear fleet providing stable baseload power. The company's key advantage is its massive, low-carbon generation portfolio—including the nation's largest nuclear fleet—which gives it scale and operational efficiency in the transition to clean energy.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SUUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
CEG is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.5B annually — 519.7x SUUN's $49M. CEG is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUUN's -7.5%. On growth, SUUN holds the edge at +27.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $25.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$500,554 | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +75.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.2% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.4% | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.6% | -49.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34M | $103.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $108.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.10x | 44.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 6.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CEG delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-15 for SUUN. CEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SUUN's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEG scores 7/9 vs SUUN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.7% | +11.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.81x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.52x | 6.04x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CEG five years ago would be worth $79,651 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,551 for SUUN. Over the past 12 months, CEG leads with a +32.3% total return vs SUUN's -78.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CEG at 64.6% vs SUUN's -46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.9% | -9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.1% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +345.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +696.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +696.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.3% | +64.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SUUN is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEG's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CEG currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs SUUN's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.99 | $412.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $161.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.6 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CEG is the only dividend payer here at 0.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $415.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | 100 | 30.94 | -69.1% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 100 | 146.77 | +46.8% |
Constellation Energ… (CEG) returned +697% over 5 years vs PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN)'s -84%. A $10,000 investment in CEG 5 years ago would be worth $79,651 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | $7M | $42M | +465.3% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | $17.8B | $25.5B | +43.8% |
Constellation Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $17.8B (2016) to $25.5B (2025) — a 4.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | -1.8% | -74.7% | -4058.7% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 2.7% | 9.1% | +233.9% |
Constellation Energy Corporation's net margin went from 3% (2016) to 9% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2023 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 23.3 | 47.7 | +104.7% |
Constellation Energy Corporation has traded in a 19x–48x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~45x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | -0.01 | -0.97 | -11572.3% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 1.48 | 7.4 | +400.0% |
Constellation Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $1.48 (2016) to $7.40 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
PowerBank Corporation generated $-26M FCF in 2025 (-849% vs 2021). Constellation Energy Corporation generated $1B FCF in 2025 (-34% vs 2021).
SUUN vs CEG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUUN or CEG a better buy right now?
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) offers the better valuation at 44.6x trailing P/E (28.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SUUN or CEG?
Over the past 5 years, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) delivered a total return of +696.5%, compared to -84.5% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). A $10,000 investment in CEG five years ago would be worth approximately $80K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CEG returned +696.5% versus SUUN's -84.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SUUN or CEG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.56β versus Constellation Energy Corporation's 1.70β — meaning CEG is approximately 203% more volatile than SUUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 4% for PowerBank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SUUN or CEG?
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) is the more profitable company, earning 9.1% net margin versus -74.7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 9.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CEG leads at 12.1% versus -20.3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEG leads at 75.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SUUN or CEG?
In this comparison, CEG (0.5% yield) pays a dividend. SUUN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is SUUN or CEG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.56)). Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) carries a higher beta of 1.70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUUN: -84.5%, CEG: +696.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SUUN and CEG?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.