Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) vs ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RNW | 19.4% revenue growth vs SUUN's -28.9% |
| Quality / Margins | RNW | 9.2% net margin vs SUUN's -7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | RNW | Beta 0.52 vs SUUN's 0.56 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RNW | -12.4% vs SUUN's -78.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RNW | 1.2% ROA vs SUUN's -2.6%, ROIC 4.9% vs -11.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
PowerBank Corporation develops and operates solar power generation projects in Ontario and New York. It makes money primarily from selling electricity generated by its behind-the-meter solar installations, community solar gardens, and utility-scale solar farms — with long-term power purchase agreements providing stable revenue. The company's competitive advantage lies in its expertise in navigating complex permitting and grid interconnection processes for solar projects in regulated markets.
ReNew Energy Global is a leading Indian renewable energy company that develops, builds, owns, and operates utility-scale wind and solar power projects. It generates revenue primarily through long-term power purchase agreements — selling electricity to utilities and commercial customers — supplemented by engineering and maintenance services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale as India's largest renewable energy developer, with a diversified portfolio across wind and solar that benefits from India's ambitious clean energy transition.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
RNW leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SUUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
RNW is the larger business by revenue, generating $129.7B annually — 2639.0x SUUN's $49M. RNW is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SUUN's -7.5%. On growth, RNW holds the edge at +37.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $129.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$500,554 | $86.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $12.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | -$23.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +77.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +48.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.2% | -18.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.4% | +37.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.6% | +94.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $9.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.10x | 46.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.73x | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RNW delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-15 for SUUN. SUUN carries lower financial leverage with a 3.81x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RNW's 5.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNW scores 4/9 vs SUUN's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.0% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.7% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.9% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.81x | 5.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $691.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $40.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $732.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.52x | 86.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in RNW five years ago would be worth $5,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,551 for SUUN. Over the past 12 months, RNW leads with a -12.4% total return vs SUUN's -78.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RNW at 8.3% vs SUUN's -46.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.9% | -5.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.1% | -12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | +27.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | -49.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.5% | -49.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.3% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RNW is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUUN's 0.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNW currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs SUUN's 15.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.99 | $8.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $5.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.6% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.6 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 780K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SUUNPowerBank Corpora… | RNWReNew Energy Glob… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | 100 | 30.94 | -69.1% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 100 | 95.41 | -4.6% |
ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) returned -50% over 5 years vs PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN)'s -84%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | $7M | $42M | +465.3% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | $13.1B | $97.1B | +642.5% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | -1.8% | -74.7% | -4058.7% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 2.6% | 3.9% | +51.9% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| PowerBank Corporati… (SUUN) | -0.01 | -0.97 | -11572.3% |
| ReNew Energy Global… (RNW) | 1.13 | 10.92 | +866.4% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
PowerBank Corporation generated $-26M FCF in 2025 (-849% vs 2021). ReNew Energy Global Plc generated $-26B FCF in 2024 (+45% vs 2021).
SUUN vs RNW: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUUN or RNW a better buy right now?
ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) offers the better valuation at 46.0x trailing P/E (0.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SUUN or RNW?
Over the past 5 years, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) delivered a total return of -49.6%, compared to -84.5% for PowerBank Corporation (SUUN). A $10,000 investment in RNW five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RNW returned -49.4% versus SUUN's -84.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SUUN or RNW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.52β versus PowerBank Corporation's 0.56β — meaning SUUN is approximately 8% more volatile than RNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PowerBank Corporation (SUUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for ReNew Energy Global Plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SUUN or RNW?
ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the more profitable company, earning 3.9% net margin versus -74.7% for PowerBank Corporation — meaning it keeps 3.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNW leads at 53.5% versus -20.3% for SUUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RNW leads at 91.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SUUN or RNW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is SUUN or RNW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReNew Energy Global Plc (RNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.52)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNW: -49.4%, SUUN: -84.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SUUN and RNW?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.