Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
T logo
T
TMUS logo
TMUS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

T vs TMUS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals30-year financialsFull price history
T
AT&T Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$174.50B
5Y Perf.+42.0%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$177.73B
5Y Perf.+4.9%

T vs TMUS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
T logoT
TMUS logoTMUS
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$174.50B$177.73B
Revenue (TTM)$127.24B$92.19B
Net Income (TTM)$21.49B$10.56B
Gross Margin59.7%54.5%
Operating Margin20.4%20.3%
Forward P/E10.7x14.9x
Total Debt$173.99B$122.27B
Cash & Equiv.$18.23B$5.60B

T vs TMUSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

T
TMUS
StockSep 20Sep 26Return
AT&T Inc. (T)100116.7+16.7%
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)100142.0+42.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: T vs TMUS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: T leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. T-Mobile US, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇T emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
T
AT&T Inc.
The Income Pick

T carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.33, yield 4.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta -0.33, current ratio 0.91x
  • Beta -0.33, yield 4.5%, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
The Growth Play

TMUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 8.5%, EPS growth 0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
  • 267.0% 10Y total return vs T's 33.0%
  • 8.5% revenue growth vs T's 2.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTMUS logoTMUS8.5% revenue growth vs T's 2.7%
ValueT logoTLower P/E (10.9x vs 15.4x)
Quality / MarginsT logoT16.9% margin vs TMUS's 11.5%
Stability / SafetyT logoTLower D/E ratio (135.4% vs 206.5%)
DividendsT logoT4.5% yield, vs TMUS's 2.2%
Momentum (1Y)T logoT-9.3% vs TMUS's -29.9%
Efficiency (ROA)T logoT5.1% ROA vs TMUS's 4.9%, ROIC 6.9% vs 8.1%

T vs TMUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TAT&T Inc.
FY 2025
Wireless Service
55.8%$70.1B
Other Capitalized Property Plant and Equipment
19.5%$24.5B
Business Service
12.7%$16.0B
Legacy Voice and Data
8.2%$10.4B
IP Broadband
2.8%$3.5B
Other Service
0.9%$1.2B
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Postpaid Revenue
65.6%$57.9B
Product, Equipment
18.1%$16.0B
Branded Prepaid Revenue
11.9%$10.5B
Wholesale Service Revenue
3.3%$2.9B
Product and Service, Other
1.2%$1.0B

T vs TMUS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTLAGGINGTMUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

T and TMUS operate at a comparable scale, with $127.2B and $92.2B in trailing revenue. T is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TMUS's 11.5%. On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$127.2B$92.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$46.3B$30.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$21.5B$10.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10.9B$7.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+59.7%+54.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.4%+20.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.9%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.5%+8.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.3%+7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.5%+5.3%
T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

T leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, T trades at a 51% valuation discount to TMUS's 17.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, T's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TMUS's 9.1x.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$174.5B$177.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$330.2B$294.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.38x17.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.74x14.89x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.20x9.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.39x2.01x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.42x3.17x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.98x17.18x
T leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TMUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TMUS delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $17 for T. T carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), T scores 7/9 vs TMUS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.8%+18.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.1%+4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.9%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%+9.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.35x2.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$155.8B$116.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18.2B$5.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$174.0B$122.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.97x5.06x
TMUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $15,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,514 for TMUS. Over the past 12 months, T leads with a -9.3% total return vs TMUS's -29.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 23.5% vs TMUS's 7.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.7%-17.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.3%-29.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+88.2%+23.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.8%+35.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.0%+267.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.5%+7.4%
T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

T is the less volatile stock with a -0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TMUS's -0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. T currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs TMUS's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.33x-0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.44$242.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.89$161.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.3%+67.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.133.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded51.0M4.7M
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — T and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates T as "Hold" and TMUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for TMUS (target: $233) vs 4.2% for T (target: $27). For income investors, T offers the higher dividend yield at 4.47% vs TMUS's 2.20%.

MetricT logoTAT&T Inc.TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.53$233.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts6254
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.5%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.14$3.64
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.8%+5.7%
Evenly matched — T and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

T leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TMUS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallAT&T Inc. (T)Leads 4 of 6 categories

Custom Comparison: T vs TMUS

Compare on any lens — Growth, Value, Income, or pick from 130+ individual metrics.

View as:

T vs TMUS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is T or TMUS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is the stronger pick with 8. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. (T). AT&T Inc. (T) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — T or TMUS?

On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc.

(T) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 17. 0x. On forward P/E, AT&T Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — T or TMUS?

Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.

(T) delivered a total return of +52. 8%, compared to +35. 1% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +267. 0% versus T's +33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — T or TMUS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.

(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 33β versus T-Mobile US, Inc. 's -0. 33β — meaning TMUS is approximately -1% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AT&T Inc. (T) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — T or TMUS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is pulling ahead at 8. 5% versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. (T). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AT&T Inc. grew EPS 104. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for T-Mobile US, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TMUS leads at 3. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — T or TMUS?

AT&T Inc.

(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus 12. 4% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus 19. 9% for T. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 59. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is T or TMUS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AT&T Inc.

(T) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for T-Mobile US, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TMUS: 40. 7% to $233. 10.

08

Which pays a better dividend — T or TMUS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

AT&T Inc. (T) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 2. 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).

09

Is T or TMUS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 33), 2. 2% yield, +267. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +267. 0%, T: +33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between T and TMUS?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Related Comparisons

Other popular comparisons that include one of these companies.

Financial Data & Software Notice: VCP Scanner is an educational financial research database and stock screening software platform. VCP Scanner does not generate, recommend, or package trade decisions, buy/sell signals, or personalized investment advice. Side-by-side metric comparisons analyze public fundamental data for analytical evaluation. See our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.