Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) vs Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) vs AT&T Inc. (T) vs América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMX) vs Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TBB | 2.7% revenue growth vs AMX's 1.8% |
| Value | AMX | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 12.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | TBB | 17.4% net margin vs VOD's -4.1% |
| Stability / Safety | VZ | Beta 0.10 vs VOD's 0.36 |
| Dividends | VZ | 5.4% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs AMX's 2.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMX | +86.8% vs TBB's +0.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TBB | 5.2% ROA vs VOD's -2.2%, ROIC 7.0% vs -0.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
AT&T is a major telecommunications company providing wireless, broadband, and entertainment services primarily in the United States. It generates revenue through wireless service subscriptions (~60% of revenue), broadband and video services (~25%), and business wireline solutions (~15%). The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive nationwide wireless network infrastructure and spectrum portfolio, which creates high barriers to entry.
Verizon is a telecommunications giant providing wireless and wireline connectivity services to consumers and businesses across the United States. It generates revenue primarily from wireless service plans (~70% of total revenue) and equipment sales, supplemented by Fios broadband, video, and business solutions. The company's key advantage is its extensive nationwide network infrastructure—particularly its 5G leadership—which creates high switching costs for customers and barriers to entry for competitors.
AT&T is a major telecommunications company providing wireless, broadband, and enterprise connectivity services across the United States and Latin America. It generates revenue primarily from wireless services (~60% of total), broadband internet, and business solutions including cloud and security services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive nationwide wireless network infrastructure and fiber footprint, which create significant switching costs for customers and high barriers to entry for competitors.
América Móvil is a Latin American telecommunications giant providing wireless and fixed-line services across the region. It generates revenue primarily from mobile services (~60% of sales), fixed-line services (~25%), and pay-TV/broadband (~15%) through its extensive network infrastructure. The company's key advantage is its massive scale and first-mover position — it operates the largest wireless network in Latin America with over 300 million subscribers, creating significant network effects and cost advantages.
Vodafone is a multinational telecommunications company providing mobile, fixed-line, and converged connectivity services across Europe and Africa. It generates revenue primarily from mobile services (~60% of service revenue), fixed broadband and TV, and its African mobile money platform M-Pesa — which has become a significant growth driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive European network infrastructure and its entrenched position in African markets where M-Pesa has created a powerful financial services ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AMX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). VOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $939.7B annually — 12.7x VOD's $74.2B. TBB is the more profitable business, keeping 17.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VOD's -4.1%. On growth, VOD holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $125.6B | $138.5B | $125.6B | $939.7B | $74.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45.0B | $47.8B | $45.0B | $372.8B | $21.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.9B | $17.2B | $21.9B | $82.5B | -$3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19.4B | $23.1B | $19.4B | $173.3B | $21.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.8% | +55.6% | +79.8% | +42.9% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +21.2% | +19.2% | +20.5% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +12.4% | +17.4% | +8.8% | -4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +16.7% | +15.5% | +18.4% | +29.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +1.5% | +3.6% | -2.1% | +29.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.1% | +50.0% | -7.1% | +98.1% | -4.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, TBB trades at a 57% valuation discount to AMX's 17.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TBB's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.3x.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139.3B | $211.4B | $196.0B | $78.4B | $35.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $276.1B | $393.0B | $332.8B | $129.7B | $89.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.46x | 12.35x | 9.21x | 17.38x | -8.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.93x | 10.22x | 12.26x | 0.80x | 16.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.89x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 8.25x | 7.39x | 6.29x | 7.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 1.53x | 1.56x | 1.53x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 2.01x | 1.59x | 3.16x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.17x | 10.51x | 10.08x | 11.19x | 3.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMX delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-5 for VOD. VOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMX's 2.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBB scores 7/9 vs VOD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +16.3% | +17.3% | +19.3% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +4.3% | +5.2% | +4.6% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +8.0% | +7.0% | +11.2% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.8% | +6.8% | +14.3% | -0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.23x | 1.90x | 1.23x | 2.14x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136.8B | $181.5B | $136.8B | $883.7B | $45.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18.2B | $19.0B | $18.2B | $35.0B | $11.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155.0B | $200.6B | $155.0B | $918.8B | $57.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.55x | 4.37x | 3.55x | 2.54x | -0.18x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AMX five years ago would be worth $39,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,207 for VOD. Over the past 12 months, AMX leads with a +86.8% total return vs TBB's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMX at 33.8% vs TBB's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.0% | +25.4% | +15.1% | +25.9% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.5% | +22.7% | +6.2% | +86.8% | +80.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.7% | +49.9% | +65.7% | +139.5% | +46.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.5% | +14.4% | +62.8% | +290.7% | +12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.6% | +48.3% | +59.8% | +284.0% | -12.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.4% | +14.5% | +18.3% | +33.8% | +13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VOD's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs TBB's 93.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.10x | 0.12x | 0.34x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.16 | $50.48 | $29.79 | $26.05 | $15.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.55 | $10.60 | $22.95 | $13.10 | $8.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.9% | +99.3% | +94.0% | +99.9% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 66.9 | 55.6 | 76.0 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 28.1M | 36.9M | 2.0M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBB as "Hold", VZ as "Hold", T as "Hold", AMX as "Buy", VOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.0% upside for T (target: $29) vs -24.6% for VOD (target: $12). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.41% vs AMX's 2.30%.
| Metric | TBBAT&T Inc. 5.35% G… | VZVerizon Communica… | TAT&T Inc. | AMXAmérica Móvil, S.… | VODVodafone Group Pu… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $49.36 | $29.12 | $23.95 | $11.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 60 | 61 | 24 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.0% | +5.4% | +4.1% | +2.3% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $2.71 | $1.14 | $10.29 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% | +2.3% | +0.8% | +6.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 100 | 86.76 | -13.2% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 77.83 | -22.2% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 93.73 | -6.3% |
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | 100 | 125.79 | +25.8% |
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | 100 | 85.89 | -14.1% |
América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) returned +291% over 5 years vs Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD)'s +12%. A $10,000 investment in AMX 5 years ago would be worth $39,073 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | $163.8B | $125.6B | -23.3% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | $126.0B | $138.2B | +9.7% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | $163.8B | $125.6B | -23.3% |
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | $975.4B | $885.1B | -9.3% |
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | $52.0B | $37.4B | -27.9% |
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66's revenue grew from $163.8B (2016) to $125.6B (2025) — a -2.9% CAGR. Verizon Communications Inc.'s revenue grew from $126.0B (2016) to $138.2B (2025) — a 1.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 7.9% | 17.4% | +119.9% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 10.4% | 12.4% | +19.3% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 7.9% | 17.4% | +119.9% |
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | 0.9% | 8.8% | +889.8% |
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | -9.8% | -11.1% | -13.4% |
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66's net margin went from 8% (2016) to 17% (2025). Verizon Communications Inc.'s net margin went from 10% (2016) to 12% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 5.5 | 7.3 | +32.7% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 7.2 | 10 | +38.9% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 6.2 | 8.2 | +32.3% |
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | 1.9 | 0.8 | -57.9% |
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | 12.1 | 20.2 | +66.9% |
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 has traded in a 6x–16x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~7x. Verizon Communications Inc. has traded in a 7x–15x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~12x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 2.1 | 3.04 | +44.8% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 3.21 | 4.06 | +26.5% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 2.1 | 3.04 | +44.8% |
| América Móvil, S.A.… (AMX) | 2.6 | 25.8 | +892.3% |
| Vodafone Group Publ… (VOD) | -1.9 | -1.6 | +15.8% |
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66's EPS grew from $2.10 (2016) to $3.04 (2025) — a 4% CAGR. Verizon Communications Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.21 (2016) to $4.06 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 generated $19B FCF in 2025 (+97% vs 2021). Verizon Communications Inc. generated $20B FCF in 2025 (+173% vs 2021).
TBB vs VZ vs T vs AMX vs VOD: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD a better buy right now?
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) offers the better valuation at 7.5x trailing P/E (9.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD?
On trailing P/E, AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the cheapest at 7.5x versus América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. at 17.4x. On forward P/E, América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. is actually cheaper at 0.8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD?
Over the past 5 years, América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMX) delivered a total return of +290.7%, compared to +12.1% for Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD). A $10,000 investment in AMX five years ago would be worth approximately $39K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMX returned +284.0% versus VOD's -12.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.10β versus Vodafone Group Public Limited Company's 0.36β — meaning VOD is approximately 259% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vodafone Group Public Limited Company (VOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 2% for América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD?
AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB NTS 66 (TBB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.4% net margin versus -11.1% for Vodafone Group Public Limited Company — meaning it keeps 17.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21.2% versus -1.1% for VOD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBB leads at 79.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMX) trades at 0.8x forward P/E versus 16.4x for Vodafone Group Public Limited Company — 15.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for T: 4.0% to $29.12.
07Which pays a better dividend — TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5.4%, versus 2.3% for América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (AMX).
08Is TBB or VZ or T or AMX or VOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.10), 5.4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +48.3%, VOD: -12.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TBB and VZ and T and AMX and VOD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TBB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VZ is a large-cap deep-value stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VOD is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 2.0%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 7%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.6%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 5%
- Dividend Yield > 0.9%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 14%
- Gross Margin > 20%