Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) vs Asana, Inc. (ASAN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEAM | 19.7% revenue growth vs ASAN's 10.9% |
| Value | TEAM | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 27.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | TEAM | -3.3% net margin vs ASAN's -28.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TEAM | Beta 1.43 vs ASAN's 1.70, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ASAN | -63.1% vs TEAM's -73.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEAM | -3.1% ROA vs ASAN's -26.1%, ROIC -110.3% vs -58.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Atlassian is a software company that provides collaboration and productivity tools for software development and project management teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its cloud-based products — Jira, Confluence, Trello, and Bitbucket — with cloud subscriptions now representing over 90% of total revenue. The company's moat lies in its deeply embedded ecosystem within development workflows, creating high switching costs as teams coordinate work across its interconnected tools.
Asana operates a cloud-based work management platform that helps teams organize, track, and manage their work—from daily tasks to strategic initiatives. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its SaaS platform, with tiered pricing for individuals, teams, and enterprise customers. The company benefits from strong network effects within organizations and a user-friendly interface that drives adoption and reduces switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TEAM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). ASAN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TEAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 7.4x ASAN's $774M. TEAM is the more profitable business, keeping -3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASAN's -28.3%. On growth, TEAM holds the edge at +23.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $774M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$79M | -$175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$189M | -$219M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | +89.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -25.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | -16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.1B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -76.66x | -6.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.82x | 27.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.62x | 7.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.05x | 176.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TEAM delivers a -11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-12 in annual profit, vs $-116 for ASAN. TEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ASAN's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TEAM scores 7/9 vs ASAN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.9% | -116.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -26.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -110.3% | -58.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | -49.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $268M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.72x | -65.67x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth $2,987 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,920 for ASAN. Over the past 12 months, ASAN leads with a -63.1% total return vs TEAM's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASAN at -21.7% vs TEAM's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.5% | -45.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -63.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.3% | -52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.1% | -80.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.1% | -75.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.0% | -21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
TEAM is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASAN's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASAN currently trades 36.3% from its 52-week high vs TEAM's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $287.26 | $19.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $67.85 | $6.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.2% | +36.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TEAM as "Buy" and ASAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 149.4% upside for TEAM (target: $187) vs 87.2% for ASAN (target: $13).
| Metric | TEAMAtlassian Corpora… | ASANAsana, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $187.35 | $13.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.9% | +4.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Oct 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 100 | 61.13 | -38.9% |
| Asana, Inc. (ASAN) | 90.73 | 34.41 | -62.1% |
Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) returned -70% over 5 years vs Asana, Inc. (ASAN)'s -81%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | $457M | $5.2B | +1041.1% |
| Asana, Inc. (ASAN) | $77M | $724M | +842.9% |
Atlassian Corporation's revenue grew from $457M (2016) to $5.2B (2025) — a 31.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 1.0% | -4.9% | -614.4% |
| Asana, Inc. (ASAN) | -66.3% | -35.3% | +46.8% |
Atlassian Corporation's net margin went from 1% (2016) to -5% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corporati… (TEAM) | 0.02 | -0.98 | -5000.0% |
| Asana, Inc. (ASAN) | -0.34 | -1.11 | -226.5% |
Atlassian Corporation's EPS grew from $0.02 (2016) to $-0.98 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Atlassian Corporation generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+76% vs 2021). Asana, Inc. generated $9M FCF in 2025 (+106% vs 2021).
TEAM vs ASAN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TEAM or ASAN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TEAM or ASAN?
Over the past 5 years, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) delivered a total return of -70.1%, compared to -80.8% for Asana, Inc. (ASAN). A $10,000 investment in TEAM five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEAM returned +216.1% versus ASAN's -75.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TEAM or ASAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.43β versus Asana, Inc.'s 1.70β — meaning ASAN is approximately 19% more volatile than TEAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 118% for Asana, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — TEAM or ASAN?
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the more profitable company, earning -4.9% net margin versus -35.3% for Asana, Inc. — meaning it keeps -4.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEAM leads at -2.5% versus -36.8% for ASAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASAN leads at 89.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is TEAM or ASAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) trades at 15.8x forward P/E versus 27.7x for Asana, Inc. — 11.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEAM: 149.4% to $187.35.
06Which pays a better dividend — TEAM or ASAN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TEAM or ASAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+216.1% 10Y return). Asana, Inc. (ASAN) carries a higher beta of 1.70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEAM: +216.1%, ASAN: -75.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TEAM and ASAN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.