Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TIM S.A. (TIMB) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs TIMB's 4.6% |
| Value | TIMB | Lower P/E (2.9x vs 26.4x), PEG 0.15 vs 0.80 |
| Quality / Margins | NFLX | 24.3% net margin vs TIMB's 16.2% |
| Stability / Safety | TIMB | Beta 0.43 vs NFLX's 0.78 |
| Dividends | TIMB | 7.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; NFLX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TIMB | +109.1% vs NFLX's -16.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NFLX | 19.8% ROA vs TIMB's 7.6%, ROIC 29.8% vs 13.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TIM S.A. is a major Brazilian telecommunications company providing mobile voice and data services, broadband internet, and digital content to both individual consumers and businesses. It generates revenue primarily from mobile services (voice and data plans), fixed-line broadband, and equipment sales through its extensive retail network. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive nationwide infrastructure—including its 4G/5G network and fiber optic backbone—and its large subscriber base of over 50 million customers.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TIMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NFLX leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 1.7x TIMB's $26.6B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIMB's 16.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.6B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12.1B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.3B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.9B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.9% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.4% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.7% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, TIMB trades at a 52% valuation discount to NFLX's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TIMB offers better value at 0.85x vs NFLX's 0.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.1B | $350.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.6B | $355.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.73x | 32.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.86x | 26.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.85x | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.24x | 11.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.53x | 7.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.56x | 37.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $18 for TIMB. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIMB's 0.69x.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.0% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.9B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.5B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TIMB five years ago would be worth $28,314 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,346 for NFLX. Over the past 12 months, TIMB leads with a +109.1% total return vs NFLX's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIMB at 38.7% vs NFLX's 36.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.5% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.1% | -16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.7% | +156.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.1% | +53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.5% | +772.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TIMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TIMB currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.74 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.65 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.8 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 395K | 41.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TIMB as "Hold" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.8% upside for NFLX (target: $117) vs -12.8% for TIMB (target: $24). TIMB is the only dividend payer here at 7.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TIMBTIM S.A. | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.87 | $117.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $11.10 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +2.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIM S.A. (TIMB) | 100 | 126.48 | +26.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 102.53 | 222.65 | +117.2% |
TIM S.A. (TIMB) returned +183% over 5 years vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)'s +53%. A $10,000 investment in TIMB 5 years ago would be worth $28,314 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIM S.A. (TIMB) | $15.6B | $26.6B | +70.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
TIM S.A.'s revenue grew from $15.6B (2016) to $26.6B (2025) — a 6.1% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIM S.A. (TIMB) | 4.8% | 16.2% | +237.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
TIM S.A.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 16% (2025). Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIM S.A. (TIMB) | 7.3 | 2.2 | -69.9% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
TIM S.A. has traded in a 2x–7x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~33x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIM S.A. (TIMB) | 1.48 | 8.95 | +504.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
TIM S.A.'s EPS grew from $1.48 (2016) to $8.95 (2025) — a 22% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TIM S.A. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+93% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
TIMB vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIMB or NFLX a better buy right now?
TIM S.A. (TIMB) offers the better valuation at 15.7x trailing P/E (2.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIMB or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, TIM S.A. (TIMB) is the cheapest at 15.7x versus Netflix, Inc. at 32.7x. On forward P/E, TIM S.A. is actually cheaper at 2.9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TIM S.A. wins at 0.15x versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.80x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIMB or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, TIM S.A. (TIMB) delivered a total return of +183.1%, compared to +53.5% for Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). A $10,000 investment in TIMB five years ago would be worth approximately $28K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +772.4% versus TIMB's +308.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIMB or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TIM S.A. (TIMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.43β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.78β — meaning NFLX is approximately 79% more volatile than TIMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 69% for TIM S.A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TIMB or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24.3% net margin versus 16.2% for TIM S.A. — meaning it keeps 24.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus 25.0% for TIMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIMB leads at 53.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TIMB or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, TIM S.A. (TIMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.15x versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.80x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TIM S.A. (TIMB) trades at 2.9x forward P/E versus 26.4x for Netflix, Inc. — 23.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 41.8% to $117.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — TIMB or NFLX?
In this comparison, TIMB (7.9% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TIMB or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TIM S.A. (TIMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.43), 7.9% yield, +308.5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TIMB: +308.5%, NFLX: +772.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TIMB and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TIMB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. TIMB pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 3.1%