Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) vs Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKO | 68.9% revenue growth vs BATRA's 10.5% |
| Quality / Margins | TKO | 4.1% net margin vs BATRA's -3.2% |
| Stability / Safety | BATRA | Beta 0.48 vs TKO's 0.75 |
| Dividends | TKO | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; BATRA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TKO | +50.1% vs BATRA's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TKO | 1.3% ROA vs BATRA's -1.4%, ROIC 5.3% vs 1.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
TKO Group Holdings is a sports and entertainment company that operates major professional wrestling promotions including WWE and UFC. It generates revenue primarily from media rights deals and content distribution (~60%), live event ticket sales and merchandise (~25%), and sponsorships and advertising (~15%). The company's moat lies in its ownership of iconic, globally recognized wrestling and mixed martial arts brands with decades of fan loyalty and extensive content libraries.
Atlanta Braves Holdings is a professional sports franchise that owns and operates the Atlanta Braves Major League Baseball team and its surrounding real estate development. The company generates revenue primarily from baseball operations — including ticket sales, media rights, and sponsorships — and from The Battery Atlanta mixed-use development, which includes retail, dining, and entertainment venues. Its key competitive advantage is the unique combination of a historic MLB franchise with a successful real estate ecosystem that creates multiple revenue streams beyond traditional sports operations.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TKO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 6.5x BATRA's $732M. TKO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATRA's -3.2%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +61.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $732M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | -$23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | -$120M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -43.0% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | -16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -144.4% | -109.7% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TKO's 22.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BATRA's 35.1x.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26.0B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29.2B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 99.06x | -130.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 83.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.15x | 35.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.49x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.71x | 5.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TKO delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BATRA. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BATRA's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TKO scores 5/9 vs BATRA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.2B | $726M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $831M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $837M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.95x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $44,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,198 for BATRA. Over the past 12 months, TKO leads with a +50.1% total return vs BATRA's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TKO at 40.0% vs BATRA's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.1% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +174.1% | +41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +340.5% | +62.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1297.3% | +143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.0% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BATRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKO's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $226.92 | $50.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $133.07 | $38.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +95.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 72.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 717K | 53K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TKO as "Buy" and BATRA as "Buy". TKO is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TKOTKO Group Holding… | BATRAAtlanta Braves Ho… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $233.90 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 432.53 | +332.5% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | 100 | 168.3 | +68.3% |
TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) returned +341% over 5 years vs Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA)'s +62%. A $10,000 investment in TKO 5 years ago would be worth $44,052 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | $729M | $4.7B | +549.3% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | $262M | $732M | +179.6% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $729M (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 23.1% CAGR. Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $262M (2016) to $732M (2025) — a 12.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 4.6% | 11.3% | +142.5% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -23.7% | -3.2% | +86.5% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 11% (2025). Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -24% (2016) to -3% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 72.8 | 92.5 | +27.1% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 15x–93x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~99x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 0.44 | 2.26 | +413.6% |
| Atlanta Braves Hold… (BATRA) | -1.25 | -0.37 | +70.4% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $2.26 (2025) — a 20% CAGR. Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-1.25 (2016) to $-0.37 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+823% vs 2021). Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. generated $-120M FCF in 2025 (-544% vs 2021).
TKO vs BATRA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TKO or BATRA a better buy right now?
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 99.1x trailing P/E (37.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TKO or BATRA?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) delivered a total return of +340.5%, compared to +62.0% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA). A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1297% versus BATRA's +143.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TKO or BATRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. (BATRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.48β versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s 0.75β — meaning TKO is approximately 55% more volatile than BATRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 156% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — TKO or BATRA?
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.3% net margin versus -3.2% for Atlanta Braves Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 17.6% versus 2.3% for BATRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATRA leads at 19.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — TKO or BATRA?
In this comparison, TKO (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. BATRA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is TKO or BATRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.75), +1297% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1297%, BATRA: +143.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between TKO and BATRA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 30%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%