Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) vs Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TMUS | 8.5% revenue growth vs UZF's -95.7% |
| Value | UZF | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 20.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | UZF | 15.2% net margin vs TMUS's 12.4% |
| Stability / Safety | TMUS | Beta 0.20 vs UZF's 0.24 |
| Dividends | TMUS | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs UZF's 100.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | UZF | -7.6% vs TMUS's -15.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UZF | 5.9% ROA vs TMUS's 5.0%, ROIC -0.6% vs 8.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
T-Mobile US is a major wireless telecommunications carrier providing mobile voice, messaging, and data services to consumers and businesses. It generates revenue primarily from postpaid and prepaid service plans—roughly 80% of total revenue—with the remainder coming from device sales and equipment installment plans. The company's key competitive advantage is its extensive 5G network—the largest in the U.S.—which it built through strategic spectrum acquisitions and the Sprint merger.
United States Cellular is a regional wireless telecommunications carrier providing mobile voice, data, and internet services primarily in rural and suburban markets. It generates revenue through postpaid and prepaid service plans (~80% of revenue), equipment sales of smartphones and devices (~20%), and roaming agreements with other carriers. Its competitive advantage lies in its established spectrum holdings and network infrastructure in underserved markets where national carriers have less presence.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
UZF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). TMUS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TMUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 46.1x UZF's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.2% (UZF) to 12.4% (TMUS). On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88.3B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31.8B | $430M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11.0B | $290M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.5B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +137.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -93.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.6% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, UZF trades at a 74% valuation discount to TMUS's 22.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TMUS offers better value at 0.76x vs UZF's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $242.0B | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353.7B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.50x | 5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.92x | 15.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 6.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.18x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.40x | 0.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TMUS delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $11 for UZF. UZF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 1.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMUS scores 7/9 vs UZF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.6% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.0% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.98x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111.6B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.6B | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $117.2B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $18,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,995 for UZF. Over the past 12 months, UZF leads with a -7.6% total return vs TMUS's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TMUS at 16.1% vs UZF's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.7% | -7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.7% | +42.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | -0.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +502.6% | -0.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UZF's 0.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UZF currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs TMUS's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $276.49 | $22.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $181.36 | $16.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.1% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, UZF offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs TMUS's 1.67%.
| Metric | TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. | UZFArray Digital Inf… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $257.42 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.64 | $22.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +2.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 137.61 | +37.6% |
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 99.22 | 71.9 | -27.5% |
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) returned +88% over 5 years vs Array Digital Infra… (UZF)'s -0%. A $10,000 investment in TMUS 5 years ago would be worth $18,821 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | $37.5B | $88.3B | +135.6% |
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | $4.0B | $163M | -95.9% |
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s revenue grew from $37.5B (2016) to $88.3B (2025) — a 10.0% CAGR. Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's revenue grew from $4.0B (2016) to $163M (2025) — a -29.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 3.9% | 12.4% | +219.6% |
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 1.2% | 178.5% | +14739.7% |
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2016) to 12% (2025). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's net margin went from 1% (2016) to 179% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 12.2 | 20.9 | +71.3% |
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 14.8 | 5.3 | -64.2% |
T-Mobile US, Inc. has traded in a 12x–68x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x. Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 has traded in a 5x–41x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~6x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 1.69 | 9.72 | +475.1% |
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 0.56 | 3.33 | +494.6% |
T-Mobile US, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.69 (2016) to $9.72 (2025) — a 21% CAGR. Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's EPS grew from $0.56 (2016) to $3.33 (2025) — a 22% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
T-Mobile US, Inc. generated $10B FCF in 2025 (+233% vs 2021). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+312% vs 2021).
TMUS vs UZF: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMUS or UZF a better buy right now?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the better valuation at 5.8x trailing P/E (15.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMUS or UZF?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the cheapest at 5.8x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 22.5x. On forward P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 is actually cheaper at 15.4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: T-Mobile US, Inc. wins at 0.70x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's 3.13x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMUS or UZF?
Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) delivered a total return of +88.2%, compared to -0.1% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth approximately $19K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +502.6% versus UZF's -0.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMUS or UZF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.20β versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's 0.24β — meaning UZF is approximately 19% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 198% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TMUS or UZF?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the more profitable company, earning 178.5% net margin versus 12.4% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — meaning it keeps 178.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 20.7% versus -30.2% for UZF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TMUS leads at 43.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TMUS or UZF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.70x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's 3.13x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) trades at 15.4x forward P/E versus 20.9x for T-Mobile US, Inc. — 5.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — TMUS or UZF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the highest yield at 100.0%, versus 1.7% for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS).
08Is TMUS or UZF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.20), 1.7% yield, +502.6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +502.6%, UZF: -0.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TMUS and UZF?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; UZF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%