Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) vs StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | STUB | 29.5% revenue growth vs TRAK's 10.5% |
| Value | STUB | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 23.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | TRAK | 30.9% net margin vs STUB's -72.0% |
| Stability / Safety | TRAK | Beta 0.80 vs STUB's 2.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TRAK | 1.0% yield; STUB pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRAK | -55.3% vs STUB's -56.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TRAK | 12.9% ROA vs STUB's -23.5%, ROIC 21.4% vs 3.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
ReposiTrak is a software-as-a-service provider offering supply chain compliance and food safety solutions for the grocery and retail industries. It generates revenue primarily through SaaS subscriptions for its compliance tracking, supplier management, and B2B e-commerce platforms — with additional income from professional consulting services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on food safety regulatory compliance, creating a sticky ecosystem where both retailers and their suppliers must use its platform to meet stringent industry requirements.
StubHub operates a global online marketplace for secondary ticket sales to live events — primarily sports, concerts, and theater. It generates revenue primarily through transaction fees charged to both buyers and sellers on each ticket sale. Its key advantage is its massive scale and brand recognition as one of the world's largest secondary ticket platforms, creating network effects that attract both buyers and sellers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TRAK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). STUB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
STUB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 77.8x TRAK's $24M. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STUB's -72.0%.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $164M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.0% | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | -65.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | -72.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +9.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | -42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRAK's 17.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STUB's 27.1x.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $158M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $130M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.86x | -63.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.84x | 8.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.43x | 27.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.01x | 1.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.36x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.85x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-54 for STUB. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STUB's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs STUB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | -53.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.9% | -23.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +21.4% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.69x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $509,973 | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 165.50x | -7.50x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth $14,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,350 for STUB. Over the past 12 months, TRAK leads with a -55.3% total return vs STUB's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRAK at 13.4% vs STUB's -24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.5% | -33.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.3% | -56.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.8% | -56.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | -56.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.8% | -56.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | -24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STUB's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.72 | $27.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.11 | $8.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.7% | +34.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TRAK as "Buy" and STUB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 175.9% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 146.2% for STUB (target: $24). TRAK is the only dividend payer here at 0.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | STUBStubHub Holdings,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $23.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | $14M | $23M | +61.3% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | $212M | $1.8B | +736.7% |
ReposiTrak, Inc.'s revenue grew from $14M (2016) to $23M (2025) — a 5.5% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 4.8% | 30.9% | +548.9% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | -29.2% | -0.2% | +99.5% |
ReposiTrak, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 31% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 50.3 | 35.3 | -29.8% |
ReposiTrak, Inc. has traded in a 27x–76x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~25x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 0.03 | 0.35 | +905.7% |
| StubHub Holdings, I… (STUB) | -0.17 | -0.15 | +11.8% |
ReposiTrak, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.03 (2016) to $0.35 (2025) — a 29% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
ReposiTrak, Inc. generated $8M FCF in 2025 (+65% vs 2021). StubHub Holdings, Inc. generated $255M FCF in 2024 (+283% vs 2021).
TRAK vs STUB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRAK or STUB a better buy right now?
ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) offers the better valuation at 24.9x trailing P/E (23.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRAK or STUB?
On forward P/E, StubHub Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8.4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRAK or STUB?
Over the past 5 years, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) delivered a total return of +41.4%, compared to -56.5% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB). A $10,000 investment in TRAK five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRAK returned -1.8% versus STUB's -56.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRAK or STUB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.80β versus StubHub Holdings, Inc.'s 2.25β — meaning STUB is approximately 182% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 169% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TRAK or STUB?
ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30.9% net margin versus -0.2% for StubHub Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27.5% versus 7.8% for STUB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TRAK or STUB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) trades at 8.4x forward P/E versus 23.8x for ReposiTrak, Inc. — 15.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 175.9% to $24.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TRAK or STUB?
In this comparison, TRAK (1.0% yield) pays a dividend. STUB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TRAK or STUB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.80), 1.0% yield). StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) carries a higher beta of 2.25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: -1.8%, STUB: -56.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TRAK and STUB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. TRAK pays a dividend while STUB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.