Independent Power Producers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XIFR vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
XIFR vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Independent Power Producers | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $200.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.20B | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $960M | $2.81B |
XIFR vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPLR Infrastructure… (XIFR) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 134.5 | +34.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XIFR vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 56.9%, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta 1.17, yield 41.5%, current ratio 0.91x
- Lower P/E (22.6x vs 23.8x)
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth -2.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 276.1% 10Y total return vs XIFR's 68.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.0% revenue growth vs XIFR's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.6x vs 23.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs XIFR's -2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs XIFR's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 41.5% yield, vs NEE's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.2% vs XIFR's +33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs XIFR's -0.1%, ROIC 4.1% vs 0.3% |
XIFR vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XIFR vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 23.5x XIFR's $1.2B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XIFR's -2.3%. On growth, NEE holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $459M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$133M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.3% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.7% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, XIFR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NEE's 19.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $200.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $293.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -36.03x | 29.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.64x | 23.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.88x | 19.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 7.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-0 for XIFR. XIFR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.57x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEE's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEE scores 5/9 vs XIFR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.2% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.2B | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $960M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.2B | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.09x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $14,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,156 for XIFR. Over the past 12 months, NEE leads with a +49.2% total return vs XIFR's +33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 10.8% vs XIFR's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.3% | +49.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +35.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.1% | +276.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.8% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XIFR's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.99 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +97.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 764K | 8.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XIFR and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XIFR as "Hold" and NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for XIFR (target: $12) vs 1.9% for NEE (target: $98). For income investors, XIFR offers the higher dividend yield at 41.48% vs NEE's 2.33%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.80 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +41.5% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.48 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NEE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XIFR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XIFR vs NEE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XIFR or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR). NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the better valuation at 29. 3x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XIFR or NEE?
On forward P/E, XPLR Infrastructure, LP is actually cheaper at 22.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XIFR or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to +21. 6% for XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +276. 1% versus XIFR's +68. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XIFR or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus XPLR Infrastructure, LP's 1. 17β — meaning XIFR is approximately 464% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XIFR or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -3. 4% for XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NextEra Energy, Inc. grew EPS -2. 4% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for XPLR Infrastructure, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XIFR or NEE?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -2. 4% for XPLR Infrastructure, LP — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus 4. 9% for XIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XIFR or NEE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR) trades at 22.
6x forward P/E versus 23. 8x for NextEra Energy, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XIFR: 9. 2% to $11. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — XIFR or NEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
XPLR Infrastructure, LP (XIFR) offers the highest yield at 41. 5%, versus 2. 3% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE).
09Is XIFR or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 3% yield, +276. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +276. 1%, XIFR: +68. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XIFR and NEE?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XIFR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NEE is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.