Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) vs Token Cat Limited (TC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZG | 15.5% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7% |
| Quality / Margins | ZG | 0.9% net margin vs TC's -403.8% |
| Stability / Safety | TC | Beta 0.11 vs ZG's 1.11 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TC | -34.5% vs ZG's -39.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ZG | 0.4% ROA vs TC's -72.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Zillow Group is a digital real estate marketplace that connects home buyers, sellers, renters, and real estate professionals through its portfolio of brands including Zillow, Trulia, and StreetEasy. It generates revenue primarily through real estate agent advertising and lead generation services (~60% of revenue), home flipping operations through its Zillow Offers segment (~30%), and mortgage origination and title services. The company's key advantage is its massive network effect—with over 200 million monthly users, it has become the dominant online destination for real estate searches, creating a powerful data moat and brand recognition.
Token Cat operates an omni-channel automotive marketplace in China that connects car buyers with dealers through auto shows, group purchasing, and virtual dealership services. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees on vehicle sales — including commissions from dealers and fees from group-buying events — supplemented by advertising and data services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated online-to-offline platform that combines physical auto shows with digital tools, creating a comprehensive ecosystem that addresses both consumer discovery and dealer sales needs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ZG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ZG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 70.5x TC's $37M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.9% (ZG) to -4.0% (TC). On growth, ZG holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $37M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | -$193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.1% | +73.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | -2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | -38.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.5% | +58.6% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.8B | $621M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.1B | $627M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 497.78x | -1.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.17x | 86.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.33x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.84x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZG delivers a 0.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | -4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -72.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$675M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $768M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $48M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -60.86x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ZG five years ago would be worth $2,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for TC. Over the past 12 months, TC leads with a -34.5% total return vs ZG's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZG at 2.7% vs TC's -59.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.7% | +48.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.8% | -34.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -93.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.5% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | -59.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TC is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZG's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.22 | $22.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.90 | $6.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.7% | +50.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.1 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 896K | 21K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZG as "Buy" and TC as "Hold".
| Metric | ZGZillow Group, Inc… | TCToken Cat Limited |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $71.93 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.2% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | 100 | 113.05 | +13.1% |
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) returned -75% over 5 years vs Token Cat Limited (TC)'s -99%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | $847M | $2.6B | +205.1% |
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | $117M | $49M | -58.1% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's revenue grew from $847M (2016) to $2.6B (2025) — a 13.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | -26.0% | 0.9% | +103.4% |
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | -83.9% | -3.8% | +95.4% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's net margin went from -26% (2016) to 1% (2025).
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | -1.22 | 0.09 | +107.4% |
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | -158.48 | -64.8 | +59.1% |
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's EPS grew from $-1.22 (2016) to $0.09 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A generated $235M FCF in 2025 (+107% vs 2021). Token Cat Limited generated $-35M FCF in 2024 (+63% vs 2021).
ZG vs TC: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZG or TC a better buy right now?
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) offers the better valuation at 497.8x trailing P/E (20.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZG or TC?
Over the past 5 years, Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) delivered a total return of -74.5%, compared to -99.1% for Token Cat Limited (TC). A $10,000 investment in ZG five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZG returned +93.5% versus TC's -99.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZG or TC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Token Cat Limited (TC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.11β versus Zillow Group, Inc. Class A's 1.11β — meaning ZG is approximately 910% more volatile than TC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — ZG or TC?
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0.9% net margin versus -382.3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 0.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZG leads at -1.3% versus -182.9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZG leads at 74.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ZG or TC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is ZG or TC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Token Cat Limited (TC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.11)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TC: -99.9%, ZG: +93.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ZG and TC?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%