Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 9.4x · EV/EBITDA 4.9x · ROE 16.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $78.4B | $56.6B | $69.7B | $70.6B | $76.0B | $51.9B | $28.9B | $48.6B | $50.6B | $62.4B | $55.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $83.4B | $61.6B | $67.7B | $69.5B | $76.0B | $52.6B | $32.3B | $52.2B | $55.1B | $68.0B | $61.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 9.38 | 11.53 | 10.90 | 9.30 | 9.80 | 11.12 | — | 17.78 | 14.81 | 24.20 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.65 | 2.50 | 2.98 | 3.05 | 2.58 | 2.64 | 2.92 | 2.87 | 2.95 | 5.57 | 7.50 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.66 | 1.90 | 2.38 | 2.51 | 3.07 | 2.34 | 1.42 | 2.25 | 2.61 | 3.84 | 4.00 |
| P/FCF | 10.62 | 16.41 | 12.09 | 13.70 | 12.48 | 10.50 | 18.71 | 27.95 | 29.91 | 442.60 | — |
| P/OCF | 7.80 | 5.64 | 5.74 | 6.23 | 6.85 | 5.90 | 5.77 | 5.96 | 6.52 | 14.64 | 23.72 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.72 | 2.90 | 3.00 | 2.58 | 2.67 | 3.27 | 3.08 | 3.21 | 6.07 | 8.22 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.86 | 5.31 | 5.56 | 5.31 | 5.63 | 5.39 | 11.31 | 6.70 | 6.98 | 15.68 | 23.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.06 | 9.49 | 8.10 | 7.07 | 7.54 | 8.60 | — | 13.98 | 12.29 | 72.68 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.87 | 11.74 | 13.48 | 12.48 | 10.64 | 20.93 | 29.97 | 32.59 | 481.95 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 62.0% | 75.7% | 78.7% | 83.5% | 72.8% | 50.2% | 67.0% | 70.0% | 58.9% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 28.2% | 28.2% | 34.6% | 41.4% | 33.8% | 31.0% | -5.5% | 21.8% | 26.0% | 8.3% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 22.0% | 22.0% | 27.4% | 32.8% | 26.3% | 23.7% | -6.1% | 16.1% | 19.9% | 23.0% | -14.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.8% | 16.8% | 22.3% | 28.7% | 33.0% | 22.0% | -2.9% | 13.3% | 19.2% | 17.1% | -8.1% |
| ROA | 10.1% | 10.1% | 14.1% | 17.8% | 19.5% | 12.6% | -1.7% | 7.7% | 10.7% | 8.7% | -3.9% |
| ROIC | 15.4% | 15.4% | 22.3% | 27.8% | 31.4% | 19.6% | -1.7% | 11.3% | 14.7% | 3.4% | -4.8% |
| ROCE | 14.4% | 14.4% | 19.8% | 25.4% | 28.5% | 18.3% | -1.7% | 11.8% | 15.6% | 3.4% | -4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.50 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 2.36 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.47 | 2.66 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.17 | -0.07 | -0.04 | -0.00 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.43 | 0.43 | -0.17 | -0.09 | -0.00 | 0.07 | 1.20 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 1.28 | 2.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.45 | -0.35 | -0.22 | -0.00 | 0.14 | 2.22 | 2.02 | 2.68 | 39.36 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 29.51 | 29.51 | 60.55 | 66.47 | 56.31 | 34.33 | -2.60 | 20.16 | 18.31 | 3.41 | -4.53 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 | 2.10 | 2.44 | 1.90 | 2.12 | 1.69 | 1.18 | 1.36 | 1.20 | 1.75 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.91 | 2.13 | 1.71 | 1.98 | 1.51 | 1.00 | 1.13 | 1.03 | 1.58 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 1.08 | 1.29 | 0.96 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.31 | 0.79 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.49 | 8.49 | 5.77 | 3.88 | 4.61 | 9.15 | 7.83 | 7.29 | 6.00 | 9.51 | 13.15 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 43.20 | 41.37 | 42.76 | 35.53 | 43.33 | 57.11 | 46.39 | 49.79 | 55.73 | 60.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 3.8% | 3.0% | 4.8% | 6.8% | 5.2% | 2.8% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 43.4% | 43.4% | 32.6% | 44.6% | 66.3% | 57.5% | — | 21.5% | 12.8% | 15.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 10.7% | 8.7% | 9.2% | 10.7% | 10.2% | 9.0% | — | 5.6% | 6.8% | 4.1% | — |
| FCF Yield | 9.4% | 6.1% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 8.0% | 9.5% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 0.2% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | 1.5% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.0% | 8.3% | 7.6% | 6.3% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $539M | $569M | $584M | $587M | $584M | $579M | $581M | $580M | $579M | $553M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EOG stock.
EOG Resources, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 9.4x. The historical average is 25.8x. This places it at the 11th percentile of its historical range.
EOG Resources, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 4.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.2x.
EOG Resources, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.8%. The historical average is 15.9%.
Based on historical data, EOG Resources, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 9.4x. This is at the 11th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EOG Resources, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.72% with a payout ratio of 43.4%.
EOG Resources, Inc. has 62.0% gross margin and 28.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
EOG Resources, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commodity price cyclicality and revenue contraction
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discounted Multiples Price in Commodity Peak Risk
Based on EOG's reported figures, the 9.38x trailing P/E and 4.86x EV/EBITDA sit below Devon's 11.02x and Diamondback's 23.08x P/E, suggesting the market is pricing in cyclical normalization rather than the recent EPS surge persisting.
The 8.20x forward P/E relative to the 9.38x trailing multiple implies analysts expect earnings to hold or grow modestly, yet the 2.65x price-to-sales and 10.62x price-to-FCF indicate the market is paying little for each dollar of cash generated. This discount to peers may reflect investor skepticism about sustaining elevated realized pricing given the -3.5% year-over-year revenue decline, warranting monitoring of whether the valuation gap narrows as cash flows are tested through the next commodity cycle.
Leverage Rising From a Near-Debt-Free Base
According to reported filings, debt-to-equity climbed from 0.14 in 2024Q2 to 0.25 in 2026Q3 while interest coverage stayed well above 39x in recent quarters, leaving debt service comfortable despite the deliberate increase.
The move from a near-debt-free position toward a 0.25 debt-to-equity ratio suggests management is willing to use modest leverage to fund capital programs, though the level remains conservative relative to peers such as Diamondback at 0.35 and Devon at 0.57. Coverage ratios in the 18x to 54x range indicate minimal interest burden, but the D/EBITDA trend from 1.31x to 2.70x and back to 1.69x shows leverage relative to earnings has been cyclical and warrants continued monitoring.
Returns Recovering but Below Historical Peak
As reported in quarterly financial statements, ROIC has recovered from 4.3% in 2025Q3 to 7.6% in 2026Q3, yet remains well below the 12.6% reported by Devon and the 17.8% reported by APA, suggesting capital efficiency is still rebuilding.
The gap between EOG's 7.6% ROIC and the stronger returns posted by APA and Devon may indicate that EOG's large, continuously reinvested asset base dilutes returns during periods of softer pricing. The improvement in ROE from 2.3% to 8.6% over the same window appears driven more by margin recovery than by any structural change in asset productivity, so investors should track whether ROIC can sustain a durable move above 8%.
Working Capital Discipline Supports Cash Conversion
Based on EOG's reported figures, the cash conversion cycle has run negative across recent quarters, most recently at -5 days, suggesting the company collects receivables faster than it pays suppliers and benefits from supplier financing.
A consistently negative CCC implies EOG is effectively using supplier payables to fund operations, which supports liquidity without requiring incremental borrowing. However, the wide swings in DPO between 40 and 705 days across quarters likely reflect timing of large payables and classification effects rather than a stable operating pattern, so the reliability of the CCC as a signal of underlying efficiency is limited.
Gross Margin Metric Obscures Cost Structure
As reported in filings, gross margin swung between 41.9% and 97.7% across recent quarters, a range that likely reflects inconsistent cost-of-revenue classification in upstream accounting rather than a true measure of pricing power.
For an E&P company, gross margin is frequently misapplied because DD&A and lease operating expenses are classified differently across periods, making quarter-to-quarter comparisons unreliable. Operating margin combined with cash operating cost per boe provides a more meaningful read on operational efficiency, and analysts should avoid anchoring on the headline gross margin when judging EOG's earning power.