Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.1x · EV/EBITDA 5.9x · ROE 7.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $30.9B | $33.5B | $25.8B | $16.0B | $13.8B | $7.0B | $3.3B | $2.8B | $4.9B | $5.8B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise Value | $38.6B | $41.2B | $35.0B | $21.7B | $18.0B | $12.6B | $8.2B | $8.1B | $10.4B | $13.0B | $8.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.14 | 16.19 | 112.46 | 9.20 | 7.72 | — | — | — | — | 3.85 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.35 | 3.69 | 4.94 | 3.15 | 1.13 | 1.03 | 1.25 | 0.73 | 1.04 | 1.95 | 3.20 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.13 | 1.22 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.23 | 0.71 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.65 |
| P/FCF | 8.11 | 11.80 | 45.01 | 13.77 | 6.66 | 11.61 | 6.69 | 11.16 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 6.03 | 6.53 | 9.13 | 5.03 | 3.97 | 4.24 | 2.15 | 1.50 | 1.66 | 3.55 | 5.59 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.54 | 6.70 | 4.29 | 1.48 | 1.84 | 3.10 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 4.35 | 4.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.92 | 7.16 | 12.28 | 5.37 | 4.11 | 36.16 | 14.53 | 18.16 | — | 9.00 | 47.04 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.26 | 12.59 | 48.63 | 9.36 | 6.97 | — | — | — | — | 35.47 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.51 | 61.00 | 18.74 | 8.72 | 20.71 | 16.64 | 32.49 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 48.9% | 14.7% | 18.6% | 66.4% | 43.8% | 40.8% | 54.5% | 61.9% | 51.6% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 34.7% | 34.7% | 13.1% | 45.6% | 22.4% | -19.9% | -33.0% | -30.3% | -58.8% | 12.8% | -40.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 22.5% | 22.5% | 4.4% | 34.2% | 14.6% | -16.7% | -36.1% | -32.2% | -47.4% | 50.5% | -24.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 1.2% | 13.4% | 16.7% | -11.9% | -10.1% | -11.8% | -15.3% | 11.0% | -5.3% |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | 0.7% | 7.2% | 7.8% | -5.6% | -5.2% | -6.2% | -8.9% | 6.7% | -3.1% |
| ROIC | 6.9% | 6.9% | 1.9% | 9.6% | 13.2% | -6.9% | -4.5% | -5.5% | -9.9% | 1.6% | -5.4% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 2.3% | 11.0% | 14.9% | -8.0% | -5.2% | -6.4% | -11.9% | 1.8% | -5.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.36 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 1.36 | 3.29 | 1.44 | 1.30 | 16.22 | 8.73 | 11.94 | — | 5.07 | 19.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.34 | 1.34 | 3.22 | 1.42 | 0.97 | 15.89 | 8.69 | 11.93 | — | 4.97 | 12.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.71 | 15.99 | 4.97 | 2.06 | 9.11 | 9.95 | 21.33 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 7.46 | 7.46 | 1.58 | 10.58 | 10.35 | -4.42 | -3.84 | -6.99 | -12.44 | 2.18 | -5.82 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 1.30 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 2.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 0.69 | 1.30 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 2.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 1.73 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.54 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.75 | 4.78 | 31.18 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 59.77 | 85.97 | 65.88 | 48.35 | 76.74 | 77.78 | 87.31 | 105.84 | 82.95 | 67.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.5% | — | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 19.1% | 19.1% | 141.6% | 13.2% | 11.5% | — | — | — | — | 1.4% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.0% | 6.2% | 0.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% | — | — | — | — | 25.9% | — |
| FCF Yield | 12.3% | 8.5% | 2.2% | 7.3% | 15.0% | 8.6% | 15.0% | 9.0% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1.1% | 11.6% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $625M | $560M | $413M | $406M | $323M | $261M | $255M | $261M | $188M | $167M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EQT stock.
EQT Corporation's current P/E ratio is 11.1x. The historical average is 17.7x. This places it at the 54th percentile of its historical range.
EQT Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 5.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.3x.
EQT Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 7.9%. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, EQT Corporation is trading at a P/E of 11.1x. This is at the 54th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EQT Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.26% with a payout ratio of 19.1%.
EQT Corporation has 48.9% gross margin and 34.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
EQT Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.4x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commodity price and hedge-mark volatility distorting ratios
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Multiple Premium Hinges on Cycle Persistence
EQT trades at 17.0x trailing earnings and 7.46x EV/EBITDA, at a discount to Appalachian peers Antero (20.7x, 11.3x) and Range (20.6x, 11.8x), but at a meaningful premium to CNX (9.7x, 5.8x) per current market data, suggesting the market is pricing consolidation scale rather than commodity beta.
The forward P/E of 14.29 versus 17.0x trailing implies the market expects roughly 19% earnings growth, an assumption that looks optimistic given revenue contracted 2.9% in 2026Q3 after the price-led surge, and with management skipping guidance in the latest release. P/B of 1.28 sits below Range's 3.13 but above CNX's 1.43 comparably only loosely, since Appalachian reserve carrying values are heavily sensitive to the SEC 12-month trailing price deck. The 12.4x P/FCF multiple is arguably the more reliable anchor for a pure-play E&P, and it frames the valuation as reasonable only if FCF margins hold near the 24.6% level seen in 2026Q3.
Returns on Capital Swell With Price Cycle
ROIC has swung from -0.8% in 2024Q3 to 4.4% in 2026Q1 before settling at 1.0% in 2026Q3 per EQT's quarterly ratio data, a dispersion that reflects commodity price cycles rather than a stable compounding of returns on the Appalachian asset base.
The 2026Q1 peak of 4.4% ROIC coincided with a 60.3% operating margin quarter driven by favorable gas pricing, while the 2026Q3 normalization to 1.0% suggests the elevated returns were price-driven rather than structural. Even the best readings trail peers like Range (11.2% ROIC) and Coterra (10.9%) reported in the peer table, implying EQT's scale advantage in acreage has not yet translated into superior accounting returns on capital. Investors should monitor whether midstream vertical integration after the Equitrans re-acquisition structurally lifts ROIC by converting third-party gathering fees into owned cash flows, or simply adds capital base without proportionate earnings.
Payables Swings Cloud Working Capital Picture
Days payable outstanding has whipsawed from 90 days through most of 2024-2025 to 2,428 days in 2026Q1 and 1,547 days in 2026Q3, while DSO held steady near 41-46 days, per EQT's reported working capital ratios, an extreme payables signal that warrants reconciliation.
A payables cycle of this magnitude alongside a current ratio stuck below 1.0 (0.71 in 2026Q3) suggests the balance sheet is being sustained by extending supplier and midstream partner payment timing rather than by building a conventional liquidity buffer, with cash on hand down to $78.7M. Because inventory days are unavailable in the reported data, the cash conversion cycle cannot be fully computed, so the usual working capital efficiency read is incomplete. Analysts should treat the DPO swing as a possible artifact of acquisition-related payables settlement timing rather than an operating improvement, and monitor whether it normalizes toward the 90-day historical baseline.
Debt Cut Two-Thirds Restores Coverage Comfort
EQT's debt-to-equity ratio has compressed from 0.67 in 2024Q3 to 0.18 in 2026Q3 alongside interest coverage recovery from -1.54x to 6.37x, as total debt declined roughly $8.6B from its $13.8B peak per EQT's quarterly filings, positioning leverage below Appalachian peers.
This deleveraging materially reduces refinancing risk and places EQT at the low end of the peer group versus Antero at 0.67 and Range at 0.32, giving the company genuine dry powder for consolidation or shareholder returns. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 4.75x in 2026Q3 remains above the 2.13x seen in the strong 2026Q1 quarter, a reminder that leverage comfort in E&P names is itself a function of where the trailing EBITDA base sits in the price cycle rather than of debt reduction alone. Interest coverage at 6.37x is comfortable but well below the 21.5x print in 2026Q1, so covenant headroom should be stress-tested against a lower gas price deck rather than current spot conditions.
Gross Margin Misleads on E&P Economics
The single most misapplied ratio for EQT is gross margin, which printed 96.1% in 2026Q3 and -23.2% in 2024Q2 per its income statement, a 119-point swing driven almost entirely by cost-of-goods accounting noise rather than underlying wellhead economics.
For a natural gas producer whose realized price is set at commodity markets, cost of goods sold often nets against derivative settlements, making reported gross margin meaningless as a measure of unit profitability; investors should instead anchor on operating cash flow per Mcfe and unhedged breakeven costs. The more commonly applied trap, however, is the trailing P/E of 17.0x, which is distorted by mark-to-market hedge adjustments and non-operating items that drove EPS from -$0.54 in 2024Q3 to $2.49 in 2026Q1, a range far wider than operating results justify. The appropriate substitute is EV/EBITDA normalized across a full price cycle, currently 7.46x, or better yet P/FCF at 12.4x, which strips out the derivative noise that makes headline earnings and gross margin both unreliable for this business model.