Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.4x · EV/EBITDA 6.7x · ROE 4.0%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.2B | $43.5B | $35.0B | $27.9B | $24.1B | $19.1B | $7.6B | $15.2B | $9.7B | $12.3B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $67.0B | $58.2B | $47.3B | $34.1B | $30.4B | $25.2B | $13.5B | $20.6B | $14.0B | $13.7B | $7.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.40 | 26.24 | 10.55 | 8.94 | 5.56 | 8.77 | — | 63.60 | 11.50 | 25.56 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.48 | 2.89 | 3.17 | 3.35 | 2.52 | 2.84 | 2.72 | 3.84 | 4.47 | 10.23 | 14.39 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.25 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.44 | 0.78 | 1.02 | 0.69 | 2.21 | 1.89 |
| P/FCF | 9.98 | 8.30 | — | 23.15 | 8.90 | 11.45 | 103.32 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.96 | 4.96 | 5.46 | 4.72 | 3.82 | 4.85 | 3.61 | 5.55 | 6.22 | 13.87 | 22.85 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.88 | 4.29 | 4.09 | 3.17 | 3.74 | 4.79 | 5.19 | 6.45 | 11.39 | 13.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.73 | 5.85 | 6.52 | 5.40 | 3.87 | 4.79 | — | 9.58 | 8.59 | 14.73 | 64.36 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.62 | 27.49 | 9.87 | 7.72 | 5.16 | 8.15 | — | 38.76 | 11.78 | 25.51 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.12 | — | 28.30 | 11.20 | 15.12 | 182.05 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 35.2% | 45.1% | 57.5% | 70.1% | 63.3% | 22.6% | 40.2% | 51.3% | 54.3% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.7% | 32.7% | 39.9% | 54.8% | 68.0% | 59.3% | -194.7% | 17.5% | 46.5% | 50.2% | -13.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 30.3% | 37.7% | 45.8% | 32.3% | -160.6% | 6.1% | 38.9% | 40.0% | -31.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.0% | 4.0% | 11.7% | 19.0% | 30.3% | 18.9% | -36.6% | 1.7% | 8.6% | 10.0% | -5.4% |
| ROA | 2.4% | 2.4% | 6.9% | 11.4% | 17.9% | 10.8% | -22.0% | 1.1% | 5.8% | 7.3% | -4.1% |
| ROIC | 6.7% | 6.7% | 8.7% | 15.0% | 23.7% | 17.2% | -22.9% | 2.7% | 6.0% | 8.7% | -1.7% |
| ROCE | 7.6% | 7.6% | 9.8% | 17.8% | 28.3% | 21.1% | -28.3% | 3.2% | 7.3% | 9.8% | -1.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.72 | 1.08 | 0.81 | 1.28 | — | 2.55 | 2.77 | 1.62 | 10.24 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.25 | -0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.48 | 1.48 | 1.69 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 1.16 | — | 2.50 | 2.64 | 1.49 | -5.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.82 | — | 5.16 | 2.29 | 3.66 | 78.73 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 8.68 | 8.68 | 16.46 | 25.27 | 36.77 | 15.48 | -27.77 | 3.07 | 13.56 | 13.12 | -3.05 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 1.01 | 0.49 | 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.62 | 8.56 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 8.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 7.96 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 113.29 | 113.29 | 52.16 | 56.21 | 42.76 | 39.95 | 65.94 | 64.08 | 28.19 | 60.50 | 154.57 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.67 | 52.48 | 37.07 | 38.38 | 36.30 | 56.70 | 58.38 | 72.11 | 70.16 | 83.18 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.2% | 2.7% | 4.5% | 5.2% | 6.5% | 1.6% | 3.1% | 0.7% | 0.4% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 69.5% | 69.5% | 47.3% | 45.9% | 35.8% | 14.3% | — | 46.7% | 4.4% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 3.8% | 9.5% | 11.2% | 18.0% | 11.4% | — | 1.6% | 8.7% | 3.9% | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.0% | 12.0% | — | 4.3% | 11.2% | 8.7% | 1.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.8% | 4.6% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 5.2% | 2.7% | 1.8% | 3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.0% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 4.4% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $289M | $214M | $180M | $177M | $177M | $158M | $164M | $105M | $98M | $75M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FANG stock.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 32.4x. The historical average is 21.8x. This places it at the 80th percentile of its historical range.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.8x.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.0%. The historical average is 2.9%.
Based on historical data, Diamondback Energy, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 32.4x. This is at the 80th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.15% with a payout ratio of 69.5%.
Diamondback Energy, Inc. has 35.2% gross margin and 32.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Net margin compression risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Strength
According to the latest quarterly data, FANG's operating margin surged to 45.2% in Q2 2026, but net margin lagged at 33.8%, suggesting significant non-operating charges that warrant monitoring.
The wide gap between operating and net margins in Q2 2026, as reported in the financial statements, indicates that interest, taxes, or one-time items are consuming a substantial portion of operating profits. This pattern, combined with the volatile gross margin range of 24.3% to 68.7% over the past ten quarters, suggests that commodity price swings and acquisition-related costs heavily influence reported profitability. Investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of core earning power, while monitoring the sustainability of the net margin gap.
ROIC Recovery on Permian Scale
Based on the quarterly data, FANG's ROIC improved to 3.3% in Q2 2026 from 0.2% in Q1 2026, reflecting a sharp rebound after the Endeavor acquisition, though still below the 3.7% peak in Q2 2024.
The sequential jump in ROIC suggests that the integration of Endeavor assets is beginning to generate returns, but the absolute level remains modest relative to the company's historical performance. The low ROIC relative to peers like Matador (10.5%) and Coterra (10.9%) may indicate that the acquisition has temporarily depressed capital efficiency, as the asset base expanded faster than earnings. Over the next several quarters, investors should monitor whether ROIC can recover to pre-acquisition levels as production scales and integration costs subside.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
As reported in the quarterly data, FANG's cash conversion cycle turned negative to -1 day in Q2 2026, down from 37 days in Q2 2025, indicating improved working capital management and supplier leverage.
The dramatic improvement in CCC, driven by a DPO of 36 days versus DSO of 33 days, suggests that FANG is effectively using supplier credit to fund its operations, a sign of negotiating power. However, the DPO has been volatile, swinging from 6 days in Q2 2025 to 80 days in Q1 2026, which may reflect timing of payments rather than a structural shift. Asset turnover remains low at 0.08, typical for the capital-intensive E&P sector, but the negative CCC indicates that working capital is not a drag on cash flow.
Leverage Moderate Despite Acquisition
According to the latest balance sheet data, FANG's debt-to-equity ratio stands at 0.29, with interest coverage of 48x in Q2 2026, indicating a comfortable debt service position despite the Endeavor acquisition.
The reported D/E of 0.29 is below the peer average and suggests that management has maintained a conservative capital structure even after a major acquisition. Interest coverage of 48x in Q2 2026, as per the quarterly data, implies that operating income is more than sufficient to cover interest expenses, providing a cushion against commodity price downturns. However, the D/EBITDA of 3.33 is higher than the 10-quarter average, indicating that leverage has increased, and investors should monitor whether this trend continues as integration costs are absorbed.
Liquidity Tightens Despite Cash Build
Based on the balance sheet data, FANG's current ratio fell to 0.47 in Q2 2026, down from 0.56 in Q1 2026, indicating a strained short-term liquidity position despite a rise in cash to $462 million.
The current ratio below 1.0 suggests that current liabilities exceed current assets, which is common in the E&P industry due to large accounts payable and accrued liabilities. However, the decline from 3.66 in Q2 2024 to 0.47 in Q2 2026 indicates a significant tightening, likely due to increased debt and acquisition-related payables. While the company's robust operating cash flow and access to credit markets mitigate immediate liquidity risk, the trend warrants monitoring, especially if commodity prices weaken.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 35.05 is misleading for FANG because it reflects depressed trailing earnings; the forward P/E of 10.14 better captures normalized earnings power, as per the valuation data.
Analysts often use trailing P/E to value E&P companies, but this can be distorted by cyclical commodity prices and one-time charges. For FANG, the trailing P/E is inflated by the Q4 2025 net loss, while the forward P/E of 10.14 aligns with the company's expected earnings recovery. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 7.16 (or 5.96 forward) is more stable and comparable across the sector, as it is less affected by depreciation and financing choices. Investors should focus on forward multiples and EV/EBITDA to assess valuation, rather than trailing P/E.