VCP Scanner
Stock Screener
Filter stocks with fundamental & technical criteria
Technical Scanner
RSI, Moving averages & volume momentum signals
Market Themes
Curated industry baskets & thematic leaders
Earnings Hub
Calendar, EPS surprise stats & earnings transcripts
Market News
Real-time market intelligence & AI overviews
Insider Buying
SEC Form 4 corporate insider purchases
Minervini — VCPContraction bases in Stage 2 uptrends
Minervini — Trend TemplateFull 8-rule Stage 2 screen
O'Neil — Cup with HandleBase breakouts with RS leadership
O'Neil — CANSLIM LeadersGrowth leaders with RS ≥ 85
Qullamaggie — High Tight FlagsPower plays after a large advance
Qullamaggie — Momentum Leaders1/3/6-month strength leaders
Livermore — Pivotal PointsMulti-touch resistance breakouts
View All Playbooks...
Breakouts
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Index & ETFs
SPY vs QQQVTI vs VOOSPY vs IWM
Compare Any Stocks...
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
VisualizeInteractive multi-year financial charts
Watchlist
Breakouts
WatchlistPricing
Ctrl K
Pricing
MNST
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Analyze deeply. Research with clarity.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • Pricing
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly market insights — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTermsRefund Policy
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerBreakoutsCompareWatchlist
MNSTMonster Beverage Corporation
$43.91$85.9B
Overview & Tools
OverviewChart Terminal ↗Visualize
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice History
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Discovery & Screens
Live BreakoutsStock ScreenerOwnership
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. MNST
  4. Financial Ratios

Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 45.3x · EV/EBITDA 33.1x · ROE 26.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

MNST Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Market Cap$85.9B$75.5B$106.5B$121.9B$108.3B$102.9B$98.9B$69.5B$55.5B$73.1B$53.2B
Enterprise Value$83.8B$73.4B$105.3B$119.6B$107.0B$101.6B$97.7B$68.7B$54.9B$72.5B$52.8B
P/E Ratio →45.2739.5370.5574.8290.6474.4570.0662.9355.9389.1573.90
P/S Ratio10.369.1014.2117.0717.1518.5721.5116.5414.5921.6917.44
P/B Ratio10.479.1517.8814.8115.4115.6719.1716.6615.3818.7615.97
P/FCF43.6938.4063.9882.20160.2693.6876.2769.2551.1081.6789.25
P/OCF40.9335.9855.2270.97121.9689.0272.5162.3947.8173.9775.84

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

MNST EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
EV / Revenue—8.8514.0616.7516.9518.3321.2516.3514.4221.5317.32
EV / EBITDA33.0728.9752.3959.1464.9854.9757.8346.9340.9658.1446.90
EV / EBIT34.6429.4952.2257.8268.0456.3859.8548.9642.7860.5148.66
EV / FCF—37.3463.2980.65158.3392.4775.3668.4650.5281.0888.61

MNST Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Gross Margin55.8%55.8%54.0%53.1%50.3%56.1%59.2%60.0%60.3%63.5%63.7%
Operating Margin29.2%29.2%25.8%27.4%25.1%32.4%35.5%33.4%33.7%35.6%35.6%
Net Profit Margin23.0%23.0%20.1%22.8%18.9%24.9%30.7%26.4%26.1%24.4%23.4%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
ROE26.8%26.8%21.3%21.4%17.5%23.5%30.2%28.5%26.5%22.7%17.5%
ROA21.5%21.5%17.3%18.1%14.8%19.7%24.8%22.9%21.3%18.4%14.7%
ROIC33.1%33.1%27.0%25.2%21.7%29.2%33.3%33.2%30.4%28.5%29.1%
ROCE31.9%31.9%25.5%24.7%22.4%29.2%32.9%33.3%31.5%30.3%24.5%

MNST Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Debt / Equity——0.06————————
Debt / EBITDA——0.19————————
Net Debt / Equity—-0.25-0.19-0.28-0.19-0.20-0.23-0.19-0.18-0.14-0.11
Net Debt / EBITDA-0.82-0.82-0.58-1.14-0.79-0.72-0.70-0.55-0.48-0.42-0.34
Debt / FCF—-1.06-0.70-1.55-1.93-1.21-0.91-0.80-0.59-0.59-0.63
Interest Coverage377.14377.1472.31————————

Net cash position: cash ($2.1B) exceeds total debt ($0)

MNST Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Current Ratio3.703.703.324.814.764.854.193.503.003.723.04
Quick Ratio3.153.152.653.973.824.243.742.962.543.272.70
Cash Ratio1.911.911.402.802.663.192.752.011.592.141.27
Asset Turnover—0.830.970.740.760.710.740.820.840.700.73
Inventory Turnover4.584.584.673.443.354.105.634.665.444.816.84
Days Sales Outstanding—71.2059.5161.0458.7759.0652.8646.9546.4648.7068.59

MNST Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017FY 2016
Earnings Yield2.2%2.5%1.4%1.3%1.1%1.3%1.4%1.6%1.8%1.1%1.4%
FCF Yield2.3%2.6%1.6%1.2%0.6%1.1%1.3%1.4%2.0%1.2%1.1%
Buyback Yield0.1%0.1%3.5%0.5%0.7%0.0%0.6%1.0%2.4%0.5%4.2%
Total Shareholder Yield0.1%0.1%3.5%0.5%0.7%0.0%0.6%1.0%2.4%0.5%4.2%
Shares Outstanding—$2.0B$2.0B$2.1B$2.1B$2.1B$2.1B$2.2B$2.3B$2.3B$2.4B

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeAccelerating
ProfitabilityStable
Balance SheetFortress
Cash FlowRobust
Top Statement Risk

Celsius share gains and margin pressure

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2026Q2)

Premium Multiple Reflects Maturation

MNST trades at 48.3x trailing earnings and 35.3x EV/EBITDA, per recent filings, a premium to mature peers but a discount to hyper-growth Celsius, suggesting the market prices a maturing compounder.

The forward P/E of 20.3x implies a sharp earnings acceleration that may not fully materialize if margin expansion stalls. The PEG of 6.0x, based on reported figures, indicates the market is paying a high price for growth relative to near-term EPS gains, which appears inconsistent with the decelerating ROIC trend. Investors should monitor whether the multiple compresses as growth normalizes.

Margin Stability Amid Cost Pressures

Gross margin held at 55.9% in Q2 2026, up from 53.2% in Q4 2024, per financial statements, while operating margin expanded to 29.2%, indicating cost management offsetting inflationary pressures.

The stability in gross margin suggests that pricing power and mix shifts are offsetting aluminum and freight costs, but the sequential dip in operating margin from 31.0% in Q1 2026 to 29.2% in Q2 2026 hints at rising SG&A, possibly from marketing investments to counter Celsius. Net margin of 23.0% remains robust, yet the in-line EPS despite 20.2% revenue growth suggests limited operating leverage in the near term.

ROIC Volatility Signals Efficiency Ceiling

ROIC fluctuated between 5.9% and 9.5% over the past ten quarters, per reported data, with Q2 2026 at 8.0%, indicating a capital-light model but no clear compounding trend.

The lack of a sustained upward trend in ROIC, despite revenue acceleration, suggests that incremental capital is being deployed into acquisitions and working capital rather than high-return organic projects. The recent acquisition of Bang Energy assets may temporarily depress returns as integration costs are absorbed. Investors should watch whether ROIC can exceed its prior peak of 9.5% as the company scales internationally.

Working Capital Drag Eases but Persists

Cash conversion cycle improved to 74 days in Q2 2026 from 104 days in Q4 2024, per financial statements, driven by faster inventory turnover and extended payables, yet remains elevated versus beverage peers.

The reduction in DIO from 100 to 69 days and the extension of DPO from 57 to 63 days, based on reported figures, indicate better inventory management and supplier leverage. However, DSO of 68 days remains high, suggesting that distributor financing is a structural feature of the model. The improvement in CCC is positive but may not be sustainable if growth requires higher inventory buffers.

Debt-Free Balance Sheet Enhances Flexibility

Monster eliminated its total debt by Q2 2026, down from $748.8M in Q3 2024, per recent filings, with interest coverage exceeding 1,250x, indicating minimal refinancing risk and ample capacity for capital returns.

The transition to a zero-leverage position, as reported, provides significant strategic flexibility, allowing the company to fund acquisitions or buybacks without external financing. The absence of debt also insulates the company from rising rate environments, a key advantage over levered peers. However, the lack of debt may also signal a conservative capital structure that could be optimized to enhance shareholder returns.

Ample Liquidity Buffers Against Shocks

Current ratio improved to 3.73 in Q2 2026 from 3.32 in Q4 2024, per financial statements, with cash at $2.2B, indicating a fortress liquidity position that can withstand severe demand or cost shocks.

The quick ratio of 3.22, excluding inventory, remains robust, suggesting that even a sharp inventory write-down would not impair liquidity. The high cash balance, as reported, provides a cushion for potential legal settlements or competitive responses. This liquidity strength supports the company's ability to weather category disruptions, though it may also indicate under-leveraging of the balance sheet.

Premium Valuation vs. Staple Peers

MNST's P/E of 48.3x and EV/EBITDA of 35.3x, per recent filings, exceed National Beverage's 16.0x and 10.5x, but trail Celsius's 116.4x, reflecting a middle-ground growth and profitability profile.

Monster's ROE of 6.5% in Q2 2026 is below National Beverage's 32.2%, but its net margin of 23.0% is superior to Celsius's 4.3%, indicating a more mature and profitable business model. The valuation gap to Celsius suggests the market is pricing Monster's growth as more sustainable but less explosive. Investors should monitor whether Monster can defend its premium as Celsius scales.

Misapplied Metric: P/E on GAAP Earnings

The most misapplied ratio for Monster is the trailing P/E, which fails to account for the non-recurring nature of acquisition-related costs and the economic dilution from stock-based compensation, per reported figures.

Trailing P/E of 48.3x overstates the cost of the business because it includes one-time charges from the Bang acquisition and ignores the recurring SBC expense that reduces economic earnings. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA, which normalizes for capital structure and non-operating items. Based on reported data, EV/EBITDA of 35.3x still appears rich, but it better reflects the underlying cash-generative model.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily

Consensus & Technical Research Suite
Open MNST Terminal

MNST Chart Terminal

WASM

Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.

Launch Terminal

Live Breakouts Feed

LIVE

High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.

Explore Setups

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

MNST — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MNST stock.

What is Monster Beverage Corporation's P/E ratio?

Monster Beverage Corporation's current P/E ratio is 45.3x. The historical average is 39.8x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.

What is Monster Beverage Corporation's EV/EBITDA?

Monster Beverage Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 33.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 26.4x.

What is Monster Beverage Corporation's ROE?

Monster Beverage Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 26.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 28.5%.

Is MNST stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Monster Beverage Corporation is trading at a P/E of 45.3x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Monster Beverage Corporation's profit margins?

Monster Beverage Corporation has 55.8% gross margin and 29.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.