Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -76.7x · EV/EBITDA 14.6x · ROE -0.9%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $279M | $260M | $253M | $263M | $261M | $225M | $132M | $150M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $669M | $650M | $561M | $541M | $526M | $490M | $240M | $140M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -76.73 | — | 119.93 | 89.00 | 8.79 | 22.52 | 136.27 | 42.29 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.61 | 4.30 | 4.85 | 5.76 | 5.78 | 7.48 | 6.86 | 11.35 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.93 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | 9.89 | — | — | 13.10 | 14.06 | 18.07 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 10.83 | 10.10 | 9.89 | 10.29 | 10.59 | 13.10 | 14.06 | 18.07 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.73 | 10.74 | 11.86 | 11.64 | 16.26 | 12.48 | 10.56 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.58 | 14.16 | 14.17 | 13.91 | 7.84 | 15.75 | 19.30 | 15.64 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 36.17 | 48.55 | 41.44 | 42.54 | 12.26 | 33.09 | 103.45 | 38.54 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 21.91 | — | — | 28.47 | 25.58 | 16.81 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -10.9% | -10.9% | 77.0% | 84.9% | 79.5% | 77.2% | 88.0% | 84.6% | 86.2% | 82.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 30.5% | 26.8% | 28.8% | 96.2% | 50.3% | 13.6% | 27.4% | 34.3% | 36.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.4% | -4.4% | 4.0% | 6.4% | 65.8% | 33.1% | 5.1% | 27.1% | 34.3% | 33.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -0.9% | -0.9% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 11.4% | 5.3% | 0.6% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 2.3% |
| ROA | -0.4% | -0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 5.5% | 2.6% | 0.5% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 2.2% |
| ROIC | 2.2% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 6.2% | 3.0% | 1.0% | 2.0% | 2.4% | — |
| ROCE | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.3% | 8.1% | 4.0% | 1.2% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.12 | 1.02 | 0.93 | 1.20 | 0.74 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.59 | 8.59 | 7.81 | 7.25 | 4.08 | 8.78 | 8.84 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.29 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 0.90 | 1.16 | 0.73 | -0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.49 | 8.49 | 7.77 | 7.15 | 3.95 | 8.50 | 8.69 | -1.17 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 12.02 | — | — | 15.37 | 11.52 | -1.26 | 0.30 | 0.33 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 1.59 | 87.97 | — | 10.83 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 14.87 | 10.31 | 3.71 | 2.80 | 1.13 | 8.36 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 14.87 | 10.44 | 3.71 | 2.80 | 1.13 | 8.36 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.23 | 2.24 | 2.23 | 2.10 | 0.74 | 7.91 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 5.5% | 0.3% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 812.5% | 525.1% | 44.6% | 107.1% | 731.3% | 12.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 0.8% | 1.1% | 11.4% | 4.4% | 0.7% | 2.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 10.1% | — | — | 7.6% | 7.1% | 5.5% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 3.2% | 3.4% | 0.3% | 5.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 9.9% | 10.2% | 6.9% | 11.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | 9.2% | 0.3% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $15M | $16M | $14M | $11M | $9M | $8M | $9M | $9M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PINE stock.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -76.7x. The historical average is 69.8x.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.4x.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -0.9%. The historical average is 2.9%.
Based on historical data, Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -76.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 6.76%.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. has -10.9% gross margin and 30.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
External management fee structure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Multiples Reflect External Management
Based on reported figures, PINE's P/FFO multiple of 21.16x in 2026Q1 sits at a persistent discount to larger, internally managed peers, suggesting that the market continues to apply a structural valuation penalty due to the company's external management agreement and associated governance concerns.
The valuation gap relative to internally managed peers like Agree Realty suggests that investors are pricing in the potential for fee leakage and limited operational control. While the current multiple appears attractive on a standalone basis, it warrants further investigation into whether the discount is justified by the quality of the underlying retail portfolio or if it represents a mispricing of the external manager's strategic value.
NOI Margin Volatility Hinders Performance
As reported in financial statements, PINE's NOI margin has exhibited extreme instability, swinging from a negative 2.6% in 2025Q4 to 87.5% in 2026Q1, which indicates that property-level profitability is highly sensitive to non-recurring charges and potential accounting distortions within the net lease model.
The erratic nature of these margins suggests that the company's core property operations may be less predictable than the triple-net lease structure implies. Investors should monitor whether these fluctuations are driven by one-time asset impairments or if they reflect a deeper, structural inability to maintain consistent property-level margins across the portfolio.
FFO Payout Ratio Signals Inconsistency
According to recent SEC filings, the FFO payout ratio has fluctuated significantly, ranging from 13.6% in 2026Q1 to 86.5% in 2025Q2, highlighting that the dividend's sustainability is tied to volatile earnings rather than a stable, recurring cash flow base.
The wide variance in payout ratios suggests that the dividend policy may be subject to the timing of property dispositions and acquisitions rather than consistent operational performance. This volatility may indicate that the dividend is not as secure as the low payout ratio in certain quarters might suggest, necessitating a focus on AFFO-based coverage.
Leverage Profile Remains Highly Vulnerable
Based on the company's reported figures, interest coverage ratios have remained consistently low, dipping to 0.64x in 2025Q3, which indicates that the REIT's ability to service its debt obligations is under significant pressure in the current high-interest-rate environment.
The low interest coverage ratio suggests that the company's debt service burden is consuming a disproportionate share of operating cash flow, leaving little room for error. This vulnerability is compounded by the reliance on external financing to fund growth, which may limit the company's financial flexibility if market conditions for debt refinancing tighten further.
Misapplied P/E Distorts REIT Reality
As indicated by the company's financial data, the use of a standard P/E ratio is fundamentally misleading for PINE, as it fails to account for the massive non-cash depreciation charges inherent in real estate ownership that artificially depress GAAP earnings.
Investors should instead prioritize P/FFO or P/AFFO, which adjust for these non-cash items to provide a more accurate reflection of the REIT's true cash-generating capacity. Relying on P/E obscures the company's actual operational performance and may lead to an incorrect assessment of the stock's valuation relative to its peers.