Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 296.7x · EV/EBITDA 21.6x · ROE 0.9%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.7B | $23.9B | $23.4B | $47.3B | $32.4B | $45.2B | $34.1B | $24.3B | $12.6B | $19.8B | $10.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $47.0B | $23.2B | $24.3B | $47.3B | $32.1B | $44.7B | $34.0B | $24.0B | $12.3B | $19.7B | $9.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 296.72 | 144.11 | 15.04 | 11.24 | 7.50 | 22.63 | 30.93 | 23.61 | 7.75 | 24.54 | 59.74 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.03 | 2.02 | 1.77 | 2.74 | 2.01 | 3.54 | 3.34 | 2.54 | 1.31 | 2.37 | 1.44 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.71 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 2.81 | 2.54 | 4.87 | 4.01 | 3.42 | 1.97 | 3.62 | 2.19 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 32.51 | 20.72 | 40.21 | 46.45 | 37.64 | 21.73 | 52.63 | 23.28 |
| P/OCF | 22.15 | 11.13 | 7.90 | 7.90 | 6.24 | 14.76 | 16.31 | 13.02 | 6.85 | 11.80 | 9.64 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.96 | 1.83 | 2.74 | 1.99 | 3.50 | 3.32 | 2.51 | 1.27 | 2.36 | 1.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.56 | 10.67 | 7.08 | 7.66 | 5.68 | 12.90 | 15.12 | 11.67 | 5.73 | 11.41 | 10.22 |
| EV / EBIT | 144.96 | 57.92 | 12.39 | 9.81 | 7.14 | 18.78 | 25.70 | 20.24 | 8.52 | 19.63 | 41.00 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 32.48 | 20.50 | 39.78 | 46.19 | 37.15 | 21.11 | 52.48 | 22.87 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 33.9% | 39.3% | 47.9% | 47.3% | 41.7% | 37.1% | 38.7% | 36.9% | 36.3% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 2.7% | 12.6% | 26.7% | 27.5% | 19.0% | 12.9% | 12.6% | 14.0% | 12.9% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.4% | 1.4% | 11.7% | 24.4% | 24.6% | 15.7% | 10.8% | 10.8% | 16.9% | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 0.9% | 0.9% | 9.0% | 28.4% | 35.9% | 22.5% | 14.2% | 15.2% | 27.4% | 4.3% | 2.6% |
| ROA | 0.7% | 0.7% | 6.3% | 19.0% | 22.3% | 13.3% | 8.4% | 9.1% | 15.9% | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| ROIC | 1.3% | 1.3% | 7.1% | 23.7% | 31.4% | 21.2% | 13.1% | 14.0% | 17.7% | 16.5% | 4.5% |
| ROCE | 1.5% | 1.5% | 8.0% | 25.0% | 30.9% | 20.2% | 12.5% | 13.0% | 16.5% | 15.3% | 4.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 1.25 | 1.11 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 1.50 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.04 | 0.05 | -0.00 | -0.03 | -0.05 | -0.02 | -0.04 | -0.06 | -0.01 | -0.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.32 | -0.32 | 0.26 | -0.01 | -0.06 | -0.14 | -0.08 | -0.15 | -0.17 | -0.03 | -0.18 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.03 | -0.22 | -0.43 | -0.26 | -0.49 | -0.61 | -0.15 | -0.41 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.30 | 7.30 | 23.09 | 87.60 | 346.08 | 56.64 | 24.46 | 21.96 | 26.72 | 19.33 | 6.03 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.8B) exceeds total debt ($2.1B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.36 | 3.36 | 3.11 | 3.17 | 2.56 | 2.66 | 2.49 | 3.03 | 2.77 | 2.52 | 2.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.43 | 2.43 | 2.37 | 2.44 | 1.89 | 1.99 | 1.89 | 2.21 | 2.03 | 1.86 | 2.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 1.22 | 1.32 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 1.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.88 | 3.34 | 3.29 | 3.76 | 3.49 | 3.47 | 3.89 | 3.98 | 4.03 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 53.81 | 67.04 | 56.17 | 44.58 | 50.31 | 52.33 | 52.71 | 48.23 | 50.24 | 49.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 2.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 192.8% | 192.8% | 18.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% | 10.3% | 15.2% | 20.7% | 13.3% | 98.2% | 207.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.3% | 0.7% | 6.6% | 8.9% | 13.3% | 4.4% | 3.2% | 4.2% | 12.9% | 4.1% | 1.7% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 3.1% | 4.8% | 2.5% | 2.2% | 2.7% | 4.6% | 1.9% | 4.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2.8% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 2.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $923M | $939M | $944M | $912M | $924M | $920M | $904M | $911M | $906M | $886M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STM stock.
STMicroelectronics N.V.'s current P/E ratio is 296.7x. The historical average is 40.5x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
STMicroelectronics N.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 21.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.6x.
STMicroelectronics N.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is 0.9%. The historical average is 8.3%.
Based on historical data, STMicroelectronics N.V. is trading at a P/E of 296.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
STMicroelectronics N.V.'s current dividend yield is 0.65% with a payout ratio of 192.8%.
STMicroelectronics N.V. has 33.9% gross margin and 2.7% operating margin.
STMicroelectronics N.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent margin compression and demand weakness
Margin Compression Persists Amid Cyclical Trough
Gross margin fell from 41.7% in 2024Q1 to 34.8% in 2026Q2, a 690bps decline, reflecting underutilization and mix shift, with peers like TXN maintaining 57%.
The 690bps gross margin erosion since early 2024 underscores the severity of the cyclical downturn and the company's high fixed-cost IDM model. Operating margin swung from 15.9% in 2024Q1 to -1.5% in 2025Q1, then recovered to 6.3% in 2026Q2, but remains far below the 11-16% range seen in 2024. This suggests that while revenue is rebounding, the cost structure has not scaled down proportionally, and the margin recovery is lagging the top-line improvement. Investors should monitor whether gross margin can reclaim the 37-40% range as utilization improves, or if structural mix shifts toward lower-margin discrete components will cap profitability.
Return on Capital Stuck Near Zero
ROIC has been below 1% for five consecutive quarters, with 2026Q2 at 0.9%, compared to 2.4% in 2024Q1, indicating a severe cyclical trough in capital efficiency.
ROIC of 0.9% in 2026Q2 is barely above the cost of capital, suggesting that the company is currently destroying value on an economic basis. The decline from 2.4% in 2024Q1 to near-zero levels reflects both margin compression and a growing capital base, as total assets expanded to $27.0B. The heavy investment in SiC and 300mm capacity has not yet translated into returns, and the payback period may extend if demand recovery remains sluggish. This metric is critical for assessing whether management's capital allocation is ultimately value-accretive, and the current data suggests a prolonged period of subpar returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens on Inventory Build
Cash conversion cycle expanded from 89 days in 2024Q1 to 114 days in 2026Q2, driven by DIO rising from 121 to 127 days, indicating slower inventory turnover.
The 25-day lengthening of the cash conversion cycle is a red flag, as it suggests that inventory is accumulating relative to sales, potentially signaling weak demand or deliberate stockpiling ahead of expected recovery. DSO has also crept up from 46 to 51 days, while DPO has declined from 79 to 64 days, meaning STM is paying suppliers faster while collecting from customers slower. This combination strains working capital and contributed to negative free cash flow in 2026Q2. If inventory levels do not normalize, the company may face write-downs, particularly in the consumer electronics segment, which could further pressure margins.
Low Leverage Provides Cushion, But Debt Creeps Higher
Debt-to-equity rose from 0.19 in 2024Q1 to 0.22 in 2026Q2, while interest coverage remains comfortable at 18x, per balance sheet data.
Despite the cyclical downturn, STM's balance sheet remains conservative, with a D/E ratio of 0.22 that is far below peers like TXN at 0.95. Total debt increased by $0.7B over the period, but the low absolute level and strong interest coverage of 18x suggest no near-term solvency risk. However, the rising debt trend, combined with heavy capex requirements, warrants monitoring; if the downturn persists, the company may need to increase borrowing to fund its fab expansion plans. The current leverage is a strategic advantage, providing flexibility to weather the cycle, but investors should watch for any signs of covenant pressure or a shift toward more aggressive debt-funded growth.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Adequate
Current ratio improved to 2.78 in 2026Q2 from 2.27 in 2024Q2, with cash at $3.1B, providing a cushion against near-term obligations, based on reported figures.
The current ratio of 2.78 and quick ratio of 2.08 indicate that STM has ample short-term assets to cover its liabilities, even if inventory becomes difficult to liquidate. Cash and equivalents of $3.1B, combined with low debt, suggest the company can fund operations and capex without immediate financing stress. However, the negative free cash flow in 2026Q2 and the persistent working capital drag imply that the liquidity position could deteriorate if the downturn extends. The company's ability to maintain this buffer while investing heavily in SiC and 300mm capacity is a positive, but investors should monitor whether cash generation improves as the cycle recovers.
P/E Misleading in Cyclical Trough
The trailing P/E of 280.9 is distorted by trough earnings, while forward P/E of 37.35 better reflects normalized earnings, but EV/EBITDA of 20.4 still appears rich.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for STM is the trailing P/E, which is artificially inflated by the cyclical trough in earnings. With net margin at 1.4%, the trailing P/E of 280.9 is meaningless for valuation purposes. Investors should instead focus on forward P/E (37.35) or EV/EBITDA (20.4), which, while still elevated, provide a more realistic view of normalized earnings power. However, even these multiples suggest the market is pricing in a strong recovery, and if the margin recovery stalls, the stock could be vulnerable. A more appropriate metric may be EV/EBITDA on mid-cycle earnings, which would smooth out cyclicality and provide a better comparison to peers like NXPI at 15.7.