Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs AMAT's 4.4% |
| Value | TSM | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 33.9x), PEG 0.03 vs 1.97 |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% net margin vs AMAT's 24.7% |
| Stability / Safety | TSM | Beta 1.44 vs NVDA's 1.73 |
| Dividends | TSM | 0.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMAT | +136.7% vs NVDA's +41.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs AMAT's 19.3%, ROIC 81.8% vs 33.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Applied Materials is the world's leading supplier of semiconductor manufacturing equipment and services. It generates about 70% of revenue from selling semiconductor fabrication systems — with the remaining 30% from services and display equipment — through its three main segments: Semiconductor Systems, Applied Global Services, and Display. Its competitive moat stems from its comprehensive portfolio across the entire chipmaking process and deep customer relationships with major foundries like TSMC, Intel, and Samsung.
NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is the world's largest dedicated semiconductor foundry, manufacturing advanced chips for technology companies that design but don't produce their own silicon. It generates revenue primarily from wafer fabrication services — with high-performance computing and smartphone chips driving over 80% of sales — supplemented by packaging, testing, and mask-making services. Its competitive moat stems from unmatched manufacturing scale, technological leadership in advanced process nodes, and deep customer relationships that create switching costs for chip designers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 3 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TSM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 134.6x AMAT's $28.4B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMAT's 24.7%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28.4B | $215.9B | $3.82T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.4B | $133.2B | $2.79T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.0B | $120.1B | $1.72T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5.7B | $96.7B | $1.02T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.7% | +71.1% | +59.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.2% | +60.4% | +50.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +55.6% | +45.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +44.8% | +26.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +73.2% | +21.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +97.8% | +42.0% |
Valuation Metrics
At 35.1x trailing earnings, TSM trades at a 18% valuation discount to AMAT's 43.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.38x vs AMAT's 2.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $295.2B | $4.31T | $1.94T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $294.5B | $4.31T | $1.89T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.99x | 36.16x | 35.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.87x | 21.88x | 0.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.50x | 0.38x | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.07x | 32.33x | 22.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.41x | 19.94x | 15.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.74x | 27.52x | 11.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 51.81x | 44.54x | 55.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $32 for TSM. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMAT's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSM scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.3% | +76.3% | +31.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.3% | +58.1% | +21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.3% | +81.8% | +42.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +30.6% | +97.2% | +33.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.07x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$686M | $807M | -$1.77T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.2B | $10.6B | $2.76T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.6B | $11.4B | $990.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 35.46x | 545.03x | 315.91x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $29,677 for TSM. Over the past 12 months, AMAT leads with a +136.7% total return vs NVDA's +41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs AMAT's 48.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.6% | -6.2% | +17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.7% | +41.9% | +108.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +224.6% | +663.5% | +336.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.0% | +1181.2% | +196.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1926.2% | +22525.7% | +1552.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.1% | +96.9% | +63.5% |
Risk & Volatility
TSM is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSM currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NVDA's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 1.73x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $395.95 | $212.19 | $390.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $123.74 | $86.62 | $134.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +83.5% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 47.4 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.3M | 136.2M | 11.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMAT as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", TSM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for NVDA (target: $271) vs 8.9% for TSM (target: $408). For income investors, TSM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs AMAT's 0.46%.
| Metric | AMATApplied Materials… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $420.83 | $271.00 | $408.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 53 | 79 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | $0.04 | $90.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 100 | 545.88 | +445.9% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2,686.11 | +2586.1% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 100 | 609.79 | +509.8% |
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)'s +197%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | $14.7B | $28.4B | +93.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | $6.9B | $215.9B | +3025.0% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | $977.4B | $3.8T | +293.7% |
NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 23.9% | 24.7% | +3.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 24.1% | 55.6% | +130.6% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 35.3% | 45.1% | +27.8% |
NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 16.1 | 29.7 | +84.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 75.6 | 36.2 | -52.1% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 0.6 | 0.9 | +50.0% |
Applied Materials, Inc. has traded in a 11x–30x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x. NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Applied Materials, … (AMAT) | 3.17 | 8.66 | +173.2% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 0.06 | 4.9 | +7556.3% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 66.5 | 334.65 | +403.2% |
NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Applied Materials, Inc. generated $6B FCF in 2025 (+19% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).
AMAT vs NVDA vs TSM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMAT or NVDA or TSM a better buy right now?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 35.1x trailing P/E (0.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMAT or NVDA or TSM?
On trailing P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the cheapest at 35.1x versus Applied Materials, Inc. at 43.0x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0.8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0.03x versus Applied Materials, Inc.'s 1.97x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMAT or NVDA or TSM?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to +196.8% for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus TSM's +1552%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMAT or NVDA or TSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.44β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1.73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 19% more volatile than TSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 32% for Applied Materials, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — AMAT or NVDA or TSM?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus 24.7% for Applied Materials, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus 29.2% for AMAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMAT or NVDA or TSM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.03x versus Applied Materials, Inc.'s 1.97x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0.8x forward P/E versus 33.9x for Applied Materials, Inc. — 33.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 52.9% to $271.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMAT or NVDA or TSM?
In this comparison, TSM (0.8% yield), AMAT (0.5% yield) pay a dividend. NVDA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AMAT or NVDA or TSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.8% yield, +1552% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSM: +1552%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMAT and NVDA and TSM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. TSM pays a dividend while AMAT, NVDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.