Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) vs Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | META | 22.2% revenue growth vs AREN's -12.3% |
| Value | AREN | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 21.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | AREN | 88.5% net margin vs META's 30.1% |
| Stability / Safety | AREN | Beta 0.87 vs META's 1.42 |
| Dividends | META | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; AREN pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AREN | +79.5% vs META's -2.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AREN | 104.2% ROA vs META's 16.5%, ROIC 22.6% vs 27.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
The Arena Group Holdings operates a digital media platform that publishes and distributes content across sports, lifestyle, and news verticals. It generates revenue primarily through digital advertising — including display, video, and native ads — supplemented by subscription fees and content licensing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its proprietary publishing platform that enables efficient content creation and distribution across multiple brands and channels.
Meta Platforms operates a family of social media and messaging apps — Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger — that connect billions of users globally. It generates nearly all its revenue from digital advertising across these platforms, with its Reality Labs segment — which includes VR hardware and software — currently operating at a loss. The company's massive network effects and user data advantage create a powerful moat, making it difficult for competitors to challenge its dominant position in social media.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
META leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). AREN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
META is the larger business by revenue, generating $201.0B annually — 1407.2x AREN's $143M. AREN is the more profitable business, keeping 88.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to META's 30.1%. On growth, META holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $143M | $201.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $101.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $126M | $60.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $46.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.6% | +82.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +88.5% | +30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.3% | +23.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | +10.6% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, META's 2.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AREN's 14.6x.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137M | $222.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $257M | $270.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.01x | 27.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.52x | 21.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.62x | 2.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), META scores 5/9 vs AREN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +27.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +104.2% | +16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.6% | +27.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $119M | $48.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $124M | $83.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.70x | 61.69x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in META five years ago would be worth $24,623 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,642 for AREN. Over the past 12 months, AREN leads with a +79.5% total return vs META's -2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors META at 55.1% vs AREN's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.8% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.5% | -2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.2% | +272.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.6% | +146.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | +510.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | +55.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AREN is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. META currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs AREN's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.05 | $796.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.34 | $479.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.3 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 13.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AREN as "Buy" and META as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.0% upside for AREN (target: $10) vs 31.6% for META (target: $853). META is the only dividend payer here at 0.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ARENThe Arena Group H… | METAMeta Platforms, I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $853.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | 100 | 21.89 | -78.1% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 359.61 | +259.6% |
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) returned +146% over 5 years vs The Arena Group Hol… (AREN)'s -84%. A $10,000 investment in META 5 years ago would be worth $24,623 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | $0.00 | $126M | — |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | $27.6B | $201.0B | +627.1% |
Meta Platforms, Inc.'s revenue grew from $27.6B (2016) to $201.0B (2025) — a 24.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -81.6% | -80.0% | +2.0% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 36.9% | 30.1% | -18.4% |
Meta Platforms, Inc.'s net margin went from 37% (2016) to 30% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 32.7 | 28.1 | -14.1% |
Meta Platforms, Inc. has traded in a 14x–33x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~28x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Arena Group Hol… (AREN) | -5.08 | -2.85 | +43.9% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 3.49 | 23.49 | +573.1% |
Meta Platforms, Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.49 (2016) to $23.49 (2025) — a 24% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. generated $-21M FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021). Meta Platforms, Inc. generated $46B FCF in 2025 (+18% vs 2021).
AREN vs META: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AREN or META a better buy right now?
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) offers the better valuation at 27.6x trailing P/E (21.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AREN or META?
On forward P/E, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 3.5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AREN or META?
Over the past 5 years, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) delivered a total return of +146.2%, compared to -83.6% for The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN). A $10,000 investment in META five years ago would be worth approximately $25K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: META returned +510.1% versus AREN's -17.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AREN or META?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.87β versus Meta Platforms, Inc.'s 1.42β — meaning META is approximately 63% more volatile than AREN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — AREN or META?
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) is the more profitable company, earning 30.1% net margin versus -80.0% for The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41.4% versus 6.2% for AREN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AREN or META more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) trades at 3.5x forward P/E versus 21.8x for Meta Platforms, Inc. — 18.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AREN: 246.0% to $10.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AREN or META?
In this comparison, META (0.3% yield) pays a dividend. AREN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AREN or META better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. (AREN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.87)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AREN: -17.9%, META: +510.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AREN and META?
These companies operate in different sectors (AREN (Communication Services) and META (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.