Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PINE | 15.9% revenue growth vs KIM's 14.2% |
| Value | KIM | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 49.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | KIM | 27.3% net margin vs PINE's -5.3% |
| Stability / Safety | PINE | Beta 0.25 vs KIM's 0.70 |
| Dividends | KIM | 4.3% yield, vs PINE's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PINE | +25.8% vs KIM's +11.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KIM | 3.0% ROA vs PINE's -0.4%, ROIC 2.7% vs 2.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Alpine Income Property Trust is a real estate investment trust that acquires and operates single-tenant commercial properties leased to creditworthy tenants under long-term net lease agreements. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from its portfolio of retail and commercial properties — with over 90% of its properties occupied by national or regional tenants. The company's moat lies in its focus on essential-service retail properties with long-term leases to recession-resistant tenants, providing stable cash flows.
Kimco Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use properties across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through collecting rent from retail tenants—with grocery stores serving as anchor tenants that drive consistent foot traffic—and earns additional income from property management and development services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strategic focus on grocery-anchored centers in high-density metropolitan markets, which provides recession-resistant cash flow due to the essential nature of grocery retail.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
KIM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). PINE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 35.4x PINE's $61M. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 27.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -5.3%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $61M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $41M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $584M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $630M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.1% | +69.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | +29.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.5% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +190.4% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PINE's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 19.4x.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $292M | $16.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $23.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -89.64x | 42.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 49.80x | 30.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.08x | 19.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.32x | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KIM delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PINE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KIM scores 5/9 vs PINE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.0% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $689M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.04x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth $15,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,697 for PINE. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +25.8% total return vs KIM's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KIM at 8.8% vs PINE's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.5% | +17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.8% | +11.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.5% | +28.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.0% | +51.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.1% | +23.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PINE is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIM's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KIM currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs PINE's 94.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $23.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.10 | $17.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 76.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 136K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PINE as "Buy" and KIM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.0% upside for PINE (target: $21) vs 2.5% for KIM (target: $24). For income investors, KIM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | PINEAlpine Income Pro… | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $24.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 97.68 | -2.3% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 116.89 | +16.9% |
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) returned +51% over 5 years vs Alpine Income Prope… (PINE)'s +37%. A $10,000 investment in KIM 5 years ago would be worth $15,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | $8M | $61M | +616.0% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | $1.2B | $2.0B | +74.0% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 33.3% | -5.3% | -115.9% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 32.4% | 20.2% | -37.7% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 42.3 | 119.9 | +183.5% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 20.9 | 42.6 | +103.8% |
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. has traded in a 9x–136x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~-90x. Kimco Realty Corporation has traded in a 7x–132x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 0.31 | -0.22 | -171.0% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 0.79 | 0.55 | -30.4% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. generated $26M FCF in 2025 (+50% vs 2021). Kimco Realty Corporation generated $681M FCF in 2024 (+10% vs 2021).
PINE vs KIM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINE or KIM a better buy right now?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 42.8x trailing P/E (30.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINE or KIM?
On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINE or KIM?
Over the past 5 years, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) delivered a total return of +51.2%, compared to +37.0% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINE returned +37.1% versus KIM's +23.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINE or KIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.25β versus Kimco Realty Corporation's 0.70β — meaning KIM is approximately 182% more volatile than PINE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — PINE or KIM?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.2% net margin versus -5.3% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KIM leads at 30.9% versus 21.7% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINE leads at 86.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PINE or KIM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.4x forward P/E versus 49.8x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 19.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PINE: 4.0% to $20.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — PINE or KIM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the highest yield at 4.3%, versus 0.2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
08Is PINE or KIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.70), 4.3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KIM: +23.3%, PINE: +37.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PINE and KIM?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: PINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KIM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. KIM pays a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.