Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TBCH | 44.4% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value | TBCH | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs TBCH's 5.3% |
| Stability / Safety | AAPL | Beta 1.28 vs TBCH's 1.89 |
| Dividends | AAPL | 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; TBCH pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAPL | +9.7% vs TBCH's -26.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs TBCH's 6.6%, ROIC 64.5% vs 10.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Turtle Beach Corporation is a leading gaming audio technology company that designs and sells premium gaming headsets and accessories. It generates revenue primarily from headset sales—including console, PC, and mobile gaming headsets—with additional income from keyboards, mice, and simulation accessories under its Turtle Beach and ROCCAT brands. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strong brand recognition among gamers, deep expertise in audio engineering for gaming, and established retail distribution channels.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TBCH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 1254.6x TBCH's $347M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBCH's 5.3%. On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $347M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.7% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, TBCH trades at a 55% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TBCH's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $242M | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $334M | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.08x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.66x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.64x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.65x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.17x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 285.90x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $17 for TBCH. TBCH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs TBCH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.87x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $92M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,913 for TBCH. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +9.7% total return vs TBCH's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs TBCH's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.6% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.8% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.9% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.4% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.7% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBCH's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs TBCH's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.78 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 201K | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TBCH as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.5% upside for TBCH (target: $20) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TBCHTurtle Beach Corp… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.5% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH) | 100 | 186.08 | +86.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 395.1 | +295.1% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH)'s -61%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH) | $360M | $373M | +3.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH) | 10.8% | 4.3% | -59.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH) | 9.1 | 22.2 | +144.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Turtle Beach Corporation has traded in a 9x–23x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turtle Beach Corpor… (TBCH) | 2.37 | 0.78 | -67.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Turtle Beach Corporation generated $1M FCF in 2024 (+114% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
TBCH vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBCH or AAPL a better buy right now?
Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) offers the better valuation at 16.1x trailing P/E (10.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBCH or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) is the cheapest at 16.1x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, Turtle Beach Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBCH or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to -60.9% for Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus TBCH's +210.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBCH or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus Turtle Beach Corporation's 1.89β — meaning TBCH is approximately 47% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TBCH or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 4.3% for Turtle Beach Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 5.4% for TBCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TBCH or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) trades at 10.7x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 20.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TBCH: 59.5% to $20.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — TBCH or AAPL?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. TBCH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TBCH or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28), +1027% 10Y return). Turtle Beach Corporation (TBCH) carries a higher beta of 1.89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1027%, TBCH: +210.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TBCH and AAPL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TBCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.