Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare XPeng Inc. (XPEV) vs General Motors Company (GM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XPEV | 33.2% revenue growth vs GM's -1.3% |
| Value | GM | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 23.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | GM | 1.8% net margin vs XPEV's -7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | GM | Beta 0.89 vs XPEV's 0.92 |
| Dividends | GM | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; XPEV pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GM | +61.4% vs XPEV's -18.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GM | 1.2% ROA vs XPEV's -4.6%, ROIC 1.3% vs -16.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
XPeng is a Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer focused on smart, connected cars with advanced driver-assistance systems. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — with additional income from services like maintenance, charging, and software subscriptions — though the exact segment breakdown isn't publicly detailed. The company's key advantage lies in its vertically integrated software and hardware development, particularly its proprietary XPILOT autonomous driving technology and intelligent cockpit systems.
General Motors is a global automotive manufacturer that designs, builds, and sells vehicles under brands like Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — with North America contributing about 80% of automotive revenue — supplemented by financing operations through GM Financial and connected services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale and manufacturing efficiency, established dealer network, and growing investments in electric vehicles and autonomous driving technology through its Cruise subsidiary.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GM is the larger business by revenue, generating $185.0B annually — 3.1x XPEV's $60.3B. GM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPEV's -7.1%. On growth, XPEV holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60.3B | $185.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.3B | $17.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.3B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $11.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +6.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +125.3% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.5% | -135.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.1B | $71.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $180.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.84x | 24.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.07x | 6.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GM delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-14 for XPEV. XPEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GM's 2.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs XPEV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.1% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.9% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.7% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | $109.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18.6B | $20.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.9B | $130.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.31x | 3.79x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth $15,284 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,946 for XPEV. Over the past 12 months, GM leads with a +61.4% total return vs XPEV's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GM at 27.4% vs XPEV's 25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.0% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.9% | +106.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +52.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +194.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.3% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPEV's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GM currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs XPEV's 62.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.24 | $87.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.13 | $41.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 6.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XPEV as "Buy" and GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.2% upside for XPEV (target: $26) vs 14.3% for GM (target: $90). GM is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | XPEVXPeng Inc. | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $89.93 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | 100 | 77.71 | -22.3% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 282.88 | +182.9% |
General Motors Comp… (GM) returned +53% over 5 years vs XPeng Inc. (XPEV)'s -51%. A $10,000 investment in GM 5 years ago would be worth $15,284 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | $10M | $40.9B | +420941.7% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | $166.4B | $185.0B | +11.2% |
General Motors Company's revenue grew from $166.4B (2016) to $185.0B (2025) — a 1.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | -144.1% | -14.2% | +90.2% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 5.7% | 1.5% | -74.3% |
General Motors Company's net margin went from 6% (2016) to 1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 24.9 | +315.0% |
General Motors Company has traded in a 5x–25x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~24x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | -3.12 | -12.24 | -292.3% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 3.27 | -45.5% |
General Motors Company's EPS grew from $6.00 (2016) to $3.27 (2025) — a -7% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
XPeng Inc. generated $-4B FCF in 2024 (+18% vs 2021). General Motors Company generated $11B FCF in 2025 (+260% vs 2021).
XPEV vs GM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPEV or GM a better buy right now?
General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24.1x trailing P/E (6.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPeng Inc. (XPEV) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPEV or GM?
On forward P/E, General Motors Company is actually cheaper at 6.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPEV or GM?
Over the past 5 years, General Motors Company (GM) delivered a total return of +52.8%, compared to -50.5% for XPeng Inc. (XPEV). A $10,000 investment in GM five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +194.7% versus XPEV's -17.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPEV or GM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.89β versus XPeng Inc.'s 0.92β — meaning XPEV is approximately 4% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, XPeng Inc. (XPEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 2% for General Motors Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — XPEV or GM?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.5% net margin versus -14.2% for XPeng Inc. — meaning it keeps 1.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1.6% versus -16.3% for XPEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XPEV leads at 14.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XPEV or GM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, General Motors Company (GM) trades at 6.4x forward P/E versus 23.1x for XPeng Inc. — 16.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XPEV: 45.2% to $25.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — XPEV or GM?
In this comparison, GM (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. XPEV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is XPEV or GM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.89), 0.9% yield, +194.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +194.7%, XPEV: -17.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XPEV and GM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. GM pays a dividend while XPEV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.