Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HZO | -5.0% revenue growth vs AAP's -5.4% |
| Value | AAP | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 40.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAP | 0.5% net margin vs HZO's -1.4% |
| Stability / Safety | AAP | Beta 1.01 vs HZO's 1.68 |
| Dividends | AAP | 1.9% yield; HZO pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAP | +46.8% vs HZO's +20.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAP | 0.4% ROA vs HZO's -1.3%, ROIC 2.9% vs 3.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Advance Auto Parts is a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts and accessories for both professional installers and do-it-yourself customers. It generates revenue primarily through retail store sales — with professional/commercial sales representing about 60% of revenue and DIY retail making up the remaining 40% — supplemented by e-commerce. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive physical store network — over 4,700 locations across North America — which provides convenient access and local market penetration that pure online competitors cannot match.
MarineMax is the largest recreational boat and yacht retailer in the United States, operating dealerships that sell new and used boats while providing related services. The company generates revenue primarily from boat sales—both new and used—which account for roughly 80% of sales, supplemented by parts/accessories, service/repair, and brokerage/charter services. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive dealership network—the largest in the industry—which provides geographic reach, brand partnerships, and service capabilities that smaller regional players cannot match.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
HZO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AAP leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 3.7x HZO's $2.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.5% (AAP) to -1.4% (HZO).
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.6B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $44M | -$32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$298M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.4% | -123.4% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HZO's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAP's 12.2x.
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $667M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.84x | -21.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.56x | 40.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | 11.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAP delivers a 2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-3 for HZO. HZO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAP's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HZO scores 5/9 vs AAP's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.0% | -3.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.38x | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.2B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 1.09x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth $6,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,099 for AAP. Over the past 12 months, AAP leads with a +46.8% total return vs HZO's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at -3.2% vs AAP's -26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.8% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -9.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.0% | -37.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | +71.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.6% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs AAP's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.00 | $31.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.89 | $16.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +96.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 334K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AAP as "Hold" and HZO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.1% upside for AAP (target: $56) vs 1.6% for HZO (target: $31). AAP is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | HZOMarineMax, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.40 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 100 | 36.63 | -63.4% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 182.93 | +82.9% |
MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) returned -37% over 5 years vs Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP)'s -59%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | $9.6B | $8.6B | -10.1% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | $942M | $2.3B | +145.1% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s revenue grew from $9.6B (2016) to $8.6B (2025) — a -1.2% CAGR. MarineMax, Inc.'s revenue grew from $942M (2016) to $2.3B (2025) — a 10.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 4.8% | 0.5% | -89.4% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 2.4% | -1.4% | -157.1% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 1% (2025). MarineMax, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to -1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 15.5 | 53.8 | +247.1% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 19.9 | 17.5 | -12.1% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. has traded in a 16x–122x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~73x. MarineMax, Inc. has traded in a 4x–20x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~-21x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 6.2 | 0.73 | -88.2% |
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 0.91 | -1.43 | -257.1% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc.'s EPS grew from $6.20 (2016) to $0.73 (2025) — a -21% CAGR. MarineMax, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.91 (2016) to $-1.43 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. generated $-298M FCF in 2025 (-136% vs 2021). MarineMax, Inc. generated $12M FCF in 2025 (-97% vs 2021).
AAP vs HZO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AAP or HZO a better buy right now?
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) offers the better valuation at 72.8x trailing P/E (19.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AAP or HZO?
On forward P/E, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AAP or HZO?
Over the past 5 years, MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) delivered a total return of -37.4%, compared to -59.0% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP). A $10,000 investment in HZO five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HZO returned +71.9% versus AAP's -53.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AAP or HZO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.01β versus MarineMax, Inc.'s 1.68β — meaning HZO is approximately 65% more volatile than AAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 2% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — AAP or HZO?
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) is the more profitable company, earning 0.5% net margin versus -1.4% for MarineMax, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HZO leads at 4.5% versus 1.9% for AAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAP leads at 43.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AAP or HZO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) trades at 19.6x forward P/E versus 40.1x for MarineMax, Inc. — 20.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAP: 6.1% to $56.40.
07Which pays a better dividend — AAP or HZO?
In this comparison, AAP (1.9% yield) pays a dividend. HZO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AAP or HZO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.01), 1.9% yield). MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a higher beta of 1.68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAP: -53.9%, HZO: +71.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AAP and HZO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. AAP pays a dividend while HZO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.