Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (ALAB) vs Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) vs Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ALAB | 115.1% revenue growth vs TXN's 13.0% |
| Value | QCOM | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 31.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | AVGO | 36.2% net margin vs QCOM's 12.0% |
| Stability / Safety | TXN | Beta 1.29 vs ALAB's 2.34 |
| Dividends | TXN | 2.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs AVGO's 0.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AVGO | +61.4% vs QCOM's -7.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TXN | 14.5% ROA vs ADI's 5.6%, ROIC 16.6% vs 5.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Astera Labs designs semiconductor connectivity solutions that enable high-performance cloud and AI infrastructure. It generates revenue primarily from selling its portfolio of data, network, and memory connectivity products — including both hardware chips and supporting software — to cloud service providers and data center operators. The company's competitive advantage lies in its software-defined architecture that allows customers to scale AI infrastructure efficiently, addressing critical bottlenecks in data movement.
Broadcom is a semiconductor and infrastructure software company that designs and supplies critical components for data centers, networking, and connectivity. It generates revenue primarily from semiconductor sales (~70%) and infrastructure software licensing (~30%), with key segments including wired infrastructure, wireless communications, and enterprise storage. The company's moat lies in its deep engineering expertise, extensive patent portfolio, and entrenched positions in mission-critical infrastructure where customers face high switching costs.
Texas Instruments is a semiconductor company that designs and manufactures analog and embedded processing chips for industrial, automotive, and consumer electronics applications. It generates revenue primarily from analog chips (~75% of sales) and embedded processors (~25%), selling directly to electronics manufacturers across multiple industries. The company's competitive advantage stems from its deep expertise in analog technology—which is difficult to replicate—and its efficient manufacturing scale through its own fabrication facilities.
Analog Devices is a semiconductor company that designs and manufactures analog, mixed-signal, and digital signal processing integrated circuits for industrial, automotive, communications, and consumer markets. It generates revenue primarily through sales of data converters (~30%), power management ICs (~25%), amplifiers (~15%), and RF/microwave components (~15%) to industrial and automotive customers. The company's moat lies in its deep expertise in high-performance analog design—a difficult-to-master discipline—and its extensive portfolio of precision components that are deeply embedded in mission-critical systems.
Qualcomm is a semiconductor and wireless technology company that designs and licenses foundational technologies for mobile communications. It generates revenue primarily through selling smartphone chipsets (~75% of revenue) and licensing its extensive patent portfolio for wireless standards like 5G (~25% of revenue). The company's key advantage is its massive portfolio of essential wireless patents—particularly in CDMA and 5G—which creates a licensing moat that generates high-margin recurring revenue.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AVGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.9B annually — 74.9x ALAB's $853M. AVGO is the more profitable business, keeping 36.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 12.0%. On growth, ALAB holds the edge at +91.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $853M | $63.9B | $17.7B | $11.8B | $44.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $180M | $34.2B | $8.0B | $5.4B | $13.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $219M | $23.1B | $5.0B | $2.7B | $5.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $282M | $26.9B | $2.6B | $4.6B | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.7% | +67.8% | +57.0% | +62.8% | +55.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +39.9% | +34.1% | +29.2% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +36.2% | +28.3% | +23.0% | +12.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +42.1% | +14.7% | +38.8% | +28.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.8% | +22.0% | +10.4% | +30.4% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.6% | +3.1% | -1.5% | +116.7% | -1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 71% valuation discount to ALAB's 97.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AVGO offers better value at 4.80x vs QCOM's 13.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.2B | $1.52T | $192.5B | $173.7B | $152.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.1B | $1.56T | $203.3B | $179.9B | $161.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 97.40x | 66.99x | 38.92x | 78.02x | 28.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.23x | 31.10x | 33.02x | 31.50x | 12.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.80x | — | 11.45x | 13.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 111.28x | 44.06x | 25.35x | 36.47x | 11.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.73x | 23.71x | 10.89x | 15.76x | 3.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.65x | 19.08x | 11.90x | 5.23x | 7.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 71.79x | 56.29x | 73.95x | 40.60x | 11.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXN delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $8 for ADI. ADI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXN's 0.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs AVGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +28.4% | +30.7% | +8.0% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | +13.5% | +14.5% | +5.6% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +14.9% | +16.6% | +5.4% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.7% | +16.9% | +19.0% | +6.5% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.80x | 0.86x | 0.26x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$168M | $49.0B | $10.8B | $6.2B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $16.2B | $3.2B | $2.5B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $65.1B | $14.0B | $8.7B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.09x | 11.52x | 10.80x | 18.76x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth $67,244 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,332 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, AVGO leads with a +61.4% total return vs QCOM's -7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVGO at 76.4% vs QCOM's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.8% | -8.1% | +20.3% | +30.0% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.8% | +61.4% | +11.1% | +56.4% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.6% | +448.6% | +33.0% | +99.5% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.6% | +572.4% | +33.5% | +134.6% | +13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.6% | +2389.2% | +373.7% | +621.4% | +234.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +76.4% | +10.0% | +25.9% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
TXN is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALAB's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADI currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ALAB's 45.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.75x | 1.29x | 1.55x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $262.90 | $414.61 | $231.32 | $363.20 | $205.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.13 | $138.10 | $139.95 | $158.65 | $120.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.2% | +77.1% | +91.7% | +98.0% | +69.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 44.2 | 49.7 | 71.0 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 21.0M | 6.7M | 3.1M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALAB as "Buy", AVGO as "Buy", TXN as "Buy", ADI as "Buy", QCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.1% upside for ALAB (target: $202) vs -0.2% for TXN (target: $212). For income investors, TXN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs AVGO's 0.72%.
| Metric | ALABAstera Labs, Inc.… | AVGOBroadcom Inc. | TXNTexas Instruments… | ADIAnalog Devices, I… | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $202.14 | $443.72 | $211.79 | $374.42 | $161.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 57 | 65 | 54 | 67 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +2.6% | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 15 | 22 | 22 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.30 | $5.48 | $3.87 | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +5.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astera Labs, Inc. C… (ALAB) | 100 | 245.75 | +145.8% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 245.21 | +145.2% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 100 | 129.94 | +29.9% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 100 | 161.15 | +61.2% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 88.88 | -11.1% |
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) returned +572% over 5 years vs QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)'s +13%. A $10,000 investment in AVGO 5 years ago would be worth $67,244 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astera Labs, Inc. C… (ALAB) | $80M | $853M | +967.4% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | $13.2B | $63.9B | +382.5% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | $13.4B | $17.7B | +32.3% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | $3.4B | $11.0B | +222.1% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | $23.6B | $44.3B | +88.0% |
Broadcom Inc.'s revenue grew from $13.2B (2016) to $63.9B (2025) — a 19.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astera Labs, Inc. C… (ALAB) | -73.0% | 25.7% | +135.2% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -13.1% | 36.2% | +375.6% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 26.9% | 28.3% | +5.2% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 25.2% | 20.6% | -18.3% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 24.2% | 12.5% | -48.3% |
Broadcom Inc.'s net margin went from -13% (2016) to 36% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 61.2 | 72.6 | +18.6% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 28.9 | 31.8 | +10.0% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 38.9 | 59.5 | +53.0% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 39 | 34.1 | -12.6% |
Broadcom Inc. has traded in a 9x–189x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~67x. Texas Instruments Incorporated has traded in a 17x–36x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~39x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astera Labs, Inc. C… (ALAB) | -0.45 | 1.22 | +371.1% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | -0.44 | 4.77 | +1184.1% |
| Texas Instruments I… (TXN) | 3.48 | 5.45 | +56.6% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) | 2.76 | 4.56 | +65.2% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 3.81 | 5.01 | +31.5% |
Broadcom Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $4.77 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock generated $282M FCF in 2025 (+808% vs 2022). Broadcom Inc. generated $27B FCF in 2025 (+102% vs 2021).
ALAB vs AVGO vs TXN vs ADI vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM a better buy right now?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 28.4x trailing P/E (12.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (ALAB) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 28.4x versus Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock at 97.4x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 12.7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Broadcom Inc. wins at 2.23x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) delivered a total return of +572.4%, compared to +13.3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). A $10,000 investment in AVGO five years ago would be worth approximately $67K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVGO returned +23.9% versus ALAB's +91.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.29β versus Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock's 2.34β — meaning ALAB is approximately 81% more volatile than TXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 86% for Texas Instruments Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM?
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more profitable company, earning 36.2% net margin versus 12.5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVGO leads at 39.9% versus 20.3% for ALAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALAB leads at 75.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2.23x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 6.13x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 12.7x forward P/E versus 48.2x for Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock — 35.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALAB: 70.1% to $202.14.
07Which pays a better dividend — ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM?
In this comparison, TXN (2.6% yield), QCOM (2.4% yield), ADI (1.1% yield), AVGO (0.7% yield) pay a dividend. ALAB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ALAB or AVGO or TXN or ADI or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.29), 2.6% yield, +373.7% 10Y return). Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (ALAB) carries a higher beta of 2.34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +373.7%, ALAB: +91.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ALAB and AVGO and TXN and ADI and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. AVGO, TXN, ADI, QCOM pay a dividend while ALAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.