Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Anghami Inc. (ANGH) vs Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ANGH | 88.7% revenue growth vs WMG's 4.4% |
| Quality / Margins | WMG | 4.4% net margin vs ANGH's -81.4% |
| Stability / Safety | ANGH | Beta 0.53 vs WMG's 0.59, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WMG | 2.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; ANGH pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WMG | -12.9% vs ANGH's -56.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WMG | 3.0% ROA vs ANGH's -6.2%, ROIC 11.4% vs -254.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Anghami is a leading Arabic music streaming platform serving the Middle East and North Africa region. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — around 70% of revenue — with the remainder coming from advertising and partnerships. Its key advantage is its deep catalog of Arabic music and localized content that global competitors cannot easily replicate.
Warner Music Group is one of the world's three major music companies that discovers, develops, and markets recording artists and their music. It generates revenue primarily from recorded music sales and streaming (about 85% of revenue) and music publishing royalties (about 15%), with income coming from physical sales, digital downloads, streaming platforms, and licensing music for films, TV, and advertising. Its competitive advantage lies in owning a massive, valuable catalog of iconic recordings and publishing rights—including works from artists like Madonna, Bruno Mars, and Ed Sheeran—which provides stable, recurring revenue and significant negotiating power with digital platforms.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ANGH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WMG and ANGH operate at a comparable scale, with $6.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. WMG is the more profitable business, keeping 4.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANGH's -81.4%.
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$777,324 | $572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.8% | +45.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.6% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -81.4% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -60.7% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | -24.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27M | $10.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $14.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.27x | 40.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 19.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WMG delivers a 37.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-7 for ANGH. ANGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMG's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMG scores 3/9 vs ANGH's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.9% | +37.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 6.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | $4.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -749.60x | 3.70x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WMG five years ago would be worth $8,535 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $294 for ANGH. Over the past 12 months, WMG leads with a -12.9% total return vs ANGH's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMG at -0.9% vs ANGH's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.0% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | -12.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | -2.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -14.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.9% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | -0.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ANGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMG's 0.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMG currently trades 81.9% from its 52-week high vs ANGH's 39.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.60 | $34.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.25 | $25.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.5% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
WMG is the only dividend payer here at 2.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ANGHAnghami Inc. | WMGWarner Music Grou… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | 100 | 2.75 | -97.2% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 100 | 101.07 | +1.1% |
Warner Music Group … (WMG) returned -15% over 5 years vs Anghami Inc. (ANGH)'s -97%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | $31M | $78M | +150.1% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | $3.2B | $6.7B | +106.6% |
Warner Music Group Corp.'s revenue grew from $3.2B (2016) to $6.7B (2025) — a 8.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | -21.6% | -81.4% | -276.7% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 0.8% | 5.4% | +606.6% |
Warner Music Group Corp.'s net margin went from 1% (2016) to 5% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 74.4 | 43.8 | -41.1% |
Warner Music Group Corp. has traded in a 33x–74x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~41x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anghami Inc. (ANGH) | -1.3 | -11 | -746.2% |
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 0.05 | 0.7 | +1305.6% |
Warner Music Group Corp.'s EPS grew from $0.05 (2016) to $0.70 (2025) — a 34% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Anghami Inc. generated $-47M FCF in 2024 (-231% vs 2021). Warner Music Group Corp. generated $539M FCF in 2025 (+742% vs 2021).
ANGH vs WMG: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANGH or WMG a better buy right now?
Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) offers the better valuation at 40.9x trailing P/E (21.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ANGH or WMG?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) delivered a total return of -14.6%, compared to -97.1% for Anghami Inc. (ANGH). A $10,000 investment in WMG five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMG returned +7.2% versus ANGH's -96.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ANGH or WMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Anghami Inc. (ANGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.53β versus Warner Music Group Corp.'s 0.59β — meaning WMG is approximately 12% more volatile than ANGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Anghami Inc. (ANGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 6% for Warner Music Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — ANGH or WMG?
Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.4% net margin versus -81.4% for Anghami Inc. — meaning it keeps 5.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMG leads at 10.3% versus -79.6% for ANGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMG leads at 45.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ANGH or WMG?
In this comparison, WMG (2.6% yield) pays a dividend. ANGH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is ANGH or WMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.59), 2.6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMG: +7.2%, ANGH: -96.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ANGH and WMG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. WMG pays a dividend while ANGH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 27%