Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) vs Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ANTA | 321.0% revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% |
| Value | ALLY | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ANTA | 9.3% net margin vs ALLY's 7.0% |
| Stability / Safety | ALLY | Beta 1.23 vs ANTA's 1.90, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ALLY | +9.5% vs ANTA's -31.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ALLY | 0.4% ROA vs ANTA's 0.2%, ROIC 2.2% vs 0.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Antalpha Platform Holding Company is a crypto-focused financial services provider that offers Bitcoin-backed financing solutions to the digital asset industry. It generates revenue primarily through interest income from Bitcoin mining equipment loans and supply chain financing—secured by Bitcoin and mining hardware—along with platform service fees for loan management and compliance services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in crypto asset collateralization and its integrated technology platform that manages the unique risks of digital asset lending.
Ally Financial is a digital financial services company that provides consumer and commercial banking products primarily through online channels. It generates revenue mainly from automotive financing (roughly 70% of total revenue) and insurance operations, supplemented by mortgage lending and corporate finance services. The company's key advantage is its low-cost digital-only operating model—without physical branches—which allows it to offer competitive rates while maintaining strong customer loyalty in its core auto lending business.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
ALLY leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Valuation Metrics.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
ALLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.2B annually — 256.1x ANTA's $47M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.3% (ANTA) to 7.0% (ALLY).
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $12.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $852M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $829,499 | -$295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, ALLY trades at a 64% valuation discount to ANTA's 46.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALLY's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ANTA's 152.6x.
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $612M | $23.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.21x | 16.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.71x | 7.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 152.58x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.38x | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.37x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALLY delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for ANTA. ALLY carries lower financial leverage with a 1.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANTA's 8.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANTA scores 7/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.84x | 1.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $404M | $11.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $410M | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.22x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ALLY five years ago would be worth $10,541 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,859 for ANTA. Over the past 12 months, ALLY leads with a +9.5% total return vs ANTA's -31.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALLY at 12.7% vs ANTA's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.8% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.4% | +9.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.4% | +43.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.4% | +5.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.4% | +172.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.8% | +12.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ALLY is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANTA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs ANTA's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.90x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.72 | $47.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.35 | $29.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ANTAAntalpha Platform… | ALLYAlly Financial In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antalpha Platform H… (ANTA) | $11M | $47M | +321.0% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | $9.8B | $12.2B | +23.8% |
Ally Financial Inc.'s revenue grew from $9.8B (2016) to $12.2B (2025) — a 2.4% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antalpha Platform H… (ANTA) | -58.4% | 9.3% | +115.8% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 10.9% | 7.0% | -35.5% |
Ally Financial Inc.'s net margin went from 11% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 14.3 | 19.1 | +33.6% |
Ally Financial Inc. has traded in a 5x–20x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antalpha Platform H… (ANTA) | -0.29 | 0.19 | +165.5% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 2.15 | 2.37 | +10.2% |
Ally Financial Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.15 (2016) to $2.37 (2025) — a 1% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Antalpha Platform Holding Company generated $-12M FCF in 2024 (+4% vs 2023). Ally Financial Inc. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (+100% vs 2021).
ANTA vs ALLY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANTA or ALLY a better buy right now?
Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) offers the better valuation at 16.6x trailing P/E (7.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANTA or ALLY?
On trailing P/E, Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) is the cheapest at 16.6x versus Antalpha Platform Holding Company at 46.2x. On forward P/E, Ally Financial Inc. is actually cheaper at 7.5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANTA or ALLY?
Over the past 5 years, Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) delivered a total return of +5.4%, compared to -31.4% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA). A $10,000 investment in ALLY five years ago would be worth approximately $11K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLY returned +172.9% versus ANTA's -31.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANTA or ALLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.23β versus Antalpha Platform Holding Company's 1.90β — meaning ANTA is approximately 54% more volatile than ALLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 140% versus 9% for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ANTA or ALLY?
Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) is the more profitable company, earning 9.3% net margin versus 7.0% for Ally Financial Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLY leads at 8.6% versus 6.7% for ANTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLY leads at 52.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ANTA or ALLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) trades at 7.5x forward P/E versus 10.7x for Antalpha Platform Holding Company — 3.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — ANTA or ALLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ANTA or ALLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.23), +172.9% 10Y return). Antalpha Platform Holding Company (ANTA) carries a higher beta of 1.90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALLY: +172.9%, ANTA: -31.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ANTA and ALLY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ANTA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.