Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) vs Mastercard Incorporated (MA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MA | 16.4% revenue growth vs BFH's -7.3% |
| Value | BFH | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 26.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | MA | 45.6% net margin vs BFH's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | MA | Beta 0.78 vs BFH's 1.47 |
| Dividends | BFH | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MA's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BFH | +32.9% vs MA's -9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MA | 27.6% ROA vs BFH's 2.2%, ROIC 56.5% vs 3.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Bread Financial is a financial technology company that provides private-label and co-branded credit card programs along with point-of-sale installment lending solutions. It generates revenue primarily from interest income on its loan portfolio — which includes credit cards and buy-now-pay-later products — and from merchant fees for payment processing services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its established partnerships with over 130 retail brands and its integrated technology platform that embeds financing options directly into merchant checkout experiences.
Mastercard is a global payment technology company that operates a network connecting consumers, merchants, financial institutions, and governments. It generates revenue primarily from transaction processing fees—charging a small percentage of each payment volume—and from service fees for its data analytics, consulting, and security solutions. The company's moat lies in its massive two-sided network effect—the more merchants accept Mastercard, the more valuable it becomes to cardholders, and vice versa—creating a powerful ecosystem that's difficult to replicate.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BFH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MA is the larger business by revenue, generating $32.8B annually — 6.8x BFH's $4.8B. MA is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFH's 5.8%.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $32.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $623M | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $472M | $15.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | $17.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +59.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +52.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +24.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, BFH trades at a 59% valuation discount to MA's 31.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BFH's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MA's 22.7x.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $457.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $465.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.88x | 31.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.03x | 26.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.75x | 22.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 13.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 59.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.64x | 26.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 193.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $193 in annual profit, vs $14 for BFH. BFH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.86x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs BFH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +193.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +27.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +56.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +64.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 2.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.0B | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $11.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 26.39x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MA five years ago would be worth $14,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,442 for BFH. Over the past 12 months, BFH leads with a +32.9% total return vs MA's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFH at 21.4% vs MA's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.6% | -8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.9% | -9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.8% | +47.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.6% | +45.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +515.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +13.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFH's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.03 | $601.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.21 | $465.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.4% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 749K | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BFH as "Hold" and MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for MA (target: $667) vs 11.7% for BFH (target: $79). For income investors, BFH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs MA's 0.59%.
| Metric | BFHBread Financial H… | MAMastercard Incorp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.17 | $667.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.85 | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +2.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 100 | 106.41 | +6.4% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 181.06 | +81.1% |
Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) returned +46% over 5 years vs Bread Financial Hol… (BFH)'s -6%. A $10,000 investment in MA 5 years ago would be worth $14,586 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | $7.1B | $4.8B | -32.8% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | $10.8B | $32.8B | +204.3% |
Mastercard Incorporated's revenue grew from $10.8B (2016) to $32.8B (2025) — a 13.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 7.2% | 5.8% | -20.1% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 37.7% | 45.6% | +21.2% |
Mastercard Incorporated's net margin went from 38% (2016) to 46% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 14.3 | 11.1 | -22.4% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 41.5 | 34.6 | -16.6% |
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 2x–14x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x. Mastercard Incorporated has traded in a 34x–56x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~31x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bread Financial Hol… (BFH) | 7.34 | 5.5 | -25.1% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 3.69 | 16.52 | +347.7% |
Mastercard Incorporated's EPS grew from $3.69 (2016) to $16.52 (2025) — a 18% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2024 (+27% vs 2021). Mastercard Incorporated generated $17B FCF in 2025 (+98% vs 2021).
BFH vs MA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BFH or MA a better buy right now?
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) offers the better valuation at 12.9x trailing P/E (7.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mastercard Incorporated (MA) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BFH or MA?
On trailing P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) is the cheapest at 12.9x versus Mastercard Incorporated at 31.3x. On forward P/E, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BFH or MA?
Over the past 5 years, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) delivered a total return of +45.9%, compared to -5.6% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH). A $10,000 investment in MA five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +515.7% versus BFH's -51.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BFH or MA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.78β versus Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.'s 1.47β — meaning BFH is approximately 89% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 186% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BFH or MA?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the more profitable company, earning 45.6% net margin versus 5.8% for Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MA leads at 59.2% versus 7.9% for BFH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BFH or MA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) trades at 7.0x forward P/E versus 26.4x for Mastercard Incorporated — 19.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MA: 29.0% to $667.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BFH or MA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (BFH) offers the highest yield at 1.2%, versus 0.6% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA).
08Is BFH or MA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.78), 0.6% yield, +515.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +515.7%, BFH: -51.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BFH and MA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: BFH is a small-cap deep-value stock; MA is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.