Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare BKV Corporation (BKV) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BKV | 48.2% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value | BKV | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs BKV's 19.7% |
| Stability / Safety | BKV | Beta 1.16 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AAPL | 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; BKV pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BKV | +55.2% vs AAPL's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs BKV's 5.5%, ROIC 64.5% vs 5.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
BKV Corporation is a natural gas producer and midstream operator focused on acquiring, developing, and operating natural gas and natural gas liquids properties. It generates revenue primarily through natural gas production sales—with additional income from gathering, processing, and transportation services for third parties. The company benefits from its strategic position in key shale basins and its integrated midstream infrastructure, which provides operational control and cost advantages.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BKV leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 498.4x BKV's $874M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BKV's 19.7%. On growth, BKV holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $874M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $230M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $173M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$72M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.2% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.3% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.6% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.1x trailing earnings, BKV trades at a 55% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKV's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.07x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.35x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.76x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.15x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $8 for BKV. BKV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs BKV's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $287M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $199M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $487M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.82x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,406 for BKV. Over the past 12 months, BKV leads with a +55.2% total return vs AAPL's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs BKV's 20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.2% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.1% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.1% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.1% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.3% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BKV is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKV currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs AAPL's 91.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.74 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.00 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 550K | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKV as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for AAPL (target: $303) vs 8.5% for BKV (target: $34). AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BKVBKV Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Sep 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKV Corporation (BKV) | 100 | 156.22 | +56.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 119.36 | +19.4% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs BKV Corporation (BKV)'s +74%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKV Corporation (BKV) | $123M | $896M | +630.9% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKV Corporation (BKV) | -35.4% | 19.3% | +154.6% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKV Corporation (BKV) | -0.52 | 1.95 | +475.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
BKV Corporation generated $-57M FCF in 2025 (-120% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
BKV vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKV or AAPL a better buy right now?
BKV Corporation (BKV) offers the better valuation at 16.1x trailing P/E (14.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BKV Corporation (BKV) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKV or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, BKV Corporation (BKV) is the cheapest at 16.1x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, BKV Corporation is actually cheaper at 14.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKV or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to +74.1% for BKV Corporation (BKV). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus BKV's +74.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKV or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BKV Corporation (BKV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.16β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 10% more volatile than BKV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BKV Corporation (BKV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BKV or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 19.3% for BKV Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 17.8% for BKV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BKV or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BKV Corporation (BKV) trades at 14.4x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 16.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAPL: 14.7% to $303.11.
07Which pays a better dividend — BKV or AAPL?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. BKV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BKV or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28), +1027% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1027%, BKV: +74.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BKV and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BKV (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: BKV is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.