Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Berry Corporation (BRY) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AAPL | 6.4% revenue growth vs BRY's -9.2% |
| Value | BRY | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs BRY's -13.4% |
| Stability / Safety | AAPL | Beta 1.28 vs BRY's 1.55 |
| Dividends | BRY | 19.5% yield, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAPL | +9.7% vs BRY's -17.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs BRY's -6.6%, ROIC 64.5% vs 9.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Berry Corporation is an independent upstream energy company that develops and produces conventional oil reserves in the western United States. It makes money primarily through oil and gas production from its California and Utah basins — with additional revenue from well servicing and abandonment operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive portfolio of mature, low-decline conventional oil fields and its integrated well servicing capabilities.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 640.5x BRY's $680M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRY's -13.4%. On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $680M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $222M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$91M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.5% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -137.4% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, BRY trades at a 63% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BRY's 2.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $253M | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $673M | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.04x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.07x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.35x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $-14 for BRY. BRY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs BRY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.6% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $420M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.14x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,204 for BRY. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +9.7% total return vs BRY's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs BRY's -19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.0% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.7% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +727900.0% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.4% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BRY's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs BRY's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.11 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BRY as "Hold" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 114.7% upside for BRY (target: $7) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). For income investors, BRY offers the higher dividend yield at 19.48% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | BRYBerry Corporation | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +19.5% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.63 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Dec 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 100 | 53.74 | -46.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 378.98 | +279.0% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Berry Corporation (BRY)'s +32%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | $427M | $784M | +83.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | -3.0% | 2.5% | +181.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | 3.4 | 16.5 | +385.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Berry Corporation has traded in a 3x–18x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berry Corporation (BRY) | -15.78 | 0.25 | +101.6% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Berry Corporation generated $108M FCF in 2024 (+1115% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
BRY vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRY or AAPL a better buy right now?
Berry Corporation (BRY) offers the better valuation at 13.0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apple Inc. (AAPL) a "Buy" — based on 109 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRY or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Berry Corporation (BRY) is the cheapest at 13.0x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRY or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to +32.0% for Berry Corporation (BRY). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BRY returned +7279% versus AAPL's +1027%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRY or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus Berry Corporation's 1.55β — meaning BRY is approximately 21% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Berry Corporation (BRY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BRY or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 2.5% for Berry Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 19.5% for BRY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BRY or AAPL more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRY: 114.7% to $7.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRY or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Berry Corporation (BRY) offers the highest yield at 19.5%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is BRY or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Berry Corporation (BRY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (19.5% yield, +7279% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRY: +7279%, AAPL: +1027%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRY and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BRY (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: BRY is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. BRY pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.