Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) vs Figma, Inc. (FIG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FIG | 41.0% revenue growth vs BSY's 11.0% |
| Value | BSY | Lower P/E (26.9x vs 118.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | BSY | 18.5% net margin vs FIG's -124.5% |
| Stability / Safety | BSY | Beta 0.79 vs FIG's 1.91 |
| Dividends | BSY | 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; FIG pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BSY | -16.1% vs FIG's -74.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BSY | 7.8% ROA vs FIG's -56.0%, ROIC 11.4% vs -95.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Bentley Systems provides infrastructure engineering software solutions for designing, constructing, and operating infrastructure assets like roads, bridges, and utilities. It generates revenue primarily through recurring subscription fees — accounting for over 90% of total revenue — with the remainder from perpetual licenses and professional services. The company's moat lies in its deep domain expertise and comprehensive software ecosystem that creates high switching costs for engineering professionals in specialized infrastructure sectors.
Figma is a cloud-based collaborative design platform that enables teams to create, prototype, and develop digital products together in real time. It generates revenue primarily through subscription plans — with tiered pricing for individuals, teams, and enterprises — and makes money from seat-based licensing of its design, whiteboarding, and developer tools. Its key competitive advantage is its browser-first collaborative architecture, which creates network effects as design teams and their developer counterparts adopt the platform together.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BSY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FIG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BSY and FIG operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $1.1B in trailing revenue. BSY is the more profitable business, keeping 18.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIG's -124.5%.
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $459M | -$1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $278M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $520M | $243M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +82.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | -122.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | -124.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.6% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | — |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.00x | -7.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.86x | 118.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 33.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.36x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.23x | 6.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.24x | 9.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSY delivers a 23.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-87 for FIG. FIG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BSY's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSY scores 9/9 vs FIG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.4% | -87.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | -56.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | -95.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$345M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $403M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $58M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.01x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in BSY five years ago would be worth $8,429 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,545 for FIG. Over the past 12 months, BSY leads with a -16.1% total return vs FIG's -74.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSY at -2.7% vs FIG's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | -21.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.1% | -74.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.0% | -74.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | -74.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.1% | -74.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.7% | -36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BSY is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIG's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BSY currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs FIG's 20.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.25 | $142.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.96 | $19.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.7% | +20.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 9.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BSY as "Buy" and FIG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.3% upside for BSY (target: $48) vs 23.1% for FIG (target: $36). BSY is the only dividend payer here at 0.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BSYBentley Systems, … | FIGFigma, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.00 | $36.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Systems, In… (BSY) | $692M | $1.5B | +117.1% |
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | $505M | $1.1B | +109.1% |
Bentley Systems, Incorporated's revenue grew from $692M (2018) to $1.5B (2025) — a 11.7% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Systems, In… (BSY) | 20.5% | 18.5% | -9.9% |
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | 56.6% | -118.4% | -309.2% |
Bentley Systems, Incorporated's net margin went from 21% (2018) to 19% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Systems, In… (BSY) | 96.5 | 44.9 | -53.5% |
Bentley Systems, Incorporated has traded in a 45x–161x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Systems, In… (BSY) | 0.54 | 0.85 | +57.4% |
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | 0.59 | -3.71 | -732.7% |
Bentley Systems, Incorporated's EPS grew from $0.54 (2018) to $0.85 (2025) — a 7% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Bentley Systems, Incorporated generated $520M FCF in 2025 (+92% vs 2021). Figma, Inc. generated $246M FCF in 2025 (-76% vs 2023).
BSY vs FIG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSY or FIG a better buy right now?
Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) offers the better valuation at 43.0x trailing P/E (26.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSY or FIG?
On forward P/E, Bentley Systems, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 26.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSY or FIG?
Over the past 5 years, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) delivered a total return of -15.7%, compared to -74.6% for Figma, Inc. (FIG). A $10,000 investment in BSY five years ago would be worth approximately $8K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSY returned +12.1% versus FIG's -74.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSY or FIG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.79β versus Figma, Inc.'s 1.91β — meaning FIG is approximately 141% more volatile than BSY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Figma, Inc. (FIG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 108% for Bentley Systems, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BSY or FIG?
Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the more profitable company, earning 18.5% net margin versus -118.4% for Figma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSY leads at 24.1% versus -122.2% for FIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIG leads at 82.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BSY or FIG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) trades at 26.9x forward P/E versus 118.0x for Figma, Inc. — 91.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSY: 31.3% to $48.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BSY or FIG?
In this comparison, BSY (0.7% yield) pays a dividend. FIG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BSY or FIG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.79), 0.7% yield). Figma, Inc. (FIG) carries a higher beta of 1.91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSY: +12.1%, FIG: -74.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BSY and FIG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. BSY pays a dividend while FIG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.