Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (CAI) vs Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 97.0% revenue growth vs LLY's 32.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.4x vs 62.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.0% net margin vs CAI's -66.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CAI's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 10-year raise streak; CAI pays no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.6% vs CAI's -29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs CAI's -47.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Caris Life Sciences is an AI-powered molecular diagnostics company that provides comprehensive cancer profiling services to guide treatment decisions. It generates revenue primarily from molecular testing services for oncology patients — including tissue-based and blood-based profiling — along with pharmaceutical research services for drug development partners. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive molecular database and proprietary AI algorithms that analyze complex biomarker data to deliver personalized cancer treatment insights.
Eli Lilly is a global pharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, and markets innovative medicines for serious diseases like diabetes, cancer, and autoimmune disorders. It generates revenue primarily from drug sales — with diabetes treatments like Trulicity and Mounjaro contributing over 50% of revenue — and from oncology and immunology products. The company's competitive advantage lies in its deep research and development capabilities, particularly in diabetes and obesity treatments where it has established a strong patent-protected portfolio.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LLY leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.4B annually — 73.2x CAI's $812M. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 31.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAI's -66.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $812M | $59.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $28.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$538M | $18.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | $9.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +83.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +45.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.2% | +31.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +53.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LLY's 48.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAI's 718.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33.2B | $898.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.4B | $928.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.17x | 85.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.06x | 29.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 718.40x | 48.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 40.89x | 19.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 57.52x | 63.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 496.41x | 2168.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LLY delivers a 77.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $77 in annual profit, vs $-93 for CAI. CAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LLY's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 6/9 vs CAI's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -93.2% | +77.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.8% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +33.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +40.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$798M | $30.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $798M | $3.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $169,000 | $33.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.23x | 26.09x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $49,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,093 for CAI. Over the past 12 months, LLY leads with a +8.6% total return vs CAI's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LLY at 47.3% vs CAI's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.4% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.1% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | +219.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | +396.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | +1316.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.8% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
LLY is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAI's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LLY currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs CAI's 46.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.50 | $1133.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.15 | $623.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 44.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CAI as "Buy" and LLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for CAI (target: $31) vs 21.0% for LLY (target: $1214). LLY is the only dividend payer here at 0.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.33 | $1214.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caris Life Sciences… (CAI) | $294M | $812M | +175.9% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | $21.2B | $45.0B | +112.2% |
Caris Life Sciences, Inc.'s revenue grew from $294M (2016) to $812M (2025) — a 11.9% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caris Life Sciences… (CAI) | 2.0% | -66.2% | -3351.8% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 12.9% | 23.5% | +82.3% |
Caris Life Sciences, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to -66% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 37 | 65.9 | +78.1% |
Eli Lilly and Company has traded in a 15x–101x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~86x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caris Life Sciences… (CAI) | 0.31 | -3.22 | -1138.7% |
| Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY) | 2.49 | 11.71 | +370.3% |
Caris Life Sciences, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.31 (2016) to $-3.22 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Caris Life Sciences, Inc. generated $67M FCF in 2025 (+120% vs 2022). Eli Lilly and Company generated $414M FCF in 2024 (-92% vs 2021).
CAI vs LLY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CAI or LLY a better buy right now?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) offers the better valuation at 85.7x trailing P/E (29.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (CAI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CAI or LLY?
On forward P/E, Eli Lilly and Company is actually cheaper at 29.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CAI or LLY?
Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +396.9%, compared to -29.1% for Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (CAI). A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth approximately $50K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1316% versus CAI's -29.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CAI or LLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.65β versus Caris Life Sciences, Inc.'s 1.09β — meaning CAI is approximately 68% more volatile than LLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (CAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Eli Lilly and Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CAI or LLY?
Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 23.5% net margin versus -66.2% for Caris Life Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 38.9% versus 5.6% for CAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LLY leads at 81.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CAI or LLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) trades at 29.4x forward P/E versus 62.1x for Caris Life Sciences, Inc. — 32.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAI: 57.8% to $31.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — CAI or LLY?
In this comparison, LLY (0.5% yield) pays a dividend. CAI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CAI or LLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.65), 0.5% yield, +1316% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1316%, CAI: -29.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CAI and LLY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. LLY pays a dividend while CAI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.